The Economic Psychology of Tax Compliance and Charitable Giving: A Comparative Analysis and Research Agenda

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Cinzia Castiglioni, Edoardo Lozza
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 50 P. 1-50 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rip2021oa12237
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

Finding mechanisms to promote prosocial spending behavior is fundamental to the well-being of our societies and is more urgent than ever in a time of key global challenges, including social and economic inequalities. Tax payment and charitable giving can be seen as two complementary ways to financially provide for the common good and, like many other social dilemmas, they both involve a conflict between what is good for oneself and what is good for others. The aim of the present article is to perform a comparative analysis of the main determinants of tax behavior and charitable giving to identify some common antecedents to gain insight to promote pro-social financial decisions at large. Despite the intrinsic differences, several commonalities were found, thus suggesting a transcending common core. By identifying well-established literature and under-investigated areas, a new research agenda is formulated.

Finding mechanisms to promote prosocial spending behavior is fundamental to the well-being of our societies and is more urgent than ever in a time of key global challenges, including social and economic inequalities. Tax payment and charitable giving can be seen as two complementary ways to financially provide for the common good and, like many other social dilemmas, they both involve a conflict between what is good for oneself and what is good for others. The aim of the present article is to perform a comparative analysis of the main determinants of tax behavior and charitable giving to identify some common antecedents to gain insight to promote pro-social financial decisions at large. Despite the intrinsic differences, several commonalities were found, thus suggesting a transcending common core. By identifying well-established literature and under-investigated areas, a new research agenda is formulated.

Parole chiave:; tax behavior; charitable giving; review; prosocial spending; common good

  1. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635-652.
  2. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness Runs in a Circular Motion: Evidence for a Positive Feedback Loop between Prosocial Spending and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347-355. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5
  3. Aknin, L. B., Mayraz, G., & Helliwell, J. F. (2017). The emotional consequences of donation opportunities. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 169-177. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1163409
  4. Ali, M., Fjeldstad, O.-H., & Sjursen, I. H. (2014). To Pay or Not to Pay? Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Taxation in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and South Africa. World Development, 64, 828-842. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.006
  5. Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
  6. Alm, J. (1999). Tax Compliance and Administration. In W. B. Hildreth & J. A. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook on Taxation (pp. 741-768). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
  7. Alm, J. (2019). What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353-388. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12272
  8. Alm, J., Bernasconi, M., Laury, S., Lee, D. J., & Wallace, S. (2017). Culture, compliance, and confidentiality: Taxpayer behavior in the United States and Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 140, 176-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.018
  9. Alm, J., Jackson, B., & McKee, M. (1992). Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 1018-1026.
  10. Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., & McKee, M. (1992). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National tax journal, 45(1), 107-114.
  11. Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes?. Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21-38. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M
  12. Alm, J., Sanchez, I., & Juan, A. D. (1995). Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compli ance. Kyklos, 48(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1995.tb02312.x
  13. Alm, J., Schulze, W. D., Bose, C. von, & Yan, J. (2019). Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance. Southern Economic Journal, 86(2), 638-666. DOI: 10.1002/soej.12374
  14. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002
  15. Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1047-1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004
  16. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477. DOI: 10.2307/2234133
  17. Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.2307/2118508
  18. Batson, C. D. & Coke, J. (1981) Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping. In Rushton & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 167-187). Erlbaum.
  19. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7), 1605-1623. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9
  20. Andriani, L. (2016). Tax morale and prosocial behaviour: Evidence from a Palestinian survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(3), 821-841. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bev019
  21. Anik, L., Aknin, L., Norton, M. I., & Dunn, E. W. (2011). Feeling good about giving. The benefits (and costs) of self- interested charitable behavior. In D. M. Oppenheimer & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving (pp. 3-13). London: Psychology Press.
  22. Arumi, A. M., Wooden, R., Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Duffett, A., & Ott, A. (2005). The Charitable Impulse. New York: Public Agenda.
