Raúl Prebisch’s Influence on Contemporary Development Studies: A Review of Recent Literature (2010-2021)

Journal title HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Author/s Fernando García-Quero
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2024/2
Language English Pages 32 P. 5-36 File size 218 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2024-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This research examines the influence of Prebisch’s work on contemporary academic debates in development studies. To this end, a systematic literature review of studies published in the main development studies journals over the period 20102021 was conducted. A total of 139 articles were located and analyzed thematically. The articles were categorized according to their analytical approach, bibliographic citations, themes, treatment (anecdotal or deep), and misunderstandings and omissions of Prebisch’s thought. With some exceptions, most of the articles allude to Prebisch in an anecdotal way, without delving into his thought and his extensive work. The results reveal a notable lack of knowledge about a pioneering author in development studies, especially regarding the final stage of his thought in which he tried to formulate a global theory of development. Despite this, Prebisch’s thought connects with lines of research at the frontier of knowledge on the entrepreneurial state, ecologically unequal exchange, or post-extractivisms. A research and political agenda focused on his legacy requires placing at the center of the development debate issues such as the social use of surplus, the concentration of means of production, technological progress, industrialization, environmental challenges and, above all, the ethics of development.

Keywords: pioneers of development, peripheral capitalism, highest impact journals, ECLAC

Jel codes: B20, O10, N16

  1. Amsden A. H. (2004). Import substitution in high-tech industries: Prebisch lives in Asia!, Revista CEPAL (CEPAL Review), 82, 75-89.
  2. Ahumada J.M., Torres M. (2024). Dependency Theory: A Theory of Underdevelopment from Latin America to the World. In: S.S. Jodhka, B. Rehbein (eds.). Global Handbook of Inequality. Cham., Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-03097417-6_80-2
  3. Akbulut B., Adaman F., Madra Y. M. (2015). The decimation and displacement of development economics. Development and Change, 46(4), 733-761.
  4. Andrade D. (2022). Neoliberal extractivism: Brazil in the twenty-first century. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 793-816.
  5. Andreoni A., Chang H. J. (2017). Bringing production and employment back into development: Alice Amsden’s legacy for a new developmentalist agenda. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(1), 173-187.
  6. Arndt H. W. (1985). The Origins of Structuralism. World Development, 13(2), 151159.
  7. Bárcena A., Bielschowsky R., Torres M. (2022). El pensamiento de la CEPAL (2009-2018): hacia una estrategia neoestructuralista de desarrollo basada en un enfoque de derechos. El Trimestre Económico, 89(353), 73-109.
  8. Beteta H., Moreno-Brid J. C. (2012). El desarrollo en las ideas de la CEPAL. Economía Unam, 9(27), 76-90.
  9. Bielschowsky R. (2010). Sesenta años de la CEPAL y el pensamiento reciente. In Sesenta años de la CEPAL: textos seleccionados del decenio 1998-2008, pp. 15-78. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI y Naciones Unidas.
  10. Bielschowsky R. (1998). Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña. In Cincuenta años de pensamiento en la CEPAL: textos seleccionados, vol. 1, pp. 9-61. Santiago, Fondo de Cultura Económica/CEPAL.
  11. Block F. (2014). Polanyian Themes: From Budapest to the Caribbean. Development and Change, 45(6), 1449-1456.
  12. Braun V., Clarke V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K. J. Sher (eds.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/13620-004
  13. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  14. Büscher B., Feola G., Fischer A., Fletcher R., Gerber J. F., Harcourt W., Wiskerke
  15. H. (2021). Planning for a world beyond COVID-19: Five pillars for post-neoliberal development. World Development, 140, 105357.
  16. Byrne J. P., Fazio G., Fiess N. (2013). Primary commodity prices: Co-movements, common factors and fundamentals. Journal of Development Economics, 101, 1626.
  17. Calcagno A. (2023). How Industrialization Became the Core of Raúl Prebisch’s. Thought. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1-22. DOI: 10.1017/S1053837222000670
  18. Calcagno A. (2021) The roots and history of the structuralist development theory through the prism of Prebisch and ECLAC. Ginebra, Université de Genève.
