Fare ricerca con i bambini in ospedale: limiti, sfide e soluzioni creative

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Giulia Storato, Giulia Maria Cavaletto, Roberta Bosisio
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 11 P. 29-39 Dimensione file 390 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2023-002004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The article describes the methodology adopted in a specific action part of a PRIN research on children's participation and identity construction in health and education contexts. The action aimed to investigate children's agency recognition and promotion in School in Hospi- tal Service, within some Italian children's hospitals. Practicing research with hospitalized children has implied the respect of rules, priorities and limits which, exacerbated by the pandemic, conditioned the research agenda, posing challenges on which techniques could be adopted. Combining creativity and reflexivity, we proposed to the children-students-patients a multi-method research path, based on visual, creative and participatory activities, whose development led to outline an innovative methodology which can inspire further research in the fields of the sociology of health and childhood.

Parole chiave:bambini ospedalizzati; metodi creativi; tecniche partecipative; approccio a mosaico; pandemia; scuola in ospedale.

  1. Bates C. (2013). Video Diaries: Audio-Visual Research Methods and The Elusive Body. Visual Studies, 28(1): 29-37. DOI: 10.1080/1472586X.2013.76520
  2. Boles J., Daniels S. (2019). Researching the Experiences of Children with Cancer: Considerations for Practice. Children, 6(93).
  3. Bosisio R., Ronfani P. (2020). Children as Rights Holders. Current Debate and Chal- lenges. Revue de Science Sociales, 63: 28-35. DOI: 10.4000/revss.4767
  4. Brady G., Lowe P., Olin Lauritzen S. (2015). Connecting a sociology of childhood perspective with the study of child health, illness and wellbeing: introduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(2): 173-183.
  5. Catenazzo T., a cura di (2019). La scuola in ospedale e l’istruzione domiciliare. Formazione degli insegnanti e linee di indirizzo nazionali. Roma: Carocci
  6. Clark A. (2011). Multimodal map making with young children: exploring ethno- graphic and participatory methods. Qualitative research, 11(3): 311-330. DOI: 10.1177/146879411140053
  7. Clark A. (2010). Young children as Protagonists and the Role of Participatory, Visual Methods in Engaging Multiple Perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2): 115-123.
  8. Clark A., Moss P. (2001). Listening to young children: the mosaic approach. Lon-don: National Children’s Bureau.
  9. Corsaro W. (1992). Interpretative reproduction in children's peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2): 160-177. DOI: 10.2307/278694
  10. Coyne I., Hayes E., Gallagher P. (2009). Research with hospitalized children. Ethi- cal, methodological and organizational challenges. Childhood, 16(3): 413-429. DOI: 10.1177/090756820933531
  11. Danby S., Wing L., Thorpe K., (2011). The Novice Researcher: Interviewing Young Chil- dren. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(1): 74-84. DOI: 10.1177/107780041038975
  12. Della Puppa F., Matteuzzi F., Saresin F. (2021). La linea dell'orizzonte. Un ethno- graphic novel sulla migrazione tra Bangladesh, Italia e Londra. Padova: Becco Giallo Editore.
  13. Einberg E. L., Nygren J. M., Sveberg P., Enskär K. (2015). ‘Through my eyes’: health-promoting factors described by photographs taken by children with ex- perience of cancer treatment. Child: care, health and development, 42(1): 76–86.
  14. Giorgi A., Pizzolati M., Vacchelli E. (2021). Metodi creativi per la ricerca sociale. Contesto, pratiche e strumenti. Bologna: Il Mulino
  15. Gibson F., Aldiss S., Hostman M., Kumpunen S., Richardson A. (2010). Children and young people’s experiences of cancer care: A qualitative research study us- ing participatory methods. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47: 1397– 1407.
  16. Hardy P., Sumner T. (2014). Cultivating compassion: How Digital Storytelling is Transforming Healthcare. Kingsham: Chichester.
  17. Hurdley R. (2006). Dismantling Mantelpieces: Narrating Identities and Materializing Cul- ture in the Home. Sociology, 40(4): 717-733. DOI: 10.1177/003803850606515
  18. James A., Jenks C., Prout A. (1998). Theorizing Childhood. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  19. Lapum J., Liu L., Church K., Yau M. T., Ruttonsha P., David A. M., Retta B. (2014). Arts-Informed Research Dissemination in the Health Sciences: An Evaluation of Peoples’ Responses to “The 7,024th Patient” Art Installation. Sage Open, 4(1). DOI: 10.1177/215824401452421
  20. Lambert J., Hessler B. (2018). Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community (5th Edition). London: Routledge.
  21. Lincoln S. (2014). “I've Stamped My Personality All Over It”: The Meaning of Objects in Teenage Bedroom Space. Space and Culture, 17(3): 266-279. DOI: 10.1177/120633121245167
  22. Luttrell W. (2010). A camera is a big responsibility: a lens for analysing children’s vis-ual voice. Visual Studies, 25(3): 224-237. DOI: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.52327
  23. Moretti V., Scavarda A. (2021). Graphic Medicine. Una disciplina in cerca di auto- re. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3: 733-754. DOI: 10.1423/102890
  24. McIntosh C., Stephens C. (2012). A storybook method for exploring young chil- dren's views of illness causality in relation to the familial context. Early Child Development and Care, 182(1): 23-33. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2010.53416
  25. Morrow V., Richards M. (1996). The ethics of Social Research with Children. An over- view. Children & Society, 10(2): 90-105.
  26. Pahl K., (2012). Every Object Tells a Story. Intergenerational Stories and Objects in the Homes of Pakistani Heritage Families in South Yorkshire. Home Cul- tures, 9(3): 303-328. DOI: 10.2752/175174212X1341498352215
  27. Punch S. (2002). Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?. Childhood, 9(3): 321-341. DOI: 10.1177/090756820200900300
  28. Rowsell J. (2011). Carrying my family with me: artifacts as emic perspectives. Qualitative Research, 11(3): 331-346. DOI: 10.1177/14687941113998
  29. Robinson Y. K., Gillies V. (2012). Introduction: developing creative methods with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Method- ology, 15: 87 - 89. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2012.64941
  30. Simmonds S., Roux C., Avest I. (2015). Blurring the Boundaries Between Pho- tovoice and Narrative Inquiry: A Narrative-Photovoice Methodology for Gen- der-Based Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,14(3): 33-49. DOI: 10.1177/16094069150140030
  31. Thomas N., O’Kane C. (1997). The Ethics of Participatory Research with Children. Children & Society, 12(5): 336-348.
  32. Wang C, Burris MA. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Par- ticipatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3): 369-387. DOI: 10.1177/10901981970240030

Giulia Storato, Giulia Maria Cavaletto, Roberta Bosisio, Fare ricerca con i bambini in ospedale: limiti, sfide e soluzioni creative in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2023, pp 29-39, DOI: 10.3280/SES2023-002004