Quantifying the Redistributive Effect of the Erosion of the Italian Personal Income Tax Base: A Microsimulation Exercise

Journal title ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Author/s Stefano Boscolo
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/2
Language English Pages 42 P. 39-80 File size 374 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2019-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In recent years several sources of income have been excluded from the Italian Personal Income Tax (PIT) base and subject to alternative proportional systems or totally exempt from taxation. These changes have contributed to making PIT even more selective, accentuating vertical equity issues that have accompanied it since it was introduced in 1974. The aim of this paper is to calculate the redistributive effect following the erosion of the PIT base and the contribution of this phenomenon in determing the redistributive power of the Italian tax system, as well as the distribution of the fiscal benefits and burdens by deciles of income under the alternative tax rules considered. Using a static microsimulation model, the paper compares various versions of the tax system within a counterfactual logic: on the one hand, the existing legislation as of 2014 consisting of PIT and those incomes subject to substitute taxes or tax-free in this study; on the other hand, an hypothetical legislation which takes as a reference point the Comprehensive Income Tax (CIT) scheme and includes in its base all incomes replicated. The results demonstrate that the erosion of the PIT base has reduced the redistributive effect and the progressive nature of the Italian tax system.

Keywords: Microsimulation, personal income tax, comprehensive income tax, redistributive effect, progressivity, decomposition

