Public Educators: Dutch Historians Influence Contemporary Politics
Journal title MEMORIA E RICERCA
Author/s Hinke Piersma
Publishing Year 2011 Issue 2011/37
Language Italian Pages 15 P. 71-85 File size 123 KB
DOI 10.3280/MER2011-037005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The accumulation of knowledge by government institutions has never been a judgment-free activity. Ever since its foundation in 1945, the Netherlands Institute for Study and Documentation of the Second World War (presently NIOD) has been trying to find a balance between scholarly pursuits and its social impact. In this article I explore three highly-debated cases, in which two NIOD directors were involved. These cases include: the fall of the Christian Democratic politician Willem Aantjes, the affair surrounding the Dutch war criminal Pieter Menten, and the dramatic events in Srebrenica and the question of Dutch responsibility. These topics are examples of situations in which scholarly research is intertwined with political debate. It raises the question of the role of historians when the past is publicly on trial. How is such a public role on the part historians affecting the profession in general, and, more specifically, is there a danger that historical research could become nothing other than politics by other means?
Keywords: Second World War; Collaboration; Dutch politics; Historians as hangman; Public History; Education
Hinke Piersma, Educatori pubblici: gli storici olandesi influenzano la politica contemporanea in "MEMORIA E RICERCA " 37/2011, pp 71-85, DOI: 10.3280/MER2011-037005