Gli atteggiamenti nei confronti dell’immigrazione prima e dopo la pandemia Covid-19 in 13 paesi europei. Uno studio esplicativo

Titolo Rivista MONDI MIGRANTI
Autori/Curatori Veronica Riniolo, Vera Lomazzi
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 22 P. 189-210 Dimensione file 152 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2025-001010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il presente studio intende contribuire alla comprensione dell’impatto della pandemia Covid-19 sugli atteggiamenti nei confronti dell’immigrazione in Europa analizzando il ruolo dei fattori individuali e contestuali. Sulla base dei dati della European Social Survey (round 9 e 10), i risultati mostrano che, dopo la crisi pandemica e contrariamente alla nostra ipotesi iniziale, gli atteggiamenti negativi nei confronti degli immigrati sono diminuiti in diversi paesi europei, sebbene non in tutti e non con la stessa intensità. Fattori contestuali quali per esempio le politiche di integrazione, la salienza del tema immigrazione e le condizioni economiche di un paese sono cruciali per spiegare tale eterogeneità. La crisi può aver inciso sulle priorità dei cittadini europei con una conseguente perdita di salienza della questione migratoria del dibattito pubblico. Accanto alle statistiche descrittive, abbiamo applicato un modello multilivello per contribuire a spiegare tali cambiamenti, controllando per le variabili individuali. .

Parole chiave:atteggiamenti verso l’immigrazione; COVID-19; European Social Survey; valori umani; Europa