  23. Bachke, M. E., Alfnes, F., & Wik, M. (2017). Information and donations to development aid projects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 23-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.015
  24. Balconi, M., Crivelli, D., Castiglioni, C., & Lozza, E. (2019). Social frame and tax compliance modulate electrophysiological and autonomic responses following tax-related decisions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41156-7
  25. Baranzini, A., & Carattini, S. (2017). Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: Testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19(1), 197-227. DOI: 10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
  26. Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 209-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002
  27. Barkworth, J. M., & Murphy, K. (2015). Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: The importance of emotion. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(3), 254-273. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951649
  28. Baron, J., & Szymanska, E. (2011). Heuristics and biases in charity. In D. M. Oppenheimer, C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 215-235). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  29. Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When It Costs You. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319-325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x
  30. Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035-1054. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20145
  31. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412-414. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509
  32. Batista, C., Silverman, D., & Yang, D. (2015). Directed giving: Evidence from an inter-household transfer experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 2-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.008
  33. Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Weiss, A., Torgler, B., Fooken, J., Fuller, J., Schaffner, M., Banuri, S., Hassanein, M., Alarcón-García, G., Aldemir, C., Apostol, O., Bank Weinberg, D., Batrancea, I., Belianin, A., Zukauskas, S. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 102191. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191
  34. Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial Motivation: Is it ever Truly Altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8
  35. Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (pp. 282-316). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  36. Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 65-74. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65
  37. Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
  38. Becker, G. S. (1974). A Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063-1093. DOI: 10.1086/260265
  39. Bekkers, R. (2006). Traditional and Health-Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 349-366. DOI: 10.1177/019027250606900404
  40. Bekkers, R., & Schuyt, T. (2008). And Who Is Your Neighbor? Explaining Denominational Differences in Charitable Giving and Volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 50(1), 74-96.
  41. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5) , 924-973. DOI: 10.1177/0899764010380927
  42. Belk, R. W., & Wallendorf, M. (1990). The sacred meanings of money. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(1), 35-67. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4870(90)90046-C
  43. Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12-29. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.198
  44. Benz, M., & Meier, S. (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field? – Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 268-281. DOI: 10.1007/s10683-007-9192-y
  45. Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2007). Public charity offer as a proximate factor of evolved reputation-building strategy: An experimental analysis of a real-life situation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 277-284. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.002
  46. Bergquist, M., Nyström, L., & Nilsson, A. (n.d.). Feeling or following? A fieldexperiment comparing social norms-based and emotions-based motives encouraging pro-environmental donations. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, n/a(n/a). DOI: 10.1002/cb.1813
  47. Berman, G., & Davidson, S. (2003). Do Donors Care? Some Australian Evidence. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(4), 421-429. DOI: 10.1023/B:VOLU.0000007467.74816.a4
  48. Bernheim, B. D. (1986). On the Voluntary and Involuntary Provision of Public Goods. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 789-793.
  49. Betancourt, H. (1990). An Attribution-Empathy Model of Helping Behavior: Behavioral Intentions and Judgments of Help-Giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(3), 573-591. DOI: 10.1177/0146167290163015
  50. Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 451-468. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1390-7
  51. Bowman, W. (2006). Should Donors Care About Overhead Costs? Do They Care? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 288-310. DOI: 10.1177/0899764006287219
  52. Brizi, A., Giacomantonio, M., Schumpe, B. M., & Mannetti, L. (2015). Intention to pay taxes or to avoid them: The impact of social value orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50, 22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.005
  53. Brooks, N., & Doob, A. H., (1990). Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In M. L. Friedland (Ed.), Securing compliance: Seven case studies (pp. 122-164). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  54. Buraschi, A., & Cornelli, F. (2002). Donations (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 331485). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=331485.
  55. Butera, L., & Horn, J. (2020). “Give less but give smart”: Experimental evidence on the effects of public information about quality on giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 171, 59-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.011
  56. CAF, Charities Aid Foundation (2016). World Giving Index 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-uspublications/1950a_wgi_2016_report_web_v2_241016.pdf?sfvrsn=750cd540_4.
