National strategies and international identity of EU, USA and China in the context of the fight against climate change

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Natalia Serbina, Andrii Bozhkov, Nataliia Bordun-Komar
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 21 P. 169-189 Dimensione file 153 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2025-001007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The purpose of the study is to establish the role of climate change threat in shaping national strategies and foreign policy relations of the actors in international relations. The methods of the study include document analysis of international agreements and national legislation, case studies, and comparative analysis in the context of differences in approaches to climate communication. The results of the study demonstrate that the rhetoric of European Union officials and aspects of European climate strategies position the EU as a leader in adapting to climate threats. Climate communications within the United States are more focused on informing the population about climate change, while foreign policy environmental institutions aim to fully protect the country’s national interests. Moreover, considering that the industrial sector of the People’s Republic of China is a leader in greenhouse gas emissions, a substantial threat lies in the potential deviation from commitments under the Paris Agreement. Conversely, the United States government has demonstrated some of the most progressive actions in mobilising resources within the framework of climate communications. An example of this is the executive order “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad” and the Inflation Reduction Act. Within the European Union, a similar practice is represented by the European Green Deal, which frequently appears in mass media and has a transparent reporting system, enhancing climate literacy and awareness among broad segments of the population. Thus, the climate communication and diplomacy of the European Union focus on raising awareness both within and beyond its borders, while the US government prioritises foreign policy interests within its climate strategies. In contrast, the rhetoric of the government of the People’s Republic of China highlights the challenges in achieving the targets set by the Paris Agreement within the timeframe leading up to 2030.

Parole chiave:global climate change, climate communications, foreign policy identity, foreign policy, European Green Deal, climate diplomacy.

Jel codes:Q54, Q58, O44

  1. Marketos, C. (2016). Here’s Why the U.S. and China Are Signing the Historic Paris Agreement on Earth Day. -- https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/03/31/heres-why-us-and-china-are-signing-historic-paris-agreement-earth-day.
  2. McGowan, A. (2024). Profiles in Sustainability: Anthony Leiserowitz, Director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 66(4), 47-52. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2024.2343278
  3. Medinilla, A. (2021). Briefing Note No. 133: AU-EU Cooperation on Climate and Energy: In Search of a Common Narrative. Belgium: Open Society European Policy Institute.
  4. Members of the International Universities Climate Alliance. (2024). -- https://universitiesforclimate.org/member.
  5. Oberthür, S., Dupont, C. (2021). The European Union’s International Climate Leadership: Towards a Grand Climate Strategy? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1095-1114. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218
  6. Office of Conservation and Water (2024). -- https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/under-secretary-for-economic-growth-energy-and-the-environment/bureau-of-oceans-and-international-environmental-and-scientific-affairs/office-of-conservation-and-water/.
  7. Paris Agreement (2015). -- https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
  8. Paul, P. J. (2021). Climate Change Disclosures Regain National Attention. Natural Resources & Environment, 36(1), 53-55.
  9. Peng, H. P. (2022). Absence of Media Literacy in Green Energy: A Preliminary Study of Innovative Pedagogy for Interdisciplinary Professional Training on Science News. Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 55-62.
  10. Pérez-Curiel, C., Garrote-Fuentes, Á. and Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2023). EU and Crisis Management: Afghanistan and Ukraine on Social Media. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 1-11.
  11. Radomska, M., Zeltina, M. (2024). Design thinking to avoid maladaptation in building climate change resilience of urban areas. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 15(2), 36-46.
  12. Resource Mobilization by Green Climate Fund (2024). -- https://www.greenclimate.fund/about/resource-mobilisation/irm.
  13. Shawoo, Z., Maltais, A., Bakhtaoui., I, Kartha, S. (2021). Designing a Fair and Feasible Loss and Damage Finance Mechanism. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
  14. Shepherd, Ch., Rauhala, E., Mooney, Ch. (2023). As the World Sizzles, China Says it will Deal with Climate its Own Way. The Washington Post. -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/19/climate-change-heat-wave-china/.
  15. Shevchenko, O. (2023). Evolution of international public opinion on global climate change. International Relations, Public Communications and Regional Studies, 1(15), 106-123. DOI: 10.29038/2524-2679-2023-01-106-123
  16. Shevchenko, O. (2024). Communication Component of the US’s Climate Policy. Actual Problems of International Relations, 1(159), 4-11.