  19. CEPAL (2019). Raúl Prebisch y su faceta de banquero central y doctor monetario (textos publicados e inéditos de la década de 1940). Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Matías Vernengo, y Miguel Torres(ed.).Santiago, CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b0c80ade-f904-49fb97b2-5f9b51bc73d6/content.
  20. CEPAL (1987). Raúl Prebisch: un aporte al estudio de su pensamiento. Santiago de Chile, CEPAL.
  21. Cimoli M. (2023). Post globalization and reindustrialization in Latin America. The conditionality of industrial policy and “Keynesian Egalitarianism”. Ensayos Económicos, Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department, 1(82), 6-26.
  22. Chakraborty S. (2012). Is Export Expansion of Manufactured Goods an Escape Route from Terms of Trade Deterioration of Developing Countries?. Journal of South Asian Development, 7(2), 81-108.
  23. Chandrasekhar C. P. (2015). A window of enlightenment? Revisiting Bretton Woods to reinterpret the history of hegemony. Development and Change, 46(6), 14011414.
  24. Chuku C., Simpasa A., Oduor J. (2018). Macroeconomic Consequences of Commodity Price Fluctuations in African Economies. African Development Review, 30(4), 329-345.
  25. Cypher J. (2010). South America’s Commodities Boom: Developmental Opportunity or Path Dependent Reversion?. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 30(3-4), 635-662.
  26. Daruich D., Easterly W., and Reshef A. (2019). The surprising instability of export specializations. Journal of Development Economics, 137, 36-65.
  27. Dávila-Fernández M., Amado A. (2015). Thirlwall’s law and the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis: an assessment of the dynamics of terms-of-trade in a balance-of-payments-constraint growth model. Economia e Sociedade, 24(53), 87-119.
  28. Di Filippo A. (1986). Desarrollo económico y transformación social: el legado de Prebisch. El Trimestre Económico, 53(212), 883-886.
  29. Domínguez R. (2019). Samir Amin (1931-2018) y el desarrollo desigual. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 8(2), 230-254.
  30. Domínguez R. (2018). Theotônio dos Santos (1936-2018) y la reconstrucción de la economía política del desarrollo. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 7(1), 192-213.
  31. Domínguez R., León M., Samaniego J., Sunkel O. (2019). Recursos naturales, medio ambiente y sostenibilidad 70 años de pensamiento de la CEPAL. Santiago de Chile, Libros de la CEPAL.
  32. Dosman E. (2010). La vida y la época de Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986. Madrid, Marcial Pons. Traductora Carmen Martínez Gimeno. [Dosman E. J. (2008). The life and times of Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press].
  33. ECLAC (2014). Compacts for Equality. Towards a Sustainable Future. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
  34. Erten B. Ocampo J. A. (2013). Super Cycles of Commodity Prices Since the MidNineteenth Century. World Development, 44, 14-30,
  35. Farooki M. Z. (2012). China’s metals demand and commodity prices: A case of disruptive development. European Journal of Development Research, 24(1), 56-70. Feldman Z., Sandoval M. (2018). Metric Power and the Academic Self: Neoliberalism, Knowledge and Resistance in the British University. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(1), 214-33.
  36. Ferrer A. (2010). Raúl Prebisch y el dilema del desarrollo en el mundo global. Revista CEPAL, 101, 7-15.
  37. Fischer A. M. (2018). On the origins and legacies of really existing capitalism: In conversation with Kari Polanyi Levitt. Development and Change, 542-572.
  38. Fukuda-Parr S., Muchhala B. (2020). The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations. World Development, 126, 104706.
  39. Furtado C. (1989). La fantasía organizada. Buenos Aires, Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires (EUDEBA). Traducción del original en portugués (1985) por Eleonora Osta Ptak.
  40. García-Quero F., López Castellano F. (2022). From the mainstream economics research frontier towards critical institutional political economy. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 42, 619-637.
