Fare o rifiutare un aborto. Sociologia dell’obiezione di coscienza

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Valeria Quaglia, Rossella Ghigi
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 17 P. 147-163 Dimensione file 455 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2023-003011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

What are the reasons behind the decision of doctors and health providers to be conscientious objectors to abortion? The public debate and general belief in this regard often take it for grant-ed that this choice derives from ethical or religious reasons. Starting from an updated review of the sociological literature on such topic, with a specific focus on data deriving from field research, the article explores the heterogeneity of factors that can lead a health professional to refuse to perform abortion procedures. We take into account the findings of empirical studies about personal (ethical or religious), organizational (career and context), and social motivations (avoidance of stigma and fear of marginalization). In conclusion, we offer policy indications aimed, on the one hand, at protecting the right of health professionals to operate according to their beliefs, and on the other hand at maintaining and guaranteeing women’s access to abor-tion services.

Parole chiave:obiezione di coscienza; aborto; diritti riproduttivi; gravidanza indesiderata; stigma; professionisti della salute.

  1. Aiyer A.N., Steinman A., Ho G.Y. (1999). Influence of physician attitudes on willingness to perform abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 93(4): 576-80.
  2. Ashforth B.E., Kreiner G.E. (1999). “How Can You Do It?”: Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3): 413-434. DOI: 10.2307/25913
  3. Autorino T., Mattioli F., Mencarini L. (2018). Aborto e obiezione di coscienza in Italia. In viaggio per poter abortire. In: Ghigi R., a cura di, I suoi primi quarant’anni. L’aborto ai tempi della 194. Firenze: Neodemos.
  4. Autorino T., Mattioli F., Mencarini L. (2020). The impact of gynecologists’ conscientious objection on abortion access. Social Science Research, 87:102403.
  5. Bo M., Zotti C.M., Charrier L. (2015). Conscientious objection and waiting time for voluntary abortion in Italy. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 20(4): 272-82. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2014.99008
  6. Chavkin W., Leitman L., Poli K., Global Doctors for Choice (2013). Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: A White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123: 41-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60002-
  7. Chavkin W., Swerdlow L., Fifield J. (2017). Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: an international comparative multiplecase study. Health Human Rights, 19(1): 55-68.
  8. de la Fuente Fonnest I., Søndergaard F., Fonnest G., Vedsted-Jacobsen A. (2000). Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 79(1): 49-53.
  9. De Zordo S. (2016). Good doctors do not object. Obstetricians-gynaecolosists’ perspective on conscientious objection to abortion care and their engagement with pro-abortion rights protests in Italy. In: De Zordo S., Mishtal J., Anton L., eds., A fragmented landscape: Abortion governance and protest logics in Europe. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  10. De Zordo S., Mishtal J. (2011). Physicians and abortion: Provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground. The cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Health Issues, 2: 32-6.
  11. De Zordo S., Mishtal J., Anton L., eds. (2016). A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York-Oxford: Berghahn.
  12. Faúndes A., Alves Duarte G., Neto J.A., de Sousa M.H. (2004). The closer you are, the better you understand: the reaction of Brazilian obstetrician-gynaecologists to unwanted pregnancy. Reproductive Health Matters, 12: 47-56.
  13. Ferrero L., Pulice E. (2021). Pluralismo etico e conflitti di coscienza nell’attività ospedaliera: I. Scelte riproduttive e dibattiti sulla genitorialità. Bologna: il Mulino.
  14. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health (2006). Ethical Guidelines on Conscientious Objection. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 92(3): 333-4.
  15. Fink L.R., Stanhope K.K., Rochat R.W., Bernal O.A. (2016). “The fetus is my patient, too”: attitudes toward abortion and referral among physician conscientious objectors in Bogotá, Colombia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(2): 71-80.
  16. Fleming V., Frith L., Luyben A., Ramsayer B. (2018). Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1): 1-13.