  17. Fact Sheet: President Biden to Catalyze Global Climate Action through the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate (2023). -- https://static.poder360.com.br/2023/04/casa-branca-fundo-amazonia-20abr-2023.pdf.
  18. reduction-target-aimed-at-creating-good-paying-union-jobs-and-securing-u-s-leadership-on-clean-energy-technologies/.
  19. van Erp, J.B. (2009). Short Review of the COP-15 Conference in Copenhagen. -- https://las-ans.org.br/short-review-of-the-cop-15-conference-in-copenhagen/.
  20. Vega, N. (2024). Foreword. Climate Communications Whitepaper. -- https://www.climatecommunications.earth/whitepaper-articles/foreword.
  21. von Lucke, F. (2021). Principled Pragmatism in Climate Policy? The EU and Changing Practices of Climate Justice. Political Geography, 86, 102355.2021.102355.
  22. Wang, S., Wu, J., Xiang, M., Wang, S., Xie, X., Lv, L., Huang, G. (2024). Multi-Objective Optimisation Model of a Low-Cost Path to Peaking Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Carbon Neutrality in China. Science of the Total Environment, 912, 169386.
  23. What is Climate Diplomacy? (2020). -- https://climate-diplomacy.org/what-climate-diplomacy.
  24. With Charisma, Stick, and Carrot: Reviewing the Effectiveness of EU Climate Diplomacy (2023). -- https://pism.pl/publications/with-charisma-stick-and-carrot-reviewing-the-effectiveness-of-eu-climate-diplomacy.
  25. Yevseiev, S., Hryshchuk, R., Molodetska, K., Nazarkevych, M., Hrytsyk, V., Milov, O. et al. (2022). Modeling of security systems for critical infrastructure facilities. In: Modeling of Security Systems for Critical Infrastructure Facilities (pp. 1-181). Kharkiv: Technology Center. DOI: 10.15587/978-617-7319-57-2
  26. Zhang, W., Zhou, Y., Gong, Z., Kang, J., Zhao, C., Meng, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J. (2023). Quantifying Stranded Assets of the Coal-Fired Power in China under the Paris Agreement target. Climate Policy, 23(1), 11-24. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1953433
  27. Fedoniuk, T., Zhuravel, S., Kravchuk, M., Pazych, V., Bezvershuck, I. (2024). Historical sketch and current state of weed diversity in continental zone of Ukraine. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 58(5), 631-642.
  28. Halko, S., Suprun, O., Miroshnyk, O. (2021). Influence of temperature on energy performance indicators of hybrid solar panels using cylindrical cogeneration photovoltaic modules. In: 2021 IEEE 2nd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology, KhPI Week 2021 – Conference Proceedings (pp. 132-136). Kharkiv: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  29. Hassol, S. J. (2024). The Current State of Climate Communications. Climate Communications Whitepaper. -- https://www.climatecommunications.earth/whitepaper-articles/the-current-state-of-climate.
  30. Hussain, K., Khan, N. A., Vambol, V., Vambol, S., Yeremenko, S., Sydorenko, V. (2022). Advancement in Ozone base wastewater treatment technologies: Brief review. Ecological Questions, 33(2). DOI: 10.12775/EQ.2022.010
  31. In Europe, Green Policies Rule While Green Politicians Struggle (2023). -- https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/12/07/in-europe-green-policies-rule-while-green-politicians-struggle.
  32. Indonesia – Green Agenda (2019). -- https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/resources/team-europe-tracker/partner-countries/indonesia/indonesia-green-agenda_en.Inflation Reduction Act No. H.R.5376 (2022). -- https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376/text.
  33. Kalaganov, B., Madiyarova, A. S., Sartayeva, K. R., Kim, E. P., Apakhayev, N., Buribayev, Y. A. (2018). Legal fundamentals of the Kazakhstan’s environmental international cooperation: new vectors of legislative reforms. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(7), 1525-1538.
  34. Kougias, I., Taylor, N., Kakoulaki, G., Jäger-Waldau, A. (2021). The Role of Photovoltaics for the European Green Deal and the Recovery Plan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111017.