Jel codes: D3, H2

  1. Agenzia delle Entrate (2012). Circolare n. 17/E del 30 maggio 2012. Oggetto: Regime fiscale di vantaggio per l’imprenditoria giovanile e lavoratori in mobilità di cui all’articolo 27, commi 1 e 2, del D.L. 6 luglio 2011, n. 98 – primi chiarimenti.
  2. Agenzia delle Entrate (2016a). Circolare n. 10/E del 4 aprile 2016. Oggetto: Regime forfetario – legge 23 dicembre 2014, n. 190, articolo 1, commi da 54 a 89, Stabilità 2015.
  3. Agenzia delle Entrate (2017). Gli immobili in Italia – 2017. Ricchezza, redditto e fiscalità immobiliare. Rome.
  4. Agenzia delle Entrate (2018). Circolare n. 5/E. Premi di risultato e welfare aziendale – art. 1, commi 182 a 190, legge 28 dicembre 2015, n. 208 (legge di Stabilità 2016), così come modificato dall’art.1, commi 160 - 162, legge 11 dicembre 2016, n. 232 (legge di Bilancio 2017), dall’art. 55 decreto legge 24 aprile 2017, n. 50, convertito con modificazioni dalla legge 21 giugno 2017, n. 96 e dall’art. 1, commi 28 e 161, legge 27 dicembre 2017, n. 205 (legge di Bilancio 2018).
  5. Albarea A., Bernasconi M., Di Novi C., Marenzi A., Rizzi D. and Zantomio F. (2015). Accounting for tax evasion profiles and tax expenditures in microsimulation modelling. The BETAMOD model for personal income taxes in Italy. International Journal of Microsimulation, 8(3): 99-136.
  6. Allison P. (2015). Imputation by Predictive Mean Matching: Promise & Peril. --statisticalhorizons.com, 05.03.2015.
  7. Atkinson A.B. (1970). On the Measurement of Inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244-263.
  8. Atkinson A.B. (2015). Inequality. What Can Be Done? Oxford University Press.
  9. Avram S. (2017). Who benefits from the ‘hidden welfare state’? The distributional effects of personal income tax expenditure in six countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(1): 1-23.
  10. Azzolini D., Bazzoli M., De Poli S., Fiorio C. and Poy S. (2017). Developing and Validating Regional Microsimulation Models. TREMOD: The Tax-Benefit Model of the Italian Province of Trento. Economia pubblica, 1: 5-33.
  11. Baldini M. (2000). Mapp98: un modello di analisi delle politiche pubbliche. DEP Materiali di discussione n. 331.
  12. Baldini M. and Toso S. (2009). Diseguaglianza, povertà e politiche pubbliche. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Baldini M., Ciani E. and Pacifico D. (2011). Mapp, a tax benefit microsimulation Model for the Analysis of Public Policies in Italy. University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Economics.
  14. Baldini M., Giarda E. and Olivieri A. (2015a). A Tax-Benefit Microsimulation Model for Italy: A Partial Evaluation of Fiscal Consolidation in the Period 2011-2014. Prometeia Nota di Lavoro, 1.
  15. Baldini M., Giarda E., Olivieri A., Pellegrino S. and Zanardi A. (2015b). Il “bonus” degli 80 euro: caratteristiche ed effetti redistributivi. Rivista di diritto finanziario e scienza delle finanze, LXXIV(I): 3-22.
  16. Barbetta G.P., Pellegrino S. and Turati G. (2018). What Explains the Redistribution Achieved by the Italian Personal Income Tax? Evidence from Administrative Data. Public Finance Review, 46(1): 7-28.
  17. Banca d’Italia (2015). Supplementi al Bollettino Statistico. La ricchezza delle famiglie italiane: anno 2014. Nuova serie, XXV(69), 16 dicembre.
  18. Bises B. and Scialà A. (2014). The Erosion of the Personal Income Tax Base in Italy: Equity Aspects. Economia pubblica, 3: 145-166.
  19. Brandolini M., Giarda E., Moriconi M. and Loi M. (2009). Possibili effetti dell’under-reporting sull’analisi della ricchezza finanziaria basata sull’indagine dei bilanci delle famiglie di Banca d’Italia. Rapporto di Previsione, Prometeia, July, Ch. 8, 123-131.
  20. Brandolini M., Coroneo F. and Moriconi M. (2014). La correzione del possesso e dell’ammontare delle attività finanziarie detenute dalle famiglie dell’Indagine sui Bilanci Familiari di Banca d’Italia. Prometeia, Bologna, mimeo.
  21. Ceriani L., Fiorio C.V. and Gigliarano C. (2013). The importance of choosing the data set for tax-benefit analysis. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6(1): 86-121.
  22. Creedy J. and Tuckwell I. (2004). Reweighting Household Surveys for Tax Microsimulation Modelling: An Application to the New Zealand Household Economic Survey. Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), 7(1): 71-88.
  23. Creedy J. (2010). The Personal Income Tax Structure: Theory and Policy. In: Claus I., Gemmell N., Harding M. and White D. (Eds.). Tax Reform in Open Economies: International and Country Perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  24. D’Aurizio L., Faiella I., Iezzi S. and Neri A. (2006). L’under-reporting della ricchezza finanziaria nell’indagine sui bilanci delle famiglie. Banca d’Italia, TD No. 610 (dicembre).
  25. Di Caro P. (2018). Redistribution in real-world PIT: Evidence from Italian tax records. Department of Finance Working Paper No. 2.
  26. Di Zio M. & Guarnera U. (2009). Semiparametric predictive mean matching. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 93(2): 175-186.
  27. Di Nicola F., Mongelli G. and Pellegrino S. (2015). The static microsimulation model of the Italian Department of Finance: Structure and first results regarding income and housing taxation. Economia pubblica, 2: 125-157.
  28. Duclos J.Y. (1993). Progressivity, redistribution, and equity, with application to the British tax and benefit system. Public Finance, 48(3): 350-365.
  29. European Economy (2014). Tax expenditures in direct taxation in EU Member States. Occasional Papers, n. 207, December.
  30. Fiorio C. and D’Amuri F. (2006). Tax Evasion in Italy: An Analysis Using a Tax-benefit Microsimulation Model. The IUP Journal of Public Finance, 4(2): 19-37.
  31. ISTAT (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica) (2011). La metodologia di stima dei redditi lordi nell’indagine Eu-Silc. Metodi e Norme, 49.
  32. Kristjánsson A.S. (2013). Redistributive effects in a Dual Income Tax System. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 69(2): 148-166.
  33. Kaplan D.M. (2018). distcomp: Comparing distirbutions. The Stata Journal, 10(2): 1-13.
  34. Liberati P. and Scialà A. (2015). L’ingiusta progressività dell’Irpef. -- lavoce.info, 16.01.2015.
  35. Lungarella R. (2018). La cedolare secca entra nei negozi. -- lavoce.info, 21.12.18.
  36. Maitino L.M., Ravagli L. and Sciclone N. (2017). MicroReg: a Traditional Tax-Benefit Microsimulation Model Extended to Indirect Taxes and In-Kind Transfers. International Journal of Microsimulation, 10(1): 5-38.
  37. Majcen B., Verbic M. and Cok M. (2007). The Income Tax Reform in Slovenia: Should the Flat Tax Have Prevailed? MPRA Paper 10348, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  38. Mallone G. (2015). Il welfare aziendale in Italia: tempo di una riflessione organica. In: Maino F. and Ferrera M. (Eds.). Primo rapporto sul secondo welfare in Italia.
  39. MEF (Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze) (2014). Il quadro di classificazione delle entrate – Anno 2014. Dipartimento della Ragioneria generale dello Stato.
  40. MEF (Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze) (2017). Rapporto annuale sulle spese fiscali 2017. Commissione per le spese fiscali, Rome.
  41. O’Donoghue C. (2014). Handbook of Microsimulation Modelling. Bingley: Emerald.
  42. Onrubia J., Picos-Sánchez F. and del Carmen Rodado M. (2014). Rethinking the Pfähler-Lambert decomposition analyse real world personal income taxes. International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4): 796-812.
  43. Pacifico D. (2014). sreweight: A Stata command to reweight survey data to external totals. The Stata Journal, 14(1): 4-21.
  44. Pechman J.A. (1977). Comprehensive Income Taxation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  45. Pellegrino S., Piacenza M. and Turati G. (2011). Developing a static microsimulation model for the analysis of housing taxation in Italy. International Journal of Microsimulation, 4(2): 73-85.
  46. Randjelovic S. (2016). Estimating the impact of income tax on personal savings in Serbia: The two channels approach. Acta Oeconomica, 66(2): 261-281.
  47. Randjelović S. and Žarković-Rakić J. (2011). Addressing Inequality and Poverty with Tax Instruments. Economic Annals, 56(190): 7-26.
  48. Reynolds M. and Smolensky, E. (1977). Public Expenditures, Taxes, and the Distribution of Income: The United States, 1950, 1961, 1970. New York: Academic Press.
  49. SSEF-MEF (Scuola Superiore dell’Economia e delle Finanze “Ezio Vanoni” – Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze) (2008). Libro Bianco – L’imposta sui redditi delle persone fisiche e il sostegno alle famiglie. Tributi, Supplemento n. 1.
  50. Stevanato D. (2016). Dalla crisi dell’Irpef alla flat tax: prospettive per una riforma dell’imposta sul reddito. Bologna: il Mulino.

