Climate change: Back to development

Journal title ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Author/s Michel Damian, Luigi De Paoli
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2017/3
Language English Pages 20 P. 5-24 File size 277 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2017-003001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Paris Agreement has created a double bifurcation. First, from top-down approach (with an emissions limit imposed from above) to a bottom-up approach based on national emissions reduction pledges. And second, from a mitigation-centered policy to a more balanced mitigation and adaptation efforts. The following work proposes, however, that further steps must be taken to bring the theme of development back to the center of the fight against climate change. The article is divided into four parts. First is a reflection on the fact that mitigation has captured much of the attention during the past twenty years, but that adaptation is progressively gaining importance in policies to combat climate change. The next section explains why, starting from the Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, the objective of the "stabilization of greenhouse gases concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" has led first to define the increase of 2 ° C as the limit not to be exceeded, then to the search for an equivalent level of CO2 concentration and last to the related carbon budget. The third part shows why the goal of not exceeding the 2 ° C temperature increase is illusory when considering the discrepancy between actual mitigation policies and theoretical commitments required based on the data presented by the IPCC. Even salvation coming from negative emission technologies at the moment seems more theoretical than real. The final conclusions state that, given the insufficiency of the mitigation tools, adaptation must be taken seriously - not as a passive solution, but as a conception of a different kind of development, which is required not only to fight climate change, but also for other purposes. .

Keywords: Climate change, adaptation, mitigation, sustainable development, Paris agreement

Jel codes: Q54, F53, Q01

  • Global impacts of projected climate changes on the extent and aboveground biomass of mangrove forests Lidiane P. Gouvêa, Ester A. Serrão, Kyle Cavanaugh, Carlos F. D. Gurgel, Paulo A. Horta, Jorge Assis, in Diversity and Distributions /2022 pp.2349
    DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13631
  • СТАЛИЙ РОЗВИТОК ЯК СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА МОДЕЛЬ «ВИГРАШ-ВИГРАШ»: КОНТЕКСТИ ОКРЕМИХ КРАЇН ТА РЕКОМЕНДАЦІЇ ДЛЯ УКРАЇНИ Максим Філяк, Володимир Аредов, in Mechanism of an economic regulation /2024 pp.61
    DOI: 10.32782/mer.2024.104.08

Michel Damian, Luigi De Paoli, Climate change: Back to development in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2017, pp 5-24, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2017-003001