  41. Geenen S. (2019). Gold and godfathers: Local content, politics, and capitalism in extractive industries. World Development, 123
  42. Ghoshray A. (2011). A reexamination of trends in primary commodity prices. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 242-251.
  43. Gudynas E. (2023). Post-extractivist transitions: Concepts, sequences and examples. In: H. Veltmeyer, A. Ezquerro-Cañete (eds.). From Extractivism to Sustainability (pp. 221-240). London, Routledge.
  44. Gudynas E. (2021). Extractivisms: Politics, Economy and Ecology. Canada, Fernwood Publishing.
  45. Gurrieri A. (2001). The ideas of young Prebisch, CEPAL Review, 75, LC/G.2150-P, Santiago, Chile, December.
  46. Gurrieri A. (ed.) (1982). La obra de Prebisch en la cepal. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  47. Gurrieri A. (1981). La Economía Política de Raúl Prebisch. CEPAL. -Accesible aquí: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/33090/S8100770_es. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  48. Harvey D. I., Kellard N. M., Madsen J.B., Wohar M. E. (2017). Long-Run Commodity Prices, Economic Growth, and Interest Rates: 17th Century to the Present Day. World Development, 89, 57-70.
  49. Harvey D. I., Kellard N. M., Madsen J. B., Wohar M. E. (2010). The prebisch-singer hypothesis: four centuries of evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat., 92 (2), 367-377.
  50. Hodara J. (1988). El capitalismo periférico tardío según Prebisch: reflexiones. El Trimestre Económico, 55(219), 579-604.
  51. Hopenhayn B. (1982). Algunas notas sobre el “Capitalism periférico” de Raúl Prebisch. Desarrollo Económico, 22(86), 287-294.
  52. Horner R., Schindler S., Haberly D., Aoyama Y. (2018). Globalisation, uneven development and the North-South ‘big switch’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 17-33.
  53. Infante-Amate J., Mesa A. U., Aragay E. T. (2020). Las venas abiertas de América Latina en la era del antropoceno: un estudio biofísico del comercio exterior (1900-2016). Diálogos Revista Electrónica de Historia, 21(2), 177-214.
  54. Infante-Amate J., Urrego-Mesa A., Pinero P., Tello E. (2022). The open veins of Latin America: Long-term physical trade flows (1900-2016). Global Environmental Change, 76, 102579.
  55. Irwin D. A. (2021). The rise and fall of import substitution. World Development, 139.
  56. Jarrín-V. P., Falconí F., Cango P., Ramos-Martin J. (2021). Knowledge gaps in Latin America and the Caribbean and economic development. World Development, 146.
  57. Jauretche A. (1984). El Plan Prebisch: retorno al coloniaje. Buenos Aires, Edit. Peña Lillo.
  58. Karshenas M. (2016). Power, Ideology and Global Development: On the Origins, Evolution and Achievements of UNCTAD. Development and Change, 47(4), 664-685.
  59. Kay C. (2020) Theotonio Dos Santos (1936-2018): The Revolutionary Intellectual Who Pioneered Dependency Theory. Development and Change, 51 (2), pp. 599630.
  60. Krugman P. (1993). Toward a counter-counterrevolution in development theory. In: L.H. Summers, S. Shah (eds.). Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. Washington DC, The World Bank, pp. 15-38.
  61. Kvangraven I. H., Styve M. D., Kufakurinani U., Santanta F. (eds) (2017). Dialogues on Development – Dependency Theory. New York, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
  62. Kvangraven I. H. (2021). Beyond the stereotype: Restating the relevance of the dependency research programme. Development and Change, 52(1), 76-112.
  63. Kvangraven I. H. (2020). Impoverished economics? A critical assessment of the new gold standard. World Development, 127, 104813.
  64. Lefeber L. (2010). Book Review. Edgar J. Dosman. The Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986. Montreal: McGill‐Queen’s University Press, 2008. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(4) (July 2010), pp. 805-808.
