Once they weren’t called cognitive processes

Journal title RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Author/s Fiorella Giusberti, Gianni Brighetti
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 117-127 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rip2021oa12601
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The purpose of this contribution is to highlight a line of research that was already present in the first decades of the rich production of Renzo Canestrari, extremely innovative for that period, and related to the study of mental processes, that today constitute the foundations of cognitive psychology. These works represent an anticipative intuition not only of research fields, but also of empirical and experimental research methodologies associated with the study of the quantitative aspects of mental processes. Of particular importance are the studies on the visual perception of Gestalt imprint, enriched with experimental analyses also often applied to clinical cases. We should also not forget the contribution offered by Canestrari to the psychological study of social changes occurred in the post-war period.

Keywords: ; gestalt psychology; optical illusions; cognitive processes; language and thought

  1. Bozzi, P. (1986). Sugli ultimi trentʼanni di psicologia scientifica italiana. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane (Numero speciale del ventesimo anno), 3, 59-73.
  2. Canestrari, R. 5306, 5307, 5410, 5412, 5503, 5504, 5505, 5506, 5507, 5510, 5516, 5601, 5602, 5603, 5705, 5706, 5715, 5716, 5802, 6104, 6106, 6306, 6505, 6607.
  3. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton: Den Haag.
  4. Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, n. 270, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  6. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  7. Hagen, R.M. & Hagen, R. (2010). What great paintings say. Masterpieces in Detail: Vol. 1. Köln: Taschen.
  8. Inghilleri, P. (a cura di) (2009). Psicologia culturale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  9. Lévinas, E. (1961). Totalité et Infini: Essai sur Lʼextériorité. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff (trad. ital. Totalità e infinito. Saggio sull’esteriorità. Milano: Jaca Book, 1971).
  10. Marr, D. (1982). A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual Information. San Francisco (Cal.): Freeman.
  11. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  12. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  13. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242-258. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
  14. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521-533. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
  15. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of jurors decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519-557.

Fiorella Giusberti, Gianni Brighetti, Una volta non si chiamavano processi cognitivi in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA" 2/2021, pp 117-127, DOI: 10.3280/rip2021oa12601