  57. Calvet Christian, R., & Alm, J. (2014). Empathy, sympathy, and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 62-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.001
  58. Cao, X. (2016). Framing charitable appeals: The effect of message framing and perceived susceptibility to the negative consequences of inaction on donation intention. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(1), 3-12. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.1536
  59. Capraro, V., Jagfeld, G., Klein, R., Mul, M., & de Pol, I. van. (2019). Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4
  60. Castiglioni, C., Lozza, E., & Bonanomi, A. (2019). The Common Good Provision Scale (CGP): A Tool for Assessing People’s Orientation towards Economic and Social Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(2), 370. DOI: 10.3390/su11020370
  61. Castiglioni, C., Lozza, E., & Bosio, A. C. (2018). Lay People Representations on the Common Good and Its Financial Provision. SAGE Open, 8(4), 2158244018807247. DOI: 10.1177/2158244018807247
  62. Castiglioni, C., Lozza, E., Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Lewis, A. (2014). Is benefit fraud more or less wrong than tax evasion? An exploratory study in the perspective of fiscal psychology. Psicologia Sociale, 9(3), 291-308. DOI: 10.1482/78351
  63. Castiglioni, C., Lozza, E., van Dijk, E., & van Dijk, W. W. (2019). Two sides of the same coin? An investigation of the effects of frames on tax compliance and charitable giving. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0247-4
  64. Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2015). Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 65-82.
  65. Caviola, L., Faulmüller, N., Everett, Jim. A. C., Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2014). The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives? Judgment and Decision Making, 9(4), 303-316.
  66. Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., & O’Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83-103. DOI: 10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00027-6
  67. Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2009). Framing Charity Advertising: Influences of Message Framing, Image Valence, and Temporal Framing on a Charitable Appeal1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910-2935. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00555.x
  68. Charity Navigator (2014). Charity navigator: your guide to intelligent giving. Retrieved from http:// www.charitynavigator.org/.
  69. Charles, C., & Kim, M. (2016). Do Donors Care About Results? An Analysis of Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 864-884. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1137775
  70. Chirico, M., Inman, R. P., Loeffler, C., MacDonald, J., & Sieg, H. (2016). An Experimental Evaluation of Notification Strategies to Increase Property Tax Compliance: Free-Riding in the City of Brotherly Love. Tax Policy and the Economy, 30(1), 129-161. DOI: 10.1086/685595
  71. Cialdini, R. B., Baumann, D. J., & Kenrick, D. T. (1981). Insights from sadness: A three-step model of the development of altruism as hedonism. Developmental Review, 1(3), 207-223. DOI: 10.1016/0273-2297(81)90018-6
  72. Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1(1), 3-15. DOI: 10.1080/15534510500181459
  73. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
  74. Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (1976). Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 907-914. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.907
  75. Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 749-758. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.749
  76. Coleman, S. (1996). The Minnesota income tax compliance experiment: State tax results [MPRA Paper]. Minnesota Department of Revenue. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4827/.
  77. Coricelli, G., Joffily, M., Montmarquette, C., & Villeval, M. C. (2010). Cheating, emotions, and rationality: An experiment on tax evasion. Experimental Economics, 13(2), 226-247. DOI: 10.1007/s10683-010-9237-5
  78. Coricelli, G., Rusconi, E., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). Tax evasion and emotions: An empirical test of re-integrative shaming theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 49-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.002
  79. Cremer, D. D., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S5-S18. DOI: 10.1002/per.418
  80. Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Scheines, R. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 15-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.002
  81. Culiberg, B., & Bajde, D. (2014). Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 271-282. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1870-4
  82. Cullis, J., Jones, P., Lewis, A., Castiglioni, C., & Lozza, E. (2015). Do poachers make harsh gamekeepers? Attitudes to tax evasion and to benefit fraud. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 124-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2015.08.003
  83. Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McKee, M. (2001). Cross Cultural Comparisions of Tax Compliance Behavior (No. paper0103; International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU). International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ays/ispwps/paper0103.html.
  84. Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Routledge.
  85. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social Dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169-193. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
  86. De Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2017). Government support and charitable donations: A meta-analysis of the crowding-out hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 301-319. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muw044
  87. Fiala, L., & Noussair, C. N. (2017). Charitable Giving, Emotions, and the Default Effect. Economic Inquiry, 55(4), 1792-1812.
