Le campagne di marketing politico online: una rassegna sistematica della letteratura

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE
Autori/Curatori M. Irene Prete, Antonio Mileti, Mattia Bianco, Gianluigi Guido
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/55
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 23 P. 48-70 Dimensione file 271 KB
DOI 10.3280/SC2018-055004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The authors provide a review of studies on the media currently offered by web 2.0, used in election campaigns in many countries, published from 2003 to 2017 in the following thematic journals: Comunicazione Politica, Information, Communi-cation & Society, Journal of Communication, Journal of Communication Man-agement, Journal of Political Marketing, Online Information Review, Policy and Internet, and Political Communication. Results show that digital tools like social media and microblogging platforms ensure a higher voter involvement, allowing to quickly reaching a young age audience, and to establish a two-way relationship. Conversely, web sites, blogs and forums are used primarily by adult users, have a lower level of immediacy of communication and generate a one-way relationship. Finally, Facebook and Twitter represent the most used tools in the political com-munication of the democratic countries.

Parole chiave:Online political campaign; political marketing, online political com-munication, social media, social marketing, digital information.

  1. Aharony N. (2012), Twitter use by three political leaders: An exploratory analysis, in «Online Information Review» n. 36 (4), pp. 587-603. DOI: 10.1108/14684521211254086
  2. Aragon P., Kappler K.E., Kaltenbrunner A., Laniado D., Volkovich Y. (2013), Communication dynamics in Twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish national election, in «Policy and Internet» n. 5 (2), pp. 183-206. DOI: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI327
  3. Bentivegna S., Marchetti R. (2015), Fra tradizione e innovazione. Le elezioni europee del 2014 su Twitter, in «Comunicazione Politica», n. 3, pp. 389-408. DOI: 10.3270/81693
  4. Bailo F. (2015), Mapping online political talks through network analysis: A case study of the website of Italy’s Five Star movement, in «Policy Studies», 36 (6), pp. 550-572. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1095282
  5. Bode L., Dalrymple K.E. (2014), Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 15 (4), pp. 311-332. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
  6. Boulianne S. (2009), Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research, in «Political Communication», n. 26 (2), pp. 193-211. DOI: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  7. Bor S.E. (2014), Using social network sites to improve communication between political campaigns and citizens in the 2012 election, in «The American Behavioral Scientist», 58 (9), p. 1195-1213. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213490698
  8. Branstetter J. (2011), The challenge of new media in French and American politics: Concepts, methods and opportunities, in «French Politics» n. 9 (1), pp. 69-86.
  9. Cameron M.P., Barrett P., Stewardson B. (2014), Can social media predict election results? Evidence from New Zealand, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 15 (4), pp. 416-432. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2014.959690
  10. Carlson T. (2007), It’s a man’s world?, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 6 (1), pp. 41-67.
  11. Chen Y. (2013), See you on Facebook: Exploring influences on Facebook continuous usage, in «Behaviour & Information Technology» n. 33 (11), pp. 1208-1218. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.826737
  12. Cogburn D.L., Espinoza-Vasquez F.K. (2011), From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (1-2), pp. 189-213. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
  13. David E., Zhitomirsky-Geffet M., Koppel M., Uzan H. (2016), Utilizing Facebook pages of the political parties to automatically predict the political orientation of Facebook users, in «Online Information Review» n. 40 (5), pp. 610-623.
  14. Demertzis N., Diamantaki K., Gazi A., Sartzetakis N. (2005), Greek political marketing online, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 4 (1), pp. 51-74.
  15. Dolezal M. (2015), Online campaigning by Austrian political candidates: Determinants of using personal websites, Facebook, and Twitter, in «Policy and Internet» n. 7 (3), pp. 103-119.
  16. Druckman J.N., Kifer M.J., Parkin M. (2010), Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, in «Political Communication», n. 27 (1), pp. 88-103. DOI: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  17. Druckman J.N., Kifer M.J., Parkin M., Montes I. (2017), An Inside View of Congressional Campaigning on the Web, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 2, pp. 1-34. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2016.1274279
  18. Elmer G., Langlois G. (2013), Networked campaigns: Traffic tags and cross platform analysis on the web, in «Information Polity», 18 (1), p. 43. DOI: 10.3233/IP-2011-0244
  19. Elmer G., Langlois G., McKelvey F., Devereaux, Z. (2009), Networked publics: The double articulation of code and politics on Facebook, in «Canadian Journal of Communication» n. 34 (3), pp. 415-434.