  17. Freedman L. (2010). Willing and unable: doctors’ constraints in abortion care. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  18. Goffman E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  19. Hagen G.H., Hage C.O., Magelssen M., Nortvedt P. (2011). Attitudes of medical students towards abortion. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 131(18): 1768-71.
  20. Hammarstedt M., Jacobsson L., Wulff M., Lalos A. (2005). Views of midwives and gynecologists on legal abortion – a population-based study. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(1): 58-64.
  21. Harris L.F., Halpern J., Prata N., Chavkin W., Gerdts C. (2018). Conscientious objection to abortion provision: why context matters. Global public health, 13(5): 556-566. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2016.122935
  22. Harris L.H., Debbink M., Martin L., Hassinger J. (2011). Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop. Social Science & Medicine, 73(7): 1062-1070.
  23. Heino A., Gissler M., Apter D., Fiala C. (2013). Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 18(4): 231-233. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2013.81984
  24. Hughes E.C. (1951). Studying the nurse’s work. The American Journal of Nursing, 51(5): 294-295. DOI: 10.2307/345939
  25. Istat (2022). Aspetti della vita quotidiana. Roma: Istat. Testo disponibile al sito: http://dati.istat.it/ (23/09/2023).
  26. Joffe C. (2010). Dispatches from the abortion wars: The costs of fanaticism to doctors, patients, and the rest of us. Boston (MA): Beacon Press.
  27. Keogh L.A., Gillam L., Bismark M., McNamee K., Webster A., Bayly C., Newton D. (2019). Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1): 1-10.
  28. Kuhar R., Paternotte D., eds. (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  29. Kumar A., Hessini L., Mitchell E.M. (2009). Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(6): 625-639. DOI: 10.1080/1369105090284274
  30. Mancini S., Stoeckl K., (2018). Transatlantic Conversations: The Emergence of Society-Protective Antiabortion Arguments in the United States, Europe, and Russia. In: Mancini S., Rosenfeld M., eds., The Conscience Wars. Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Marchin A., Seale R., Sheeder J., Teal S., Guiahi M. (2020). Integration of catholic values and professional obligations in the provision of family planning services: a qualitative study. JAMA Network Open, 3(10): 2020297.
  32. Ministero della Salute (2021). Relazione Del Ministro Della Salute Sulla Attuazione Della Legge Contenente Norme Per La Tutela Sociale Della Maternità E Per L’interruzione Volontaria Di Gravidanza (LEGGE 194/78). Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/documentazione/p6_2_2_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=3103 (20/04/2022).
  33. Momigliano A. (2016). L’obiezione è davvero una questione di coscienza? RivistaStudio. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.rivistastudio.com/aborto-medici-obiettori-di-coscienza/ (31/03/2022).
  34. Morrell K.M., Chavkin W. (2015). Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 27(5): 333-338. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.000000000000019
  35. Morrell K.M., Chavkin W. (2015). Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 27(5): 333-8. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.000000000000019
  36. O’Donnell J., Weitz T.A., Freedman L.R. (2011). Resistance and vulnerability to stigmatization in abortion work. Social Science & Medicine, 73(9): 1357-64.
  37. Paris D. (2021). Reckoning with Growing Pluralism. Potentials and Limits of Conscientious Objection: Conscience Clauses in Abortion Laws in Europe. In: Busatta L., Casonato C., eds., Axiological Pluralism. Cham: Springer.
  38. Segato M., Pasqualetto A. (2017). L’ho fatto per le donne. Confessioni di un ginecologo non obiettore. Milano: Mondadori.
  39. Spina E. (2019). Professionalismo medico e obiezione di coscienza nell’IVG. Alcune ipotesi di ricerca. Salute e Società, 1: 117-133. DOI: 10.3280/SES2019-00100
  40. WHO (2012). Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70914/1/9789241548434_eng.pdf. (20/04/2022).
  41. WHO (2022). Abortion care guideline. Testo disponibile al sito: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/349316/9789240039483-eng.pdf (19/04/2022).
  42. Zampas C. (2013). Legal and ethical standards for protecting women’s human rights and the practice of conscientious objection in reproductive healthcare settings. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123: 63-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60005-

Valeria Quaglia, Rossella Ghigi, Fare o rifiutare un aborto. Sociologia dell’obiezione di coscienza in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2023, pp 147-163, DOI: 10.3280/SES2023-003011