  65. Lewis A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22, 139-191.
  66. Lim S., Prakash A. (2017). Do Economic Problems at Home Undermine Worker Safety Abroad?: A Panel Study, 1980-2009. World Development, 96, 562-577.
  67. Lira M. (1986). La larga marcha de Prebisch hacia la crítica del capitalismo periférico y su teoría de la transformación de la sociedad. El Trimestre Económico, 53(211), 451-476.
  68. López Castellano F. (2024). Neoliberalism, institutional change and the new culture of the university professoriate: the Spanish case. Studies in Higher Education, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2331071
  69. López Castellano F., García-Quero F. (2022). Nuevas teorizaciones y nuevas agendas en los estudios del desarrollo. Revista de Economía Crítica, 33, 42-57.
  70. Madrueño R., Tezanos S. (2018). The contemporary development discourse: Analysing the influence of development studies’ journals. World Development, 109, 334-345.
  71. Magariños M. (1991). Diálogos con Raúl Prebisch. Mexico: Banco Nacional de Commercio Exterior/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  72. Mallorquin C. (2017). Lord Keynes después de su muerte, según Raúl Prebisch. Estudios críticos del desarrollo, 5, 173-228.
  73. Mann L., Iazzolino G. (2021). From development state to corporate leviathan: historicizing the infrastructural performativity of digital platforms within Kenyan agriculture. Development and Change, 52(4), 829-854.
  74. Margulis M. E. (ed.) (2017). The global political economy of Raúl Prebisch. New York and London, Routledge.
  75. Martínez Alier J. (2013). Soñando con un Prebisch ecológico, La Jornada, Ciudad de México. -Available here: https://www.jornada.com.mx/2013/08/31/opinion/ 020a1mun.
  76. Martínez-Alier J. (2012). Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(1), 51-73.
  77. Mastini R., Kallis G., Hickel J. (2021). A green new deal without growth?. Ecological Economics, 179, 106832.
  78. Mazzucato M., Penna C. C. R. (2016). Beyond market failures: The market creating and shaping roles of state investment banks. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(4), 305-326.
  79. Meire G. (2001). In G. M. Meier, J. E. Stiglitz (eds.). Frontiers of development economics: the future in perspective. pp. 13-50 World Bank Publications.
  80. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G. and The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097.
  81. Morvaridi B., Hughes C. (2018). South-south cooperation and neoliberal hegemony in a post‐aid world. Development and Change, 49(3), 867-892.
  82. Nabar‐Bhaduri S. (2018). Not Sustainable: India’s Trade and Current Account Deficits. Development and Change, 49(1), 116-145.
  83. Naudé W. (2011). Entrepreneurship is not a binding constraint on growth and development in the poorest countries. World Development, 39(1), 33-44.
  84. Nem Singh J., Ovadia J. S. (2018). The theory and practice of building developmental states in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 39(6), 1033-1055.
  85. Orihuela J. C. (2013). How do “Mineral-States” Learn? Path-Dependence, Networks, and Policy Change in the Development of Economic Institutions. World Development, 43: 138-148.
  86. Ocampo J. A. (2001). Raúl Prebisch y la agenda del desarrollo en los albores del siglo XXI. CEPAL, Seminario “La Teoria del Desarrollo en los Albores del Siglo XXI”, Evento conmemorativo del centenario del nacimiento de Don Raúl Prebisch, Santiago de Chile, 28 y 29 de agosto de 2001.
  87. Paz P. (2021). Juan Noyola Vázquez: precursor de la vertiente progresista del pensamiento estructuralista latinoamericano. El trimestre económico, 88(350), 677-694. Artículo original publicado en Investigación Económica, 43(170), 313-330.
  88. Perez-Aleman P., Alves F. C. (2017). Reinventing industrial policy at the frontier: catalysing learning and innovation in Brazil. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(1), 151-171.
  89. Pérez Caldentey E., Vernengo M. (2019). Banca central y política monetaria en el centro y en la periferia: Prebisch como “banquero central” y “doctor monetario”. In Raúl Prebisch y su faceta de banquero central y doctor monetario (textos publicados e inéditos de la década de 1940). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. -https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/45034-raul-prebisch- su-faceta-banquero-central-doctor-monetario-textos-publicados.