  20. Etter M. (2014), Broadcasting, reacting, engaging - three strategies for CSR communication in Twitter, in «Journal of Communication Management» n. 18 (4), pp. 322-342. DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0007
  21. Foot K., Schneider S.M., Xenos M., Dougherty M. (2009), Candidates' Web practices in the 2002 U.S. House, Senate, and gubernatorial elections, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 8 (2), pp. 147-167. DOI: 10.1080/15377850902813519
  22. Garcia-Castañon M., Rank A.D., Barreto M.A. (2011), Plugged in or tuned out? Youth, race, and Internet usage in the 2008 election, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (1-2), pp. 115-138. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540209
  23. Gerodimos R., Justinussen J. (2014), Obama’s 2012 Facebook campaign: political communication in the age of the like button, in «Journal of Information Technology & Politics» n. 12 (2), pp. 113-132. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.982266
  24. Gibson R., McAllister I. (2009), Online election surveys: Keeping the voters honest?, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 8 (2), pp. 105-129. DOI: 10.1080/15377850902813360
  25. Guido G. (2005), La dimensione dei rapporti con i consumatori nelle imprese orientate al marketing competitivo, Carocci, Roma.
  26. Hahn K., Lee h., Ha S., Jang S., Lee J. (2017), The influence of social viewing on televised debate viewers’ political judgment, in «Political Communication», n. 35 (1), pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1354947
  27. Hall T.E., Sinclair B. (2011), The American Internet voter, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (1-2), pp. 58-79. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540194
  28. Harris L., Harrigan P. (2015), Social media in politics: The ultimate voter engagement tool or simply an echo chamber?, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 14 (3), pp. 251-283. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2012.69305
  29. Jackson N.A. (2011), Perception or reality: How MPs believe the Internet helps them win votes, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (3), pp. 230-250. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.588099
  30. Jackson N.A., Lilleker D.G. (2010), Tentative steps towards interaction: The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament election 2009, in «Internet Research» n. 20 (5), pp. 527-544. DOI: 10.1108/10662241011084103
  31. Jackson N.A., Lilleker D.G. (2013), Reaching inward not outward: Marketing via the Internet at the UK 2010 general election, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 12 (2-3), pp. 244-261. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2013.781475
  32. Johansen H.P.M. (2005), Political marketing: More than persuasive techniques, an organizational perspective, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 4 (4), pp. 85-105.
  33. Kreiss D., Lawrence R., McGregor S. (2017), In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use, in «Political Communication», n. 35 (1), pp. 155-177. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727
  34. Kreiss D., McGregor S. (2017), Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. Presidential cycle, in «Political Communication», n. 35 (2), pp. 8-31. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
  35. Kruikemeier S., van Noort G., Vliegenthart R., de Vreese C.H. (2016), The relationship between online campaigning and political involvement, in «Online Information Review» n. 40 (5), pp. 673-694. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0346
  36. Kwon K.H., Stefanone M.A., Barnett G.A. (2014), Social network influence on online behavioral choices: Exploring group formation on social network sites, in «The American Behavioral Scientist» n. 58 (10), p. 1345-1360. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214527092
  37. Lappas G., Chatzopoulos S., Yannas P. (2008), Parliamentary candidates running on the web for the 2004 Greek national elections, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 7 (3), pp. 256-277. DOI: 10.1080/15377850802008327
  38. Lee E. (2013), Effectiveness of politicians’ soft campaign on Twitter versus TV: Cognitive and experiential routes, in «Journal of Communication» n. 63 (5), p. 953-974.
  39. Leone S., Delli Paoli A. (2016), The social media communication flows of Italian Institutions. A framework analysis for public and political communication on Twitter, in «Comunicazione Politica», n. 3, pp. 393-424. DOI: 10.3270/8468
  40. Lilleker D. G., Tenscher J., Štětka V. (2014), Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective, in «Information, Communication & Society» n. 18 (7), pp. 747-765. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.99367
  41. Magin M., Podschuweit N., Haßler J., Russmann U. (2016), Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns, in «Information, Communication & Society», pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
  42. Mascheroni G., Minucci S. (2010), Le elezioni europee sul web: Campaigning 2.0?, in «Comunicazione Politica», n. 1, pp. 107-114. DOI: 10.3270/31644
  43. Miller W.J. (2013), We can’t all be Obama: The use of new media in modern political campaigns, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 12 (4), pp. 326-347. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2013.837312
  44. Naseer M.M., Mahmood K. (2016), Ready for e-electioneering? Empirical evidence from Pakistani political parties’ websites, in «Internet Research» n. 26 (4), pp. 901-918.