  88. DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1-56. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr050
  89. Devos, K. (2014). Factors Influencing Individual Taxpayer Compliance Behaviour. Springer Science & Business Media.
  90. Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2011). Affective motivations to help others: A two-stage model of donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 361-376. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.697
  91. Donkers, B., van Diepen, M., & Franses, P. H. (2017). Do charities get more when they ask more often? Evidence from a unique field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 58-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.-socec.2016.05.006
  92. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  93. Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., Newton, C., Ristl, A., Schaffner, M., & Torgler, B. (2016). Tax compliance and psychic costs: Behavioral experimental evidence using a physiological marker. Journal of Public Economics, 134, 9-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.007
  94. Duncan, B. (2004). A theory of impact philanthropy. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2159-2180. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00037-9
  95. Dwenger, N., Kleven, H., Rasul, I., & Rincke, J. (2016). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations for Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Germany. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 203-232. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20150083
  96. Eckel, C. C., Herberich, D. H., & Meer, J. (2017). A field experiment on directed giving at a public university. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 66-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.007
  97. Edwards, J. (2007). The costs of public income redistribution and private charity. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 21, 3-20.
  98. Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Attitudes and Donation Behavior When Reading Positive and Negative Charity Appeals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(4), 444-474. DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2018.1452828
  99. Fajardo, T. M., Townsend, C., & Bolander, W. (2018). Toward an Optimal Donation Solicitation: Evidence from the Field of the Differential Influence of Donor-Related and Organization-Related Information on Donation Choice and Amount . Journal of Marketing, 82(2), 142-152. DOI: 10.1509/jm.15.0511
  100. Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Changing the focus on volunteering: An investigation of volunteers’ multiple contributions to a charitable organization . Journal of Management, 27(2), 191-211. DOI: 10.1177/014920630102700204
  101. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7
  102. Fellner, G., Sausgruber, R., & Traxler, C. (2013). Testing Enforcement Strategies in the Field: Threat, Moral Appeal and Social Information. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 634-660. DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12013
  103. Fennell, C. C., & Fennell, L. A. (2003). Fear and Greed in Tax Policy: A Qualitative Research Agenda. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 13, 75.
  104. Ferrari, L., & Randisi, S. (2011). Psicologia fiscale. Illusioni e decisioni dei contribuenti. Raffaello Cortina Editore. https://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/21840.
  105. Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 283-300. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007744326393
  106. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397-404. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9
  107. Fochmann, M., Hechtner, F., Kirchler, E., & Mohr, P. (2019). When Happy People Make Society Unhappy: Incidental Emotions Affect Compliance Behavior (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3259071). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3259071.
  108. Fong, C. M. (2007). Evidence from an Experiment on Charity to Welfare Recipients: Reciprocity, Altruism and the Empathic Responsiveness Hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1008-1024. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02076.x
  109. Fortin, B., Lacroix, G., & Villeval, M.-C. (2007). Tax evasion and social interact ions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11), 2089-2112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.005
  110. Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2004). Taxation and Conditional Cooperation (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 662083). Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.662083
  111. Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.006
  112. Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., & Jones, K. (2015). Donor types and paternalism. Department of Economics Discussion Paper 53/14, Monash Business School. Retrieved from http://www.monash.edu/business/economics/research/publications/2014/5314deconstructinggivinggangadharangrossmanjones.pdf.
  113. Gangl, K., Hartl, B., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2019). The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034
  114. Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities’ interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New Ideas in Psychology, 37, 13-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001
  115. Gąsiorowska, A., & Hełka, A. (2012). Psychological consequences of money and money attitudes in dictator game. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 43(1), 20-26. DOI: 10.2478/v10059-012-0003-8
  116. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A33-Nation Study. Science, 332(6033), 1100-1104. DOI: 10.1126/science.1197754
  117. Genevsky, A., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Knutson, B. (2013). Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(43), 17188-17196. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-13.2013
  118. Ghosh, D., & Crain, T. L. (1995). Ethical standards, attitudes toward risk, and intentional noncompliance: An experimental investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 353-365. DOI: 10.1007/BF00872098
  119. Gillitzer, C., & Sinning, M. (2020). Nudging businesses to pay their taxes: Does timing matter? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 284-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.020
  120. Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, Money, and Morality. Psychological Science, 25(2), 414-421. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613506438
  121. Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A Signaling Explanation for Charity. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019-1028.
  122. Gordon, T. P., & Khumawala, S. B. (1999). The demand for not-for-profit financial statements: A model of individual giving. Journal of Accounting Literature, 18, 31-56.
