Are we human? Some examples for mapping non-linear educational practices

Titolo Rivista EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Autori/Curatori Martina Capaccioli
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 258-273 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/erp1-2024oa18452
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The aim of this paper is to explore some open conditions and trajectories for thinking about models of learning facilitation in the light of non-linear understandings, typical of the posthuman thought. The posthuman framework allows for the thematization of a plurality of methods of educational intervention that decentralize that humanist logic that operates through oppositional and hierarchical models, shifting attention toward “practical provocations” that highlight the vitality of the material and the non-human. Grounding this proposal in the expert work of those scholars who are offering systematizations of this field of study, the article brings together examples of some empirical experiences to illustrate certain applications of feminist new material, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches to education.

The aim of this paper is to explore some open conditions and trajectories for thinking about models of learning facilitation in the light of non-linear understandings, typical of the posthuman thought. The posthuman framework allows for the thematization of a plurality of methods of educational intervention that decentralize that humanist logic that operates through oppositional and hierarchical models, shifting attention toward “practical provocations” that highlight the vitality of the material and the non-human. Grounding this proposal in the expert work of those scholars who are offering systematizations of this field of study, the article brings together examples of some empirical experiences to illustrate certain applications of feminist new material, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches to education.

Parole chiave:; Critical Posthumanism; Relational Materialisms; Posthuman Education; Educational Practices; Assemblages

  1. Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 28(3), pp. 801-831.
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham and London, UK: Duke University Press.
  4. Bracci, F. (2024). Posthuman epistemology of transformative practice. In V. Boffo, G. Del Gobbo, P. Malavasi (eds.), Giving the word: pedagogical, educational and training professionalism. A 100 anni dalla nascita di don Milani. Junior Conference, Lecce, Pensa MultiMedia, pp. 544-550.
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013a). Posthuman humanities. European Education Research Journal, 12(1), pp. 1-19.
  6. Braidotti, R. (2013b). The posthuman. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Translated in Italian, Il posthuman. Vol. 1. La vita oltre l'individuo, oltre la specie, oltre la morte. Roma: DeriveApprodi, 2014.
  7. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In D. Banerji and M.K. Paranjape (eds.). Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. Springer, pp. 13-32.
  8. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Translated in Italian, Il posthumano. Vol. 2. Saperi e soggettività. Rome: DeriveApprodi, 2022.
  9. Calderwood, S.J. (2023). An exploration of human and platform intra-actions in a digital teaching and learning environment. Learning, Media and Technology, 1, pp. 1-13.
  10. Cole, D.R. & Somerville, M. (2022). The affect(s) of literacy learning in the mud. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(2), pp. 188-204.
  11. Cozza, M. & Gherardi, S. (eds.) (2023). The Posthumanist Epistemology of Practice Theory. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les editions de Minuit. Transl. it., Mille planes. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Naples and Salerno: Orthotes, 2017.
  13. Fabbri, L. (2007). Communities of practices and reflective learning. Per una formazione situate. Rome: Carocci.
  14. Fabbri, L. (2019). Active research methodologies: what action, participation, learning and research have to do with each other. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, pp. 7-18.
  15. Fabbri, L. (2024a), Sociomaterial artefacts as educational paradigms. In J. Magrini and M. Parente (eds.). Educazione zerosei: sistema integrato e poli per l’infanzia. Riflessioni e confronti a partire dall’esperienza formativa toscana, Florence, Centro regionale di documentazione per l’infanzia e l’adolescenza, pp. 108-115.
  16. Fabbri, L. (2024b). Transformative Learning in the Era of Post-Reflexivity. Adult Education Critical Issue, 4(1), pp. 1-6.
  17. Fabbri, L. & Melacarne C. (2023). A post-humanist epistemology of reflexivity?: Educational Reflective Practices, 1, pp. 5-21.
  18. Ferrando, F. (2020). Leveling the Posthuman Playing Field. Theology and Science, 18(1), pp. 1-6.
  19. Foucault, M. (1967). Le parole e le cose: un’archeologia delle scienze umane. Milano: Rizzoli.
  20. Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice theorising anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organisation, 23(5), pp. 680-698.
  21. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575-599.
  22. Lave, J. (2019). Learning and Everyday Life. Access, Participation, and Changing Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Murris, K. (ed.) (2020). Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines. Abingdon and New York, US: Routledge.
  24. Nicolaides, A. (2023). Generative Knowing. Principles, Methods, and Disposition of an Emerging Adult Learning Theory. Gorham, US: Myers Education.
  25. Niesche, R. & Gowlett, C. (2019). Entangling Karen Barad with/in educational leadership. In Niesche R. and Gowlett C. (eds.). Social, Critical and Political Theories for Educational Leadership. Singapore: Springer, pp. 111-134.
  26. Picard, E.A. (2016). Getting’ a little crafty: Teachers Pay Teachers©, Pinterest© and neo-liberalism in new materialist feminist research. Gender and Education, 1, pp. 1-20.
  27. Quinn, J. (2024). Invisible Education. Posthuman explorations of everyday learning. Abingdon and New York, US: Routledge.
  28. Ringrose, J., Warfield, K. & Zarabadi, S. (eds.) (2020). Feminist posthumanisms, new materialisms and education. Abingdon and New York, US: Routledge.
  29. Said, E.W. (1979). Orientalism. New York, US: Vintage Books.
  30. Sidebottom, K. (2019). Disruptive Pedagogies for Teacher Education: The Power of Potentia in Posthuman Times. In Taylor, C.A. & Bayley, A. (eds.). Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. Cham, SW: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 217-236.
  31. Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., Sandlin, L., Wallin, J. & Weaver, J.A. (2014). Toward a posthuman education. Journal of curriculum theorising, 30(2), pp. 39-55.
  32. Somerville, M. (2016). The post-human I: Encountering “data” in new materialism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(9), pp. 1161-1172.
  33. Strom, K.J. (2015). Teaching as assemblage: Negotiating learning and practice in the first year of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), pp. 321-333.
  34. Strom, K.J. (2018). “That’s Not Very Deleuzian”: Thoughts on interrupting the exclusionary nature of “High Theory”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), pp. 104-113.
  35. Strom, K.J. & Lupinacci, J. (2019). Putting Posthuman Theories to Work in Educational Leadership Programmes. In C.A. Taylor and A. Bayley (eds.). Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. Cham, SW: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 103-122.
  36. Strom, K.J. & Martin, A.D. (2022). Toward a critical posthuman understanding of teacher development and practice: A multi-case study of beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, pp. 1-11.
  37. Taylor, C.A. (2020). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. In Ringrose, J., Warfield, K., & Zarabadi, S. (eds.). Feminist posthumanisms, new materialisms and education. Abington and New York, US: Routledge, pp. 47-62.
  38. Taylor, C.A. (2021). Knowledge matters: Five propositions concerning the reconceptualisation of knowledge in feminist new materialist, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches. In Murris, K. (ed.), Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines. An introduction guide. Abington and New York, US: Routledge, pp. 22-42.
  39. Taylor, C. A. & Bayley, A. (eds.) (2019). Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research, Cham, SW: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martina Capaccioli, Are we human? Some examples for mapping non-linear educational practices in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1/2024, pp 258-273, DOI: 10.3280/erp1-2024oa18452