Datacasting. The algorithmic flow experience in streaming platforms and Tik- Tok

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE
Author/s Alberto Marinelli, Ellenrose Firth
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2024/67
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 20-42 File size 159 KB
DOI 10.3280/SC2024-067002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article advances the idea of a new paradigm shift – from personcasting to datacasting – when thinking about the experience of watching audiovisual content both on streaming platforms and media sharing platforms. We consider the platformisation of television to look at the way in which user agency changes within an increasingly datafied media ecosystem. The main focus is on TikTok as it is the platform that best exemplifies the passage from an on-demand flow of content (YouTube, Netflix) to an entirely algorithmic flow. We introduce two main themes that emerge from the analysis of 20 qualitative interviews: TV on TikTok and TikTok as TV in order to fully understand how users watch content on the platform, as well as the impact the automated flow has on the level of entertainment given by the app.

Keywords: algoritmic flow, datacasting, TikTok, streaming platforms, FAST channels.

  1. Jenner M. (2020), Researching Binge-Watching, in «Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies», Vol. 15(3), pp. 267–279, DOI: 10.1177/1749602020935012
  2. Johnson C. (2019), Online TV, Routledge, Oxon & New York.
  3. Johnson C. (2020), The Appisation of Television: TV Apps, Discoverability and the Software, Device and Platform Ecologies of the Internet Era, in « Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies», Vol. 15(2), pp. 165-182, DOI: 10.1177/1749602020911823
  4. Jones C. (2023), How to Train your Algorithm: The Struggle for Public Control Over Private Audience Commodities on Tiktok, in «Media, Culture & Society», 45(6), pp. 1192–1209. DOI: 10.1177/01634437231159555
  5. Karizat N., Delmonaco D., Eslami M., Andalibi N. (2021), Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic Resistance, in «Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction», 5, Issue CSCW2, pp. 1-44. DOI: 10.1145/3476046
  6. Lobato R. (2018), Rethinking International TV Flows Research in the Age of Netflix, in «Television & New Media», 19(3), pp. 241-25, DOI: 10.1177/1527476417708245
  7. Lobato R. (2019), Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution, New York University Press, New York; trad. it. (2019) Netflix Nations. Geografia della distribuzione digitale, Minimum Fax, Milano.
  8. Lotz A.D. (2007), The Television will be Revolutionized, New York University Press, New York.
  9. Lotz A.D (2021), Media Disrupted: Surviving Pirates, Cannibals, and Streaming War Pirates, The Mit Press, Cambridge MA; trad. it (2022) Pirati, cannibali e guerre dello streaming, Einaudi, Torino.
  10. Luders M., Schanke Sundet V. (2022), Conceptualizing the Experiential Affordances of Watching Online TV, in «Television & New Media», Vol. 23(4), pp. 335-351, DOI: 10.1177/15274764211010943
  11. Mullen M. (2002), The Fall and Rise of Cable Narrowcasting, in «Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies», n.8, pp. 62-83, DOI: 10.1177/135485650200800106
  12. Andò R., Marinelli A. (2018), Television(s). Come cambia l’esperienza televisiva tra tecnologie convergenti e pratiche social, Guerini scientifica, Milano.
  13. Andrejevic M. (2009), The Twenty-First-Century Telescreen, in Turner G., Tay J. (eds), Television Studies After TV. Understanding Television in the Post-Broadcast Era, Routledge, New York & London, pp. 31-41.
  14. Bhandari A., Bimo S. Why’s Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media, in «Social Media + Society», n.8(1), 2022, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221086241
  15. Boeker M., Urman, A. An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok, in «arXiv e-prints», 2022, DOI: 10.1145/3485447.3512102
  16. Bucher T. The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms, in «Information, Communication & Society», 20(1), 2017, pp. 30–44. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
  17. Caldwell J. (1995), Televisuality: Style, Crisis, and Authority in American Television, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
  18. CBC (2023) Sludge Content is Consuming TikTok. Why Aren't we Talking About it? https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/sludge-content-1.6716185 (21 settembre 2024).
  19. Chalaby J. K. (2023a), The Streaming Industry and the Platform Economy: An Analysis, in «Media, Culture & Society», n.46(3), pp. 1-20 DOI: 10.1177/01634437231210439
  20. Chalaby J. K. (2023b), Television in the Streaming Era. The Global Shift, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  21. Cox C. M. (2018), Programming – Flow in the Convergence of Digital Media Platforms and Television., in «Critical Studies in Television», 13(4), pp. 438-454. DOI: 10.1177/1749602018796681
  22. D’heer E., Courtois C. (2016), The Changing Dynamics of Television Consumption in the Multimedia Living Room, in «Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies», vol. 22(1), pp. 3-17, DOI: 10.1177/1354856514543451
  23. Evens T., Henderickx A., De Marez L. (2021), Generation Stream: The Audiovisual Repertoire of Teenagers, in «Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media», vol. 65(2), pp. 185–204, DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2021.1944146
  24. Faltesek D., Graalum E., Breving B., Knudsen E., Lucas J., Young S., Varas Zambrano F.E. (2023), TikTok as Television, in «Social Media + Society», 9(3), pp. 1-13, DOI: 10.1177/20563051231194576
  25. Fast Company (2023), Is TikTok the Future of Television? https://www.fastcompany.com/90949672/tiktok-future-of-television-peacock-streaming (21 settembre 2024).
  26. Gaw F. (2022), Algorithmic Logics and the Construction of Cultural Taste of the Netflix Recommender System, in «Media, Culture & Society» Vol. 44(4), pp. 706–725, DOI: 10.1177/01634437211053767