  123. Grace, D., & Griffin, D. (2006). Exploring conspicuousness in the context of donation behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(2), 147-154. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.24
  124. Grace, D., & Griffin, D. (2009). Conspicuous donation behaviour: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(1), 14-25. DOI: 10.1002/cb.270
  125. Grasmick, H. G., Jr, R. J. B., & Cochran, J. K. (1991). “Render Unto Caesar What Is Caesar’s”: Religiosity and Taxpayers’ Inclinations to Cheat. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 251-266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00356.x
  126. Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
  127. Guéguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2013). Behavioral consequences of money: When the automated teller machine reduces helping behavior. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 47, 103-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2013.09.004
  128. Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D., & Vlaev, I. (2017). The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
  129. Hansen, P., Kergozou, N., Knowles, S., & Thorsnes, P. (2014). Developing Countries in Need: Which Characteristics Appeal Most to People when Donating Money? The Journal of Development Studies, 50(11), 1494-1509. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2014.925542
  130. Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). The Prestige Motive for Making Charitable Transfers. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 277-282.
  131. Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622-1625. DOI: 10.1126/science.1140738
  132. Hartner, M., Rechberger, S., Kirchler, E., & Schabmann, A. (2008). Procedural Fairness and Tax Compliance. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 137-152.
  133. Haynes, M., Thornton, J., & Jones, S. (2004). An exploratory study on the effect of positive (warmth appeal) and negative (guilt appeal) print imagery on donation behaviour in animal welfare. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences-Papers (Archive). https://ro.uow.edu.au/hbspapers/80.
  134. Heldt, T. (2005). Conditional Cooperation in the Field: Cross-Country Skiers. Sweden. Mimeo, Uppsala University.
  135. Henderson, B. C., & Kaplan, S. E. (2005). An Examination of the Role of Ethics in Tax Compliance Decisions. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 27(1), 39-72. DOI: 10.2308/jata.2005.27.1.39
  136. Heyman, J., & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets. Psychological Science, 15(11), 787-793. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.x
  137. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723-742.
  138. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowksi , S. Dziurawiec , and R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
  139. Holler, M., Hoelzl, E., Kirchler, E., Leder, S., & Mannetti, L. (2008). Framing of information on the use of public finances, regulatory fit of recipients and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 597-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.01.001
  140. Homer, P. M., & Yoon, S.-G. (1992). Message Framing and the Interrelationships among Ad-Based Feelings, Affect, and Cognition. Journal of Advertising, 21(1), 19-33. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1992.10673357
  141. Hopfensitz, A., & Reuben, E. (2009). The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment. The Economic Journal, 119(540), 1534-1559. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02288.x
  142. Hsu, J. L., Liang, G.Y., & Tien, C.P. (2005). Social Concerns and Willingness to Support Charities. Social Behavior and Personality: An international Journal, 33, 189-200 DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.2.189
  143. Irvin, R. A. (2005). State Regulation of Nonprofit Organizations: Accountability Regardless of Outcome. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(2), 161-178. DOI: 10.1177/0899764004272189
  144. Jackson, N. C., & Mathews, R. M. (1995). Using Public Feedback to Increase Contributions to a Multipurpose Senior Center. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(4), 449-455. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-449
  145. James, S., & Alley, C. (2002). Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27-42.
  146. James, S., McGee, R. W., Benk, S., & Budak, T. (2019). How seriously do taxpayers regard tax evasion? A survey of opinion in England. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22(3), 563-575. DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-09-2018-0056
  147. Jenni, K., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235-257. DOI : 10.1023/A:1007740225484.
  148. Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., & Wyer, R. S. (2014). Impact of money on emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 228-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.013
  149. Johansson-Stenman, O., & Svedsäter, H. (2008). Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1). DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1898
  150. Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1342-1353. DOI: 10.1177/014616702236834
  151. Jones, K. (2017). Government or charity? Preferences for welfare provision by ethnicity. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 72-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.011
  152. Karataş, M., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2020). A Construal Level Account of the Impact of Religion and God on Prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0146167219895145. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219895145
  153. Karlan, D., & Wood, D. H. (2017). The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.005
  154. Kettle, S., Hernandez Hernandez, M. A., Ruda, S., & Sanders, M. (2016). Behavioral interventions in tax compliance: Evidence from Guatemala (No. WPS7690; pp. 1-40). The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/479561467989537366/Behavioral-interventions-in-tax-complianceevidence-from-Guatemala.