  45. Norris, P. (2000), A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Page J.T., Duffy M.E. (2016), What does credibility look like? Tweets and walls in U.S. Presidential candidates’ visual storytelling, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 4, pp. 1-29. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2016.1171819
  47. Panagopoulos C. (2011), Introduction: Money and technology in the 2008 elections, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (1-2), pp. 1-3. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540188
  48. Prete M.I. (2007), M-politics: Credibility and effectiveness of mobile political communications, in «Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing» n. 16 (1), pp. 48-56.
  49. Prete M.I. (2015) Aspetti metodologici e operativi del processo dell’approccio di marketing politico, Coordinamento SIBA, Università del Salento.
  50. Reuter O.J., Szakonyi D. (2015), Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes, in «British Journal of Political Science» n. 45 (1), pp. 29-51. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123413000203
  51. Roberts C. (2013), A Functional analysis comparison of web-only advertisements and traditional television advertisements from the 2004 and 2008 Presidential campaigns, in «Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly» n. 90 (1), pp. 23-38. DOI: 10.1177/1077699012468741
  52. Schweitzer E.J. (2011), Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002-9, in «European Journal of Communication» n. 26 (4), p. 310-327. DOI: 10.1177/0267323111423378
  53. Sommer M., Tavlin B. (2003), Notes on the California e-politics campaign trail, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 3 (1), pp. 87-96.
  54. Soukup P.A. (2014), Political communication, in «Communication Research Trends» n. 33 (2), pp. 3-43.
  55. Stier S., Bleier A., Lietz H., Strohmaier M. (2018), Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter, in «Political Communication», n. 35 (1), pp. 50-74. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
  56. Towner T.L., Dulio D.A. (2011). The web 2.0 election: does the online medium matter?, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 10 (1-2), pp. 165-188. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540220
  57. Towner T.L., Dulio D.A. (2012), New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 11 (1-2), pp. 95-119. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
  58. Towner T.L., Muñoz C.L. (2016), Baby boom or bust? The new media effect on political participation, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 2, pp. 1-30. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2016.1153561
  59. Vaccari C. (2016), Online mobilization in comparative perspective: digital appeals and political engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, in «Political Communication», n. 34 (1), pp. 69-88. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1201558
  60. Ventura S. (2017), La comunicazione referendaria di Matteo Renzi. Personalizzazione, narrazione e feuilleton, in «Comunicazione Politica», n. 3, pp. 431-458. DOI: 10.3270/87972
  61. Vila-Lopez N., Amoros-Kern E., Aldas-Manzano J. (2013), Posicionamiento de marcas políticas a través de la web/positioning political brand through the web/posicionamiento marcas politicos atraves da web, in «Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad» n. 7 (1), pp. 16-29. DOI: 10.3232/GCG.2013.V7.N1.01
  62. Vraga E. (2016), Party differences in political content on social media, in «Online Information Review» n. 40 (5), pp. 595-609. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-10-2015-0345
  63. Wallsten K. (2008), Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxes, mobilizers, or conversation starters?, in «Journal of Information Technology & Politics» n. 4 (3), pp. 19-40. DOI: 10.1080/19331680801915033
  64. Wattal S., Schuff D. (2010), Mandviwalla M., Williams C.B. Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential election and an e-politics research agenda, in «MIS Quarterly» n. 34 (4), p. 669-688.
  65. Wu H.D., Dahmen N.S. (2010), Web sponsorship and campaign effects: Assessing the difference between positive and negative web sites, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 9 (4), pp. 314-329. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2010.522454
  66. Yang T. (2015), The decision behavior of Facebook users, in «Journal of Computer Information Systems» n. 52 (3), pp. 50-59.
  67. Yannas P., Lappas G. (2005), Web campaign in the 2002 Greek municipal elections, in «Journal of Political Marketing» n. 4 (1), pp. 33-50.
  68. Yoo S.W., de Zúñiga H.G. (2014), Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation, in «Comunicación y Sociedad» n. 27 (4), pp. 33-48. DOI: 10.15581/003.27.4.33-48

M. Irene Prete, Antonio Mileti, Mattia Bianco, Gianluigi Guido, Le campagne di marketing politico online: una rassegna sistematica della letteratura in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 55/2018, pp 48-70, DOI: 10.3280/SC2018-055004