L’adozione dell’intervista con foto-stimolazione con minori: accorgimenti e stratagemmi

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Agnese Desideri
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/130
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 19 P. 89-107 Dimensione file 225 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2023-130005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

A. Desideri, (L’adozione dell’intervista con foto-stimolazione con minori: accorgimenti e stratagemmi) This essay reflects on ways of carrying out scientific investigations involv- ing children. These reflections emerged during a three­year empirical study on the processes of social categorization, where ninety-six minors were inter- viewed through a photo-stimulation interview. The focus is on the selection and preparation of the detection technique. The photo-stimulated instrument will be analyzed in a comparative key with other detection tools, in order to highlight the potential but also the critical issues. The measures taken to involve minors will also be described.

  1. T. Abebe (2009), «Multiple methods, complex dilemmas: Negotiating socio-ethical spaces in participatory research with disadvantaged children», Children’s Geographies, 7, 4, pp. 451- 65, DOI: 10.1080/14733280903234519
  2. M. Banks (2001), Visual Methods in Social Research, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  3. M. Banks (2018), Using visual data in qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2nd ed., DOI: 10.4135/9781526445933
  4. C. Barone, D. Fougère, C. Pin (2021), «Social origins, shared book reading, and language skills in early childhood: Evidence from an information experiment», European Sociological Re- view, 37, 1, pp. 18-31,
  5. H.S. Becker (1974), «Photography and Sociology», Studies in Visual Communication, 1, 1, pp. 3-26, disponibile all’indirizzo https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/3.
  6. B. Bernstein (2003), Class, codes and control, vol. 4, London, Routledge.
  7. D. Bertaux (1999), Racconti di vita, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  8. D. Bhana (2016), Gender and childhood sexuality in primary school, Singapore, Springer.
  9. R. Bichi (2002), L’intervista biografica. Una proposta metodologica, Milano, Vita e pensiero.
  10. P. Bourdieu (1998), Meditazioni pascaliane, Milano, Feltrinelli, 2a ed.
  11. N. Bushin (2007), «Interviewing with children in their homes: Putting ethical principles into practice and developing flexible techniques», Children’s Geographies, 5, 3, pp. 235-51, DOI: 10.1080/14733280701445796
  12. H. Cameron (2005), «Asking the tough questions: A guide to ethical practices in inter- viewing young children», Early Child Development and Care, 175, 6, pp. 597-610, DOI: 10.1080/03004430500131387
  13. T. Chin, M. Phillips (2004), «Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children’s agency, and the summer activity gap», Sociology of Education, 77, 3, pp. 185- 210, DOI: 10.1177/003804070407700301
  14. P.H. Christensen (2004), «Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representation», Children & Society, 18, 2, pp. 165-76,
  15. C.D. Clark (1999), «The Autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s expe- rience», Visual Sociology, 14, 1, pp. 39-50, DOI: 10.1080/14725869908583801
  16. M. Clark­Ibáñez (2004), «Framing the Social World with Photo­Elicitation Interviews», The American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 12, pp. 1507-27, DOI: 10.1177/000276420426623
  17. M. Collier, J. Collier (1986), Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method, Albu- querque, University of New Mexico Press, 6th rev. and exp. ed.
  18. Comune di Firenze (2019), Report Migranti – le cifre, -- https://sociale.comune.fi.it/system/fi- les/2019­12/report2019_Definitivo_0.pdf.
  19. P. Connolly, B. Kelly, A. Smith (2009), «Ethnic habitus and young children: A case study of Northern Ireland», European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17, 2, pp. 217- 32, DOI: 10.1080/13502930902951460
  20. W.A. Corsaro (2017), The sociology of childhood, London, Sage Publications, 5th ed.
  21. M. Douglas (2015), Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo with a new preface by the author, London, Routledge.
  22. J. Einarsdóttir (2007), «Research with children: Methodological and ethical challenges», Eu- ropean Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15, 2, pp. 197-211, DOI: 10.1080/13502930701321477
  23. I. Epstein, B. Stevens, P. McKeever, S. Baruchel (2006), «Photo elicitation inter­view (Pei): Using photos to elicit children’s perspectives», International Journal of Qualitative Me- thods, 5, 3, pp. 1-11, DOI: 10.1177/160940690600500301
  24. K.A. Ericsson, H.A. Simon (1980) «Verbal reports as data», Psychological Review, 87, 3, pp. 215-51.
  25. P. Faccioli, G. Losacco (2010), Nuovo manuale di sociologia visuale. Dall’analogico al digita- le, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2a ed.
  26. M. Fargas­Malet, D. McSherry, E. Larkin, C. Robinson (2010), «Research with children: me- thodological issues and innovative techniques», Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8, 2, pp. 175-92, DOI: 10.1177/1476718X09345412
  27. A. Favole, S. Allovio (2002), Plasticità e incompletezza tra etnografie e neuroscienze, in F. Remotti (a c. di), Forme di umanità, Milano, Bruno Mondadori.
  28. U. Flick (2002), An introduction to qualitative research, London, Sage.
  29. K. Ford, L. Bray, T. Water, A. Dickinson, J. Arnott, B. Carter (2017), «Auto­driven photo elicita- tion interviews in research with children: Ethical and practical considerations», Comprehen- sive Child and Adolescent Nursing, 40, 2, pp. 111-25, doi 10.1080/24694193.2016.1273977.
  30. S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, C. Robinson (2004), Doing Research with Children and Young People, London, Sage.