  27. Gitelman L. (2006), Always Already New. Media, History, and the Data of Culture, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
  28. Gomez-Uribe C. A., Hunt N. (2016), The Netflix Recommender System: Algorithms, Business Value, and Innovation, in «ACM Transaction on Management Information Systems», vol. 6, DOI: 10.1145/2843948
  29. Hallinan B., Striphas T. (2016), Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the Production of Algorithmic Culture, in «New Media & Society», vol. 18(1), pp. 117-137, DOI: 10.1177/1461444814538646
  30. Holt J., Sanson K. (eds.) (2014), Connected Viewing: Selling, Streaming, & Sharing in the Digital Era, Routledge, New York.
  31. Jenner M. (2016), Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and Binge-watching, in «New Media & Society», vol. 18(2), pp. 257-273, DOI: 10.1177/1461444814541523.
  32. Jenner M. (2018), Netflix and the Re-invention of Television, Palgrave, London.
  33. Pajkovic N. (2022) Algorithms and Taste-Making: Exposing the Netflix Recommender System’s Operational Logics, in «Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies», Vol. 28(1), pp. 214–235, 10.1177/13548565211014464.
  34. Parisi S., Firth E (2023), «Il magico mondo dell’algoritmo». Immaginario, percezione e interazione degli utenti di TikTok con l’algoritmo di piattaforma, in «Sociologia della comunicazione», n. 66, pp. 60-76 DOI: 10.3280/SC2023-066001
  35. Pietrobruno S. (2018), YouTube Flow and the Transmission of Heritage: The Interplay of Users, Content, and Algorithms, in «Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies», Vol. 24(6), pp. 523-537. DOI: 10.1177/1354856516680339
  36. Schellewald A. (2022) Theorizing “Stories About Algorithms” as a Mechanism in the Formation and Maintenance of Algorithmic Imaginaries, in «Social Media + Society», 8(1), pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221077025
  37. Siles I., Meléndez-Moran A. (2021) «The Most Aggressive of Algorithms»: User Awareness of and Attachment to TikTok’s Content Personalization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA) May 27-31, 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/10669/83230 (15 settembre 2023).
  38. Siles I., Valerio-Alfaro L., Meléndez-Moran A. (2022) Learning to Like TikTok . . . and not: Algorithm Awareness as Process, in «New Media & Society», 0(0), pp. 1-17, DOI: 10.1177/14614448221138973
  39. Strangelove M. (2015), Post-TV: Piracy, Cord-Cutting, and the Future of Television, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  40. Uricchio W. (2004), Television’s Next Generation: Technology/Interface/Culture/Flow, in Olsson, J. & Spigel, L. (eds), Television after TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, Duke University Press, Durham & London.
  41. - (2009), The Future of a Medium Once Known as Television, in Snikkars P., Vonderau, P. (eds), The YouTube Reader, Wallflower Press, London, pp. 24-39.
  42. - (2010), Tv as Time Machine: Television’s Changing Heterochronic Regimes and the Production of History, in Gripsrud J., Relocating Television. Television in the Digital Context, Routledge, New York, pp. 27-40.
  43. van Dijck J. (2013), YouTube Beyond Technology and Cultural Form, in de Valck M., Teurlings J. (eds), After the Break. Television Theory Today, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam pp. 147-159.
  44. van Dijck J., Poell T., de Waal M. (2018), The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press; trad it. (2019), Platform Society. Valori pubblici e società connessa, Guerini scientifica, Milano.
  45. van Es K. (2023) Netflix & Big Data: The Strategic Ambivalence of an Entertainment Company, in «Television & New Media» Vol. 24(6), pp. 656-672, DOI: 10.1177/15274764221125745
  46. Van Esler M. (2020) In Plain Sight: Online TV Interfaces as Branding, in «Television & New Media», Published electronically DOI: 10.1177/1527476420917104
  47. Vanity Fair (2022) Keep the Meter Running is one of TikTok’s best new series, https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/12/tiktok-show-keep-the-meter-running-interview (21 settembre 2024).
  48. Wall Street Journal (2021), Investigation: How TikTok's Algorithm Figures Out Your Deepest Desires, https://www.wsj.com/video/series/inside-tiktoks-highly-secretive-algorithm/investigation-how-tiktok-algorithm-figures-out-your-deepest-desires/6C0C2040-FF25-4827-8528-2BD6612E3796 (21 settembre 2024).
  49. Wolk A. (2015) Over the top. How the internet is (slowly but surely) changing the television industry. Createspace independent publishing platform.
  50. The Verge (2023), It’s Official, People aren’t Watching TV as much as they Used to,https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/15/23833516/nielsen-tv-cable-50-percent-decline-viewership-bum-bums (21 settembre 2024).
  51. The Verge (2024), TikTok Goes Full YouTube, https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/29/24054906/tiktok-youtube-horizontal-videos-creators (21 settembre 2024).
  52. We Are Social (2024), Digital 2024: 5 Billion Social Media Users https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/ (21 settembre 2024).
  53. Williams R. (1971), Television: Technology and Cultural Form, Routledge, London; trad. it. (2000) Televisione. Tecnologia e forma culturale, Editori Riuniti, Roma.
  54. Wired (2023), TikTok is the new TV https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-new-show-tv-takeover/?utm_source=pocket_saves&utm_medium=email (21 settembre 2024).
  55. Zulli D., Zulli D.J. (2020), Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform, in «New Media & Society», 24(8), 1872–1890. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820983603

Alberto Marinelli, Ellenrose Firth, Datacasting. L’esperienza del flusso algoritmico nell’ecosistema delle streaming platform e in TikTok in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 67/2024, pp 20-42, DOI: 10.3280/SC2024-067002