  1. Allport G.W. (1979 [1954]). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Ambrosini M. (2020). L’invasione immaginaria. L’immigrazione oltre i luoghi comuni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  3. Anderson B. (2019). New directions in migration studies: towards methodological de-nationalism. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 36;
  4. Ariely G. (2017). Global identification, xenophobia and globalization: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Psychology, 52, S1: 87-96.
  5. Beierlein C., Kuntz A, e Davidov E. (2016). Universalism, Conservation and Attitudes Toward Minority Groups. Social Science Research, 58: 68-79.
  6. Boehle M. e Wolf C. (2012). Understanding time as socio-historical context: Analyzing social change within the framework of multilevel analysis (R. Careja, a cura di); http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-315288
  7. Davidov E. e Meuleman B. (2012). Explaining Attitudes Towards Immigration Policies in European Countries: The Role of Human Values, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 5: 757-775; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.667985
  8. Davidov E., Seddig D., Gorodzeisky A., Raijman R., Schmidt P. e Semyonov M. (2020). Direct and indirect predictors of opposition to immigration in Europe: individual values, cultural values, and symbolic threat. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 3: 553-573; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550152
  9. Davidov E., Cieciuch J., Meuleman B., Schmidt P., Algesheimer R. e Hausherr M. (2015). The Comparability of Measurements of Attitudes toward Immigration in the European Social Survey Exact versus Approximate Measurement Equivalence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, S1: 244-266;
  10. Davidov E., Meuleman B., Billiet J. e Schmidt P. (2008). Values and Support for Immigration: A Cross-Country Comparison. European Sociological Review, 24, 5: 583-599;
  11. Dennison J. e Geddes A. (2020). Why COVID-19 does not necessarily mean that attitudes towards immigration will become more negative. International Organization for Migration (IOM). Geneva.
  12. Dennison J., Kustov A. e Geddes A. (2023). Public Attitudes to Immigration in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Little Change in Policy Preferences, Big Drops in Issue Salience. International Migration Review, 57, 2: 557-577.
  13. Eurobarometer (2022). Special Eurobarometer 519. Integration of immigrants in the European Union; https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/special-eurobarometer-integration-immigrants-european-union_en
  14. Eurobarometer (2020), COVID-19 Online survey, Wave 2 [online]; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/it/be-heard/eurobarometer/public-opinion-in-the-eu-in-time-of-coronavirus-crisis-2
  15. Fibbi R., Midtbøen A.H. e Simon P. (2021). Migration and Discrimination. Imiscoe Research Series, Springer.
  16. Fundamental Rights Agency. FRA (2017). Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey. Main Results; https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2017-eu-midis-ii-main-results_en.pdf
  17. Girardelli D., Nguyen T.M. e Croucher S. (2021). La pandemia COVID-19, la sinofobia e il ruolo dei social media in Italia. Mondi Migranti, 1: 85-104.
  18. Gover A.R., Harper S.B. e Langton L. (2020). Anti-asian hate crime during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the reproduction of inequality. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 4: 647-667;
  19. Hartman Todd K., Stocks T.V.A., McKay R. et al. (2021). The Authoritarian Dynamic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects on Nationalism and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 7: 1274-1285; DOI: 10.1177/1948550620978023
  20. Heizmann B. e Huth-Stöckle N. (2022). The nexus between attitudes towards migration and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from 11 European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2022.211488
  21. Hox J.J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Kent J. (2022). Can urban fabric encourage tolerance? Evidence that the structure of cities influence attitudes toward migrants in Europe. Cities, 121, 103494.
  23. Kunovich R.M. (2004) ‘Social structural position and prejudice: an exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes’. Social Science Research, 33, 1: 20-44.
  24. Kustov A., Laaker D. e Reller C. (2021). The Stability of Immigration Attitudes: Evidence and Implications. The Journal of Politics, 83, 4: 1478-1794; DOI: 10.1086/71506
  25. Lomazzi V. e Vezzoni C. (2018). Consolidamento e innovazione nelle surveys transnazionali europee. Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 116, 2: 143-158; DOI: 10.3280/SR2018-11601
  26. Larsen M.H. e Schaeffer M. (2021). Healthcare Chauvinism During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47, 7: 1455-1473; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1860742
  27. Maxwell R. (2019). Cosmopolitan Immigration Attitudes in Large European Cities: Contextual or Compositional Effects? American Political Science Review, 113, 2: 456-474.
  28. Meuleman B. e Billiet J. (2009). A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methods, 3, 1: 45-58;
  29. Meuleman B., Abts K., Schmidt P., Pettigrew T.F. e Davidov E. (2020). Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 3: 593-611; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.155015
  30. Meuleman B. e Billiet J. (2012). Measuring Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe: The Cross-Cultural Validity of the ESS Immigration Scales; http://hdl.handle.net/1811/69578
  31. Morales L. e Giugni M. (2011). Political opportunities, social capital and the political inclusion of immigrants in European cities. In: Morales L. e M. Giugni (a cura di), Social capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe. Making multicultural democracy work? (pp. 1-18). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Neumann R. e Moy P. (2018). You’re (Not) Welcome: The Impact of Symbolic Boundaries, Intergroup Contact, and Experiences With Discrimination on Immigration Attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist , 62, 4 : 458-477; DOI: 10.1177/000276421876037
  33. Pettigrew T.F. e Tropp L.R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 5: 751-783.
  34. Reeskens T. e Vandecasteele L. (2017). Hard times and European youth. The effect of economic insecurity on human values, social attitudes and well-being. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 1: 19-27.
  35. Reny T.T. e Barreto M.A. (2020), Xenophobia in the time of pandemic: othering, anti-Asian attitudes, and COVID-19, Politics, Groups, and Identities; DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2020.176969
  36. Roberto K.J., Johnson A.F. e Rauhaus B.M. (2020). Stigmatization and prejudice during the COVID-19 pandemic, Administrative Theory & Praxis; DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2020.178212
  37. Schlueter E. and Davidov E. (2013). Contextual Sources of Perceived Group Threat: Negative Immigration-Related News Reports, Immigrant Group Size and Their Interaction, Spain 1996-2007. European Sociological Review, 29, 2: 179-191;
  38. Schlueter E., Meuleman B. e Davidov E. (2013). Immigrant Integration policies and perceived Group Threat: A Multilevel Study of 27 Western and Eastern European Countries. Social Science Research, 42: 670-682
  39. Schneider S.H., Eger J., Bruder M., Faust J. e Wieler L.H. (2021). Does the COVID-19 pandemic threaten global solidarity? Evidence from Germany. World Development, 140, 105356;
  40. Schneider S.L. e Heath A.F. (2020). Ethnic and cultural diversity in Europe: Validating measures of ethnic and cultural background. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 3: 533-552; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.155015
  41. Snijders T.A. e Bosker R.J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. SAGE.
  42. Schwartz S.H. (2015). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In: Sander D. e Brosch T. (a cura di), Handbook of value (pp. 66-84). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  43. Semyonov M., Raijman R., Yom-Tov A. e Schmidt P. (2004). Population Size, Perceived Threat, and Exclusion: A Multiple-Indicators Analysis of Attitudes toward Foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research, 33: 681-701.
  44. Solano G. e Huddleston T. (2020). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020; https://www.mipex.eu/key-findings
  45. Taniguchi H. (2021). National identity, cosmopolitanism, and attitudes toward immigrants. International Sociology, 36, 6: 819-843.
  46. van Maaren F.M. e A. van de Rijt (2020). No integration paradox among adolescents. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 9: 1756-1772.
  47. van de Vijver F. e Tanzer N.K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 2: 119-135;
  48. Verkasalo M., Goodwin R. e Bezmenova I. (2006). Values following a major terrorist incident: Finnish adolescent and student values before and after September 11, 2001. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36: 144-160.
  49. Wihtol de Wenden C. (2021). Coronavirus et migrations. MondiMigranti 1: 9-16.
  50. Zaccarin S. e Rivellini G. (2002). Multilevel analysis in social research: An application of a cross-classified model. Statistical Methods and Applications, 11, 1: 95-108; DOI: 10.1007/BF0251144
  51. Zschirnt E. e Ruedin D. (2016). Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990-2015. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 7: 1115-1113.

Veronica Riniolo, Vera Lomazzi, Gli atteggiamenti nei confronti dell’immigrazione prima e dopo la pandemia Covid-19 in 13 paesi europei. Uno studio esplicativo in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 1/2025, pp 189-210, DOI: 10.3280/MM2025-001010