  155. Kirchler, E. (1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 117-131. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80080-8
  156. Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
  157. Kirchler, E., & Hoelzl, E. (2017). Economic Psychology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  158. Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
  159. Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002
  160. Knowles, S. R., Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2012). Predictors of Young People’s Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2096-2110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x
  161. Koessler, A.-K., Torgler, B., Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2019). Commitment to pay taxes: Results from field and laboratory experiments. European Economic Review, 115, 78-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.02.006
  162. Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008
  163. Lange, P. A. M. V., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T. N. M., & Vugt, M. V. (2007). From Games to Giving: Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 375-384. DOI: 10.1080/01973530701665223
  164. Lee, B. A., & Farrell, C. R. (2003). Buddy, Can You Spare A Dime?: Homelessness, Panhandling, and the Public. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 299-324. DOI: 10.1177/1078087402238804
  165. Lewis, A. (1982). The social psychology of taxation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 151-158. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00523.x
  166. Li, S. X., Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Brown, T. L. (2011). Giving to government: Voluntary taxation in the lab. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1190-1201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.005
  167. Li, S. X., Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Larson, T. (2013). Who’s in Charge? Donor Targeting Enhances Voluntary Giving to Government (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2293407). Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2293407
  168. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  169. López-Pérez, R., & Ramirez-Zamudio, A. (2020). An experimental test of two policies to increase donations to public projects. International Review of Law and Economics, 62, 105892. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2020.105892
  170. Lozza, E., & Castiglioni, C. (2018). Tax climate in the national press: A new tool in tax behaviour research. DOI: 10.23668/psycharchives.1748
  171. Luccasen, R. A., & Thomas, M. K. (2020). Voluntary taxation and the arts. Journal of Cultural Economics. DOI: 10.1007/s10824-020-09376-2
  172. Ma, Y., Wang, C., & Han, S. (2011). Neural responses to perceived pain in others predict real-life monetary donations in different socioeconomic contexts. NeuroImage, 57(3), 1273-1280. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.003
  173. Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P. A. M., Van Doesum, N. J., & Pollet, T. V. (2019). What are the most powerful predictors of charitable giving to victims of typhoon Haiyan: Prosocial traits, socio-demographic variables, or eye cues? Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 217-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.024
  174. Martin, R., & Randal, J. (2008). How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(1), 228-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.001
  175. Mascagni, G. (2018). From the Lab to the Field: A Review of Tax Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 273-301. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12201
  176. Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L., & Evans, T. W. (1992). Moodcongruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 119-132. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.119
  177. McBarnet, D. J. (2004). Crime, compliance and control. Burlington, VT: Dartmouth Publishing.
  178. McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2006). Thinking about tax. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 106-135. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.106
  179. McKerchar, M., Bloomquist, K., & Pope, J. (2013). Indicators of Tax Morale: An Exploratory Study. EJournal of Tax Research, 11, 5.
  180. Meier, S. (2007). A Survey of economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field (pp. 51-88). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  181. Metzger, L., & Günther, I. (2019a). Is it what you say or how you say it? The impact of aid effectiveness information and its framing on donation behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 83, 101461. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2019.101461
  182. Metzger, L., & Günther, I. (2019b). Making an impact? The relevance of information on aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment. Journal of De v e lopment Economics, 136, 18-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.015
  183. Molero, J. C., & Pujol, F. (2012). Walking Inside the Potential Tax Evader’s Mind: Tax Morale Does Matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 151-162. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0955-1
  184. Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Mental Accounting and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence for the Effect of Mental Segregation of Tax Due and Revenue on Compliance. Public Finance Review, 45(1), 118-139. DOI: 10.1177/1091142115602063
  185. Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  186. Myles, G. D., & Naylor, R. A. (1996). A model of tax evasion with group conformity and social customs. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.1016/0176-2680(95)00037-2
  187. Niemirowski, P., Wearing, A.J., Baldwin, S., Leonard, B., & Mobbs, C. (2002). The influence of tax related behaviours, beliefs, attitudes and values on Australian taxpayer compliance. Is tax avoidance intentional and how serious an offence is it? Sydney: 5th International Conference on Tax Administration. ATAX UNSW.
  188. Niesta Kayser, D., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., & Frey, D. (2010). Why mood affects help giving, but not moral courage: comparing two types of prosocial behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1136-1157.
