Multi-level labelling: too complex for consumers?

Journal title ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE
Author/s Ramona Weinrich, Annabell Franz, Achim Spiller
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/2
Language English Pages 18 P. 155-172 File size 161 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2016-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

For many consumers, sustainability attributes are a relevant consideration concerning the purchase decision. However, as more food labels enter the retail market it is becoming increasingly difficult for consumers to evaluate the underlying meaning of these labels. The most common labels communicating sustainable values tend to be binary. However, many attributes, such as animal welfare, are of a continuous nature. One solution to communicate differentiated information about process or product standards is by using multi-level labels, which indicate various levels of standards. However, while multi-level labels may help consumers realize the differences in production or process qualities, they may also cause confusion since they convey more complex information. Therefore, the impact of multi-level labels on consumers’ comprehension remains unclear. The primary objective of this paper is to test whether consumers can easily comprehend a multi-level labelling approach by using the case of animal welfare standards. This paper will also assess whether a multi-level label could be an effective tool to communicate information about standards and enhance consumers’ willingness to pay. The results show that when an explanation about the levels of the label is provided, there is an increasing willingness to pay for products with higher standards. Hence, a multi-level label can work if information is provided and is thus an adequate tool to communicate sustainable and ethical values.

Keywords: Labelling, animal welfare, sustainability, ethical consumption, willingness to pay

Jel codes: Q13

  • Backing biodiversity? German consumers’ views on a multi-level biodiversity-labeling scheme for beef from grazing-based production systems Ekaterina Stampa, Katrin Zander, in Journal of Cleaner Production 133471/2022 pp.133471
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133471
  • The Hierarchical Utility of Credence Attributes of Orange Marmalade: What do Consumers Look for in a Multi-Claim Food Product? Giuseppe Di Vita, Raffaele Zanchini, Daniela Spina, Gioacchino Pappalardo, Emanuele Schimmenti, Mario D’Amico, in Journal of Marketing Communications /2025 pp.679
    DOI: 10.1080/13527266.2023.2273539
  • How green is your packaging—A comparative international study of cues consumers use to recognize environmentally friendly packaging Carsten Herbes, Christoph Beuthner, Iris Ramme, in International Journal of Consumer Studies /2020 pp.258
    DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12560

Ramona Weinrich, Annabell Franz, Achim Spiller, Multi-level labelling: too complex for consumers? in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2016, pp 155-172, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2016-002004