  35. Kovach, D., Kullolli, B., Djaparova, S., Mikhnevych, L., Myskovets, I. (2024). Legal aspects of environmental sustainability and climate change: the role of international and national legislation. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 4(2), 149-179.
  36. Krasivskyy, O. (2024). Development and evolution of European Union policy. Democratic Governance, 17(2), 46-57.
  37. Larch, M., Wanner, J. (2024). The Consequences of Non-Participation in the Paris Agreement. European Economic Review, 163, 104699.
  38. Lazard, O., Youngs, R. (2021). The EU and Climate Security: Toward Ecological Diplomacy. Washinghton: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  39. Leiserowitz, A., Carman, J., Buttermore, N., Neyens, L., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J., Schneider, J. W., Mulcahy, K. (2022). International Public Opinion on Climate Change 2022. New Haven: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and Data for Good at Meta.
  40. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Carman, J., Marlon, J., Kotcher, J., Rosenthal, S., Low, J. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (2024). YPCCC’s Resources on Climate in the 2024 U.S. General Election. Policy & Politics. -- https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/ypccc-2024-election-resources/.
  41. Leys, D., Anderson, R. (2022). The Green Climate Fund: A Unique Financing Vehicle Among International Organizations. In: C. Smith, X. Gao and T. Dollmaier (Eds.). Funding International Development Organizations. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.
  42. Loss and Damage Fund for Developing Countries (2024). -- https://www.undp.org/belarus/stories/loss-and-damage-fund-developing-countries.
  43. Simonet, L. (2023). NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept: Analysis and Implications for Austria. Vienna: Austrian Institute for International Politics.
  44. Skliar, I., Skliar, V., Sherstiuk, M., Zubtsova, I. (2023). Dimensional characteristics of nymphoides peltata (S.G. Gmel.) Kuntze in different ecological and cenotic conditions of the basin’s water bodies Desna River (Ukraine). International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 23(3.2), 103-110.
  45. Skliar, V., Smoliar, N., Kozak, M., Liubynskyi, O., Skliar, Y. (2024). Ecological and cenotic features of natural regeneration of forests in the Left-Bank Polissya of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 15(2), 118-134.
  46. Suarez-Cuesta, D., Latorre, M., van Heerden, J. (2024). Dynamic Effects of the Inflation Reduction Act: A CGE Analysis. Conference on Global Economic Analysis, 27, 1-26.
  47. Sweeney, S., Winn, N. (2022). Understanding the Ambition in the EU’s Strategic Compass: A Case for Optimism at Last? Defence Studies, 22(2), 192-210. DOI: 14702436.2022.2036608.
  48. Sydykova, G., Umbetova, S., Baimakhanova, Z., Abieva, G., Kurmanbayev, G. (2023). Modern Applications of Ozone Technology. Evergreen, 10(4), 2308-2316. DOI: 10.5109/7160908
  49. Syrov, O. (2024). Administrative legal regulation of the agro-industrial complex in the context of the “green” transition. Law. Human. Environment, 15(4), 84-102.
  50. Talenti, R. (2020). EU’s Fight Against Climate Change: An Example of Leading by Example? Perspective on Federalism, 12(2), 2-13.
  51. The Best Universities Solving Climate Change (2024). -- https://successfulstudent.org/the-best-universities-solving-climate-change/#ranking-top-table.
  52. The Kyoto Protocol (2023). -- https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol/the-doha-amendment.
  53. Thomas, A. (2024). Research Needs for Loss and Damage. Science, 383(6685), 798-798.
  54. Tikhomirova, E. (2023). Climate disinformation: interpretation and related concepts. International Relations, Public Communications and Regional Studies, 3(17), 244-260. DOI: 10.29038/2524-2679-2023-03-244-26
  55. Tiwari, A. (2022). Climate Diplomacy to Attain Global Eco-Neutrality. Advanced Materials Letters, 13(3), 2203-1697.
  56. Tomassi, A., Caforio, A., Romano, E., Lamponi, E., Pollini, A. (2024). The Development of a Competence Framework for Environmental Education Complying with the European Qualifications Framework and the European Green Deal. The Journal of Environmental Education, 55(2), 153-179. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2023.2259846
  57. Tryhuba, A., Hutsol, T., Kubon, M., Tryhuba, I., Komarnitskyi, S., Tabor, S., Kwasniewski, D., Mudryk, K., Faichuk, O., Hohol, T., Tomaszewska-Górecka, W. (2022). Taxonomy and Stakeholder Risk Management in Integrated Projects of the European Green Deal. Energies, 15(6), 2015.