  189. Oktaviani, R., Kurnia, H., Sunarto, S., & Udin, U. (2020). The effects of taxpayer knowledge and taxation socialization on taxpayer compliance: The role of taxpayer awareness in developing Indonesian economy. Accounting, 6(2), 89-96.
  190. Olsen, J., Kasper, M., Enachescu, J., Benk, S., Budak, T., & Kirchler, E. (2018). Emotions and tax compliance among small business owners: An experimental survey. International Review of Law and Economics, 56, 42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.05.004
  191. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  192. Onu, D. (2016). Measuring Tax Compliance Attitudes: What surveys can tell us about tax compliance behaviour. In J. Hasseldine (Ed.), Advances in Taxation (pp. 173-190). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  193. Onu, D., & Oats, L. (2018). Tax Talk: An Exploration of Online Discussions Among Taxpayers. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 931-944. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3032-y
  194. Ortega, D., & Scartascini, C. (2020). Don’t blame the messenger. The Delivery method of a message matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 170, 286-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.008
  195. Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2003). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83-102. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00131-3
  196. Paramita, W., Septianto, F., & Tjiptono, F. (2020a). The distinct effects of gratitude and pride on donation choice and amount. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101972. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101972
  197. Parsons, L. M. (2007). The Impact of Financial Information and Voluntary Disclosures on Contributions to Not-For-Profit Organizations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), 179-196. DOI: 10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.179
  198. Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005). Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
  199. Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 1032-1045. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.416
  200. Pickhardt, M., & Prinz, A. (2014). Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion - A survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.006
  201. Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., & Jones, W. H. (2006). Giving to others during national tragedy: The effects of altruistic and egoistic motivations on long-term giving. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(1), 171-184. DOI: 10.1177/0265407506060185
  202. Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H.-W. (1990). Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 27-65. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331
  203. Pommerehne, W. W., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1), 161-170. DOI: 10.1007/BF00130416
  204. Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47-67. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4870(88)90031-1
  205. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4-28. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.17.1.4
  206. Rand, D. G., Yoeli, E., & Hoffman, M. (2014). Harnessing Reciprocity to Promote Cooperation and the Provisioning of Public Goods. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 263-269. DOI: 10.1177/2372732214548426
  207. Ribar, D. C., & Wilhelm, M. O. (2002). Altruistic and Joy- of- Giving Motivations in Charitable Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 425-457. DOI: 10.1086/338750
  208. Roberts, R. D. (1984). A positive model of private charity and public transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 92(1), 136-148. DOI: 10.1086/261212
  209. Roberts, J. A., & Roberts, C. R. (2012). Money matters: Does the symbolic presence of money affect charitable giving and attitudes among adolescents? Young Consumers, 13(4), 329-336. DOI: 10.1108/17473611211282572
  210. Rodriguez-Justicia, D., & Theilen, B. (2018). Education and tax morale. Journal of Economic Psychology, 64, 18-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.10.001
  211. Rubaltelli, E., Hysenbelli, D., Dickert, S., Mayorga, M., & Slovic, P. (2020). Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness- to- donate decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 304-322. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2164
  212. Sælen, H., & Kallbekken, S. (2011). A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2181-2190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.024
  213. Sargeant, A., Ford, J., & West, D. C. (2000). Widening the appeal of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 5(4), 318-332. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.123
  214. Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own. In S. B. Chase (Ed.), Problems in public expenditure analysis (pp. 127-176). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  215. Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (2002). The Boston Area Diary Study and the Moral Citizenship of Care. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(1), 47-71. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014758113132
  216. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Love, A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1997). Responses to different charity appeals: The impact of donor characteristics on the amount of donations. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 548-560. DOI: 10.1108/03090569710176574
  217. Schlegelmilch, Bodo. B. (1998). Targeting of Fund-raising Appeals. – How to Identify Donors. European Journal of Marketing, 22(1), 31-40. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000005265
  218. Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: a New Branch of Public Finance. National Tax Journal, 12(4), 340-345.
  219. Schneider, F. (2015). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2014: Different Developments? Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 3(4), 7-29.
  220. Schuyt, T. N. M., Bekkers, R. H. F. P., & Smit, J. H. (2010). The philanthropy scale: A sociological perspective in measuring new forms of pro social behaviour. Social Work & Society, 8(1), 121-135.