  • The Italian Treasury Dynamic Microsimulation Model (T-DYMM): Data, Structure and Baseline Results Riccardo Conti, Michele Bavaro, Stefano Boscolo, Elena Fabrizi, Chiara Puccioni, Ottavio Ricchi, Simone Tedeschi, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2023
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4546893
  • Simulating Long-Run Wealth Distribution and Transmission: The Role of Intergenerational Transfers Michele Bavaro, Stefano Boscolo, Simone Tedeschi, in Italian Economic Journal /2025
    DOI: 10.1007/s40797-024-00304-3
  • The Struggle of Being Poor and Claimant: Evidence on the Non-Take-Up of Social Policies in Italy Stefano Boscolo, Giovanni Gallo, in Italian Economic Journal /2024 pp.625
    DOI: 10.1007/s40797-023-00230-w
  • Regional Support for the National Government: Joint Effects of Minimum Income Schemes in Italy Giovanni Gallo, in Italian Economic Journal /2021 pp.149
    DOI: 10.1007/s40797-019-00118-8
  • The contribution of tax-benefit instruments to income redistribution in Italy Stefano Boscolo, in ECONOMIA PUBBLICA 2/2022 pp.181
    DOI: 10.3280/EP2022-002001

Stefano Boscolo, Quantifying the Redistributive Effect of the Erosion of the Italian Personal Income Tax Base: A Microsimulation Exercise in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 2/2019, pp 39-80, DOI: 10.3280/EP2019-002003