  90. Pérez Caldentey E., Vernengo M. (2015). Reading Keynes in Buenos Aires: Prebisch and the Dynamics of Capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40 (6), 17251741.
  91. Pérez Caldentey E., Sunkel O., Torres M. (2012). Raúl Prebisch (1901-1986): Un recorrido por las etapas de su pensamiento sobre el desarrollo económico. CE-PAL. -Accesible: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40062/ Prebisch_etapas_pensamiento.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  92. Pérez-Rincón M. A. (2006). Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: Towards an ecological “Prebisch thesis”. Ecological economics, 59(4), 519529.
  93. Pipkin S. (2017). From experience to experiment: sources of ownership in processes of knowledge formation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(1), 127-149.
  94. Polanyi Levitt K. (2005). Raul Prebisch and Arthur Lewis: The Basic Dualities of Development Economics. In: K.S. Jomo (ed.). The Pioneers of Development Economics, pp. 193-208. London, Zed.
  95. Pollock D. H., Kerner D., Love J. L. (2001). Entrevista inédita a Prebisch: logros y deficiencias de la CEPAL. Revista de la CEPAL, 75, 9-24.
  96. Prebisch R. (1991). Obras Completas, 1919-1949 [CompleteWorks, 1919-1949], Vol. 2. Buenos Aires, Fundación Prebisch.
  97. Prebisch R. (1993). Obras Completas, 1919-1949 [Complete Works, 1919-1949], Vol. 4. Buenos Aires, Fundación Prebisch.
  98. Prebisch R. (1988). Dependencia, interdependencia y desarrollo. Revista de la CEPAL, 34, 205:212.
  99. Prebisch R. (1983). Cinco etapas de mi pensamiento sobre el desarrollo. El trimestre económico, 5(198), 1077-1096.
  100. Prebisch R. (1981). Capitalismo Periférico: Crisis y Transformación. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  101. Prebisch R. (1980). Biosphere and development. CEPAL Review (12), 69-84. -Available here: https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/013b97 8a-bf2c-4a4f-a6e8-9276e3b19b3e/content.
  102. Prebisch R. (1969). Marcha hacia el Mercado Común Latinoamericano. ILPES, Naciones Unidas. -Available here: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/ handle/11362/32875/094_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  103. Prebisch R. (1964). Towards a New Trade Policy for Development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), New York.
  104. Prebisch R. (1963). Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano: con un apéndice sobre el falso dilema entre desarrollo económico y estabilidad monetaria. Ciudad de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  105. Prebisch R. (1959). Commercial Policy in the Underdeveloped Countries. The American Economic Review, 49(2), 251-273.
  106. Prebisch R. (1954). International cooperation in a Latin American development policy. New York, United Nations.
  107. Prebisch R. (1952), Problemas teóricos y prácticos del crecimiento económico (E/CN.12/221). Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
  108. Prebisch R. (1951), Crecimiento, desequilibrio y disparidades: interpretación del proceso del desarrollo económico, Estudio económico de América Latina (E/CN.12/164/Rev.1). Nueva York, Naciones Unidas.
  109. Prebisch R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York, United Nations.
  110. Prebisch R. (1949). El desarrollo económico de la American Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. Estudio Economico de la America Latina. Santiago, CEPAL.
  111. Prebisch R. (1947). Introducción a Keynes. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  112. Rada C. (2014). ‘Another Such Victory and We are Undone’: Addressing Fallacies of Reasoning in Contemporary Policy Making. Development and Change, 45(5), 1172-1192.
  113. Radley B. (2020). The end of the African mining enclave? Domestic marginalization and labour fragmentation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Development and change, 51(3), 794-816.
  114. Reinert E. S., Ghosh J., Kattel R. (eds.) (2016). Handbook of alternative theories of economic development. UK, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  115. Rival L., Muradian R., Larrea C. (2015). New trends confronting old structures or old threats frustrating new hopes? ECLAC’s compacts for equality. Development and Change, 46(4), 961-978.