  31. C. Giorcelli, P. Rabinowitz (eds.) (2012), Exchanging Clothes: Habits of Being II, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  32. E. Gómez Cruz (2020), «Black Screens: A Visual Essay on Mobile Screens in the City», Visual Communication, 19, 1, pp. 143-56, DOI: 10.1177/1470357219872237
  33. I. Hacking (1986), Making up people, in T.C. Heller, M. Sosna, D.E. Wellbery, Reconstruc- ting individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought, Standford, Standford University Press.
  34. D. Harper (2002), «Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation», Visual Studies, 17, 1, pp. 13-26, DOI: 10.1080/14725860220137345
  35. M. Hill (2006), «Children’s voices on ways of having a voice: Children’s and young people’s perspectives on methods used in research and consultation», Childhood, 13, 1, pp. 69-89, DOI: 10.1177/0907568206059972
  36. K. Inagaki, G. Hatano (2006), «Young Children’s Conception of the Biological World», Current Di- rections in Psychological Science, 15, 4, pp. 177-81,
  37. L.G. Irwin, J. Johnson (2005), «Interviewing young children: Explicating our practices and di- lemmas», Qualitative Health Research, 15, 6, pp. 821-31, DOI: 10.1177/1049732304273862
  38. H. Kay, V.E. Cree, K. Tisdall, J. Wallace (2003), «At the edge: Negotiating boundaries in re- search with children and young people», Forum, Qualitative Social Research, 4, 2, p. 33,
  39. S. Komulainen (2007), «The ambiguity of the child’s “voice” in social research», Childhood, 14, 1, pp. 11-28, DOI: 10.1177/0907568207068561
  40. B. Lévi-Strauss (1969), Les structures elemetaires elementaire de la parente, Paris, Mouton; tr. it. Le strutture elementari della parentela, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1984.
  41. W. Lignier, C., Lomba, N. Renahy (2012), «La différenciation sociale des enfants», Politix, 99, pp. 9-21,
  42. W. Lignier, J. Pagis (2017), L’enfance de l’ordre. Comment les enfants perçoivent le monde social, Paris, Seuil.
  43. A. Loretoni (2018), «Un femminismo intersezionale e multidisciplinare», Iride, 84, 2, pp. 307-
  44. 18, DOI: 10.1414/91139
  45. R. Mallon (2016), The construction of human kinds, Oxford, Oxford University Press, doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755678.001.0001.
  46. F. Martire (2010), «Lo studio empirico dell’intervista. Tendenze recenti nel dibattito metodo- logico», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 31, 91, pp. 137-57, DOI: 10.3280/SR2010-091007
  47. B. Mayall (2002), Towards a sociology for childhood: Thinking from children’s lives, Maiden- head, Open University Press.
  48. R.K Merton, M.F Lowenthal, P.L. Kendall (1990), The Focused Interview. A Manual of Pro- blems and Procedures, New York, Free Press, 2nd ed.
  49. D.K. Padgett, B.T. Smith, K. Derejko, B.F. Henwood, E. Tiderington (2013), «A picture is worth...? Photo elicitation interviewing with formerly homeless adults», Qualitative Health Research, 23, 11, pp. 1435-44, DOI: 10.1177/1049732313507752
  50. M.Q. Patton (2002), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2nd ed.
  51. B.A. Poku, A.­L. Caress, S. Kirk (2019), «The opportunities and challenges of using photo­eli- citation in child-centered constructivist grounded theory research», International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1, p. 7, DOI: 10.1177/1609406919851627
  52. A. Pretto (2015), «A type of interview with photos: the bipolar photo elicitation», L’Année sociologique, 65, 1, pp. 169-90,
  53. S. Punch (2002), «Research with children: The same or different from research with adults?»,
  54. Childhood, 9, 3, pp. 321-41, DOI: 10.1177/0907568202009003005
  55. V. Ramos, M. Truninger, S. Goulart Cardoso, F.R. Augusto (2022), «Researching children’s food practices in contexts of deprivation: ethical and methodological chal- lenges», International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35, 1, pp. 1-17, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2020.1797211
  56. V.M. Richard, M.K.E. Lahman (2015), «Photo­elicitation: reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits», International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38, 1, pp. 3-22, DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073
  57. G. Rose (2012), Visual methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, London, Sage.
  58. J. Samuels (2004), «Breaking the Ethnographer’s Frames: Reflections on the Use of Photo Eli- citation in Understanding Sri Lankan Monastic Culture», American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 12, pp. 1528-550, DOI: 10.1177/0002764204266238
  59. D. Torre, J. Murphy (2015), «A different lens: Changing perspectives using Photo Elicitation
  60. Interviews», Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 111,
  61. J. Tudge (2008), The everyday lives of young children: Culture, class, and child rearing in diverse societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  62. G. Valentine (1999), «Being seen and heard? The ethical complexities of working with children and young people at home and at school», Ethics, Place and Environment, 2, 2, pp. 141-55, DOI: 10.1080/1366879X.1999.11644243
  63. L. Wacquant (2014), «Mettere l’habitus al suo posto», Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2, pp. 329-48.
  64. S. Weinger (2000), «Economic status: Middle class and poor children’s views», Children & Society, 14, 2, pp. 135-46,
  65. R.R. Williams, K. Whitehouse. (2015), «Photo elicitation and the visual sociology of religion», Review of Religious Research, 57, 2, pp. 303-18,

  • Children's social categorisation practices and family background Agnese Desideri, in WELFARE E ERGONOMIA 2/2024 pp.43
    DOI: 10.3280/WE2023-002004

Agnese Desideri, L’adozione dell’intervista con foto-stimolazione con minori: accorgimenti e stratagemmi in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 130/2023, pp 89-107, DOI: 10.3280/SR2023-130005