  58. U.S. China Climate Forum (2024). Past Events. -- https://www.uschinaclimateforum.org/our-work.
  59. Ukraine and European Green Deal: Annual Monitoring Report 2023 (2024). -- https://rac.org.ua/en/eu-accession/european-green-deal/uknaine-and-european-green-deal-annual-monitoring-report-2023/.
  60. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (with Annexes) (1992). -- https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/recenttexts/unfccc_eng.pdf.
  61. Uri, I., Robinson, S.A., Roberts, J.T., Ciplet, D., Weikmans, R., Khan, M. (2024). Equity and Justice in Loss and Damage Finance: A Narrative Review of Catalysts and Obstacles. Current Climate Change Reports, 10(3), 33-45.
  62. Fact Sheet: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies (2021). -- https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2030-greenhouse-gas-pollution-
  63. Executive Order No. 14008 “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad” (2021). -- https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0202-0012.
  64. European Green Deal (2024). -- https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
  65. EU Adaptation Strategy (2021). -- https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/adaptation-climate-change/eu-adaptation-strategy_en.
  66. Dyomin, M., Dmytrenko, A., Chernyshev, D., Ivashko, O. (2020). Big Cities Industrial Territories Revitalization Problems and Ways of Their Solution. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 73, 365-373. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42939-3_37
  67. Delivering the European Green Deal (2023). -- https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/delivering-european-green-deal_en.
  68. Cugnata, G., Cuel, J., Bertuzzi, N., Parks, L., Zamponi, L. (2024). Convergence in Action: Framing the Climate Crisis at the 2021 Pre-COP Counter-Summit in Milan. European Societies, 26(5), 1545-1571. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2024.2362151
  69. Craig, R. K. (2022). Climate Adaptation Law and Policy in the United States. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1-6.
  70. Council Conclusions on Climate Diplomacy (2018). -- https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6125-2018-INIT/en/pdf.
  71. COP28 World Climate Action Summit, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 1-2 December 2023. (2023). -- https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-summit/2023/12/01-02/.Council Conclusions on Climate and Energy Diplomacy (2023). -- https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/62942/st07248-en23.pdf.
  72. CO2 Emissions by Country (2024). -- https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country/.Communications by Climate Program Office (2024). -- https://cpo.noaa.gov/divisions-programs/communication-education-and-engagement/communication/.
  73. Climate Program Office (2024). Strategic Plan 2024-2028. -- https://sab.noaa.gov/wp-content/uploads/CPOStrategicPlan.pdf.
  74. Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (2024). -- https://energyandcleanair.org/.
  75. Burns, C., Eckersley, P., Tobin, P. (2019). EU Environmental Policy in Times of Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1561741
  76. Badullovich, N., Grant, W. J., Colvin, R. M. (2020). Framing Climate Change for Effective Communication: A Systematic Map. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 123002.
  77. A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. For a European Union that Protects its Citizens, Values and Interests and Contributes to International Peace and Security (2022). -- https://www.satcen.europa.eu/keydocuments/strategic_compass_en3_web6298d4e4601f2a0001c0f871.pdf.
  78. Shuka, L., Çullaj, A., Shumka, S., Miho, A., Duka, S., Bachofen, R. (2011). The Spatial and Temporal Variability of Limnological Properties of Bovilla Reservoir (Albania). Water Resources Management, 25(12), 3027-3039.
  79. Shumka, S., Kalogianni, E., Šanda, R., Vukic, J., Shumka, L., Zimmerman, B. (2020). Ecological particularities of the critically endangered killifish Valencia letourneuxi and its spring-fed habitats: A long-lost endemic species of south Albania. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 2020(421), 45.

Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Natalia Serbina, Andrii Bozhkov, Nataliia Bordun-Komar, National strategies and international identity of EU, USA and China in the context of the fight against climate change in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2025, pp 169-189, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2025-001007