  116. Romero J. P., Gramkow C. (2021). Economic complexity and greenhouse gas emissions. World Development, 139.
  117. Saad Filho A., and Tomkinson J. K. (2017). Walking the tightrope: UNCTAD, development and finance-driven globalisation. Development and Change, 48(Forum 2017), 1168-1181.
  118. Saith A. (2018). Ajit Singh (1940-2015), the Radical Cambridge Economist: Anti‐ imperialist Advocate of Third World Industrialization. Development and Change, 49(2), 561-628.
  119. Sánchez Contreras J., Matarán A. (2023). Colonialismo energético. Territorios de sacrificio para la transición energética. Barcelona, Icaria.
  120. Sember F. (2018). Challenging a Money Doctor: Raúl Prebisch vs Sir Otto Niemeyer on the Creation of the Argentine Central Bank. In Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, 36C, 55-79. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/S0743-41542018000036C004
  121. Singer H.W. (1950) U.S. foreign investment in underdeveloped areas: The distribution of gainsbetween investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, 40(2), 473-485.
  122. Singer H. W. (1949). Economic Progress in Underdeveloped Countries. Social Research: An International Quarterly of Political and Social Science, 16(1), 1-11.
  123. Sneyd A. (2014). When governance gets going: Certifying ‘better cotton’ and ‘better sugarcane’. Development and Change, 45(2), 231-256.
  124. Sotelsek Salem D. F. (2008). El pensamiento de Raúl Prebisch: una visión alternativa. Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 23(3), 615-636.
  125. Spagnolo A. (1982). Reseña de “Capitalismo periférico. Crisis y transformación” de Raúl Prebisch. El Trimestre Económico, 49(194), 510-514.
  126. Spinola D. (2020). Uneven development and the balance of payments constrained model: Terms of trade, economic cycles, and productivity catching-up. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54, 220-232.
  127. Stockhammer E. (2022). Macroeconomic ingredients for a growth model analysis for peripheral economies: a post-Keynesian-structuralist approach. New Political Economy, 28 (4), 628-645.
  128. Storm S. (2017). The Political Economy of Industrialization: Introduction to Development and Change Virtual Issue. Development and Change.
  129. Storm S. (2015). Structural change. Development and Change, 46(4), 666-699. Streeten P. (1981). Development perspectives. London, Springer.
  130. Street J. H. (1987). Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986: an appreciation. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(2), 649-659.
  131. Sunna C. (2014). “Raúl Prebisch and the Keynesian Theory in Latin America”. In J.
  132. L. Cardoso, M. C. Marcuzzo, M. E. Romero Sotelo (eds.). Economic Development and Global Crisis, The Latin American Economy in Historical Perspective. London, Routledge, 131-145.
  133. Thayer R. (2003). Life Place: Bioregional Thought and Practice. Berkeley, University of California Press.
  134. Thakur R. (2016). The Marginalization of Tibetans in Tibet: Rethinking the Development Story. Development and Change, 47(1), 203-217.
  135. Toye J. (2014). Assessing the G77: 50 Years after UNCTAD and 40 Years after the NIEO. Third World Quarterly, 35(10), 1759-1774.
  136. Toye J., and Toye R. (2003). The Origins and Interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer Thesis. History of Political Economy, 35(3), 437-67.
  137. Veltmeyer H., Ezquerro-Cañete A. (2023). Agro-extractivism. The Journal of Peasant Studies. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2023.2218802
  138. Vernengo M. (2013). Raúl Prebisch: A peripheral economist at centre stage. Development and Change, 44(5), 1207-1219.
  139. Winkelried D. (2018). Unit roots, flexible trends, and the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 132, 1-17.

Fernando García-Quero, Raúl Prebisch’s Influence on Contemporary Development Studies: A Review of Recent Literature (2010-2021) in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 2/2024, pp 5-36, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2024-002001