  221. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10(1), 221-279.
  222. Septianto, F., & Tjiptono, F. (2019). The interactive effect of emotional appeals and past performance of a charity on the effectiveness of charitable advertising . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 189-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.013
  223. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God Is Watching You: Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803-809. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
  224. Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197-15200. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209746109
  225. Siemens, J. C., Raymond, M. A., Choi, Y., & Choi, J. (2020). The influence of message appeal, social norms and donation social context on charitable giving: Investigating the role of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 0(0), 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/10696679.2020.1717968
  226. Slavov, S. N. (2014). Public Versus Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 16(2), 222-258. DOI: 10.1111/jpet.12058
  227. Slovic, P. (2010). If I Look at the Mass I Will Never Act: Psychic Numbing and Genocide. In S. Roeser (Ed.), Emotions and Risky Technologies (pp. 37-59). Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8647-1_3
  228. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5-16. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022299422219
  229. Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777-787. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777_JMR6F
  230. Smith, G. E., & Berger, P. D. (1996). The Impact of Direct Marketing Appeals on Charitable Marketing Effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(3), 219-231. DOI: 10.1177/0092070396243003
  231. Smith, K.W., (1992). Reciprocity and fairness: Positive incentives for tax compliance. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 223-250). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  232. Smith, J. R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 363-386. DOI: 10.1002/casp.906
  233. Smith, K. D., Keating, J. P., & Stotland, E. (1989). Altruism reconsidered: The effect of denying feedback on a victim’s status to empathic witnesses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 641-650. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.641
  234. Smith, V. H., Kehoe, M. R., & Cremer, M. E. (1995). The private provision of public goods: Altruism and voluntary giving. Journal of Public Economics, 58(1), 107-126. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01455-W
  235. Song, Y., & Yarbrough, T. E. (1978). Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey . Public Administration Review, 38(5), 442-452. DOI: 10.2307/975503
  236. Srinivasan, T. N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339-346.
  237. Stack, S., & Kposowa, A. (2006). The Effect of Religiosity on Tax Fraud Acceptability: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 325-351. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00310.x
  238. Steinberg, R. (1991). Does Government Spending Crowd Out Donations? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 591-612. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01369.x
  239. Strahilevitz, M. A. (2011). A model of the value of giving to others compared to the value of having more for oneself: Implications for fundraisers seeking to maximize donor satisfaction. In D. M. Oppenheimer & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity, (pp. 15-34). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  240. Strielkowski, W., & Čábelková, I. (2015). Religion, Culture, and Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Religions, 6(2), 657-669. DOI: 10.3390/rel6020657
  241. Stürmer, S., & Snyder, M. (2009). The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior: Group Processes, Intergroup Relations, and Helping. John Wiley & Sons.
  242. Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions. The Economic Journal, 94(376), 772-787. DOI: 10.2307/2232294
  243. Tang, T. L.-P. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 197-202. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030130209
  244. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684-707. DOI: 10.2307/2667052
  245. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  246. Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The gift relationship. From human blood to social policy. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  247. Tong, L., Zheng, Y., & Zhao, P. (2013). Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 119-129. DOI: 10.1007/s11002-013-9224-7
  248. Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  249. Torgler, B. (2016). Tax compliance and data: What is available and what is needed. Australian Economic Review, 49(3), 352-364. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.12158
  250. Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2004). Does Culture Influence Tax Morale? Evidence from Different European Countries (Working Paper No. 2004-17). CREMA Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/214303.
  251. Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007). What Shapes Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes? Evidence from Multicultural European Countries. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 443-470. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00466.x
  252. Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 860-876. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000089
  253. Traxler, C. (2010). Social norms and conditional cooperative taxpayers. European Journal of Poli tical Economy, 26(1), 89-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.001
  254. Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., & Lynn, B. (2003). Impact of Personal and Situational Factors on Taxpayer Compliance: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 175-197. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026294332606
  255. Trussel, J. M., & Parsons, L. M. (2007). Financial Reporting Factors Affecting Donations to Charitable Organizations. Advances in Accounting, 23, 263-285. DOI: 10.1016/S0882-6110(07)23010-X
  256. Tullock, G. (1971). The Charity of the Uncharitable. Western Economic Journal; Oxford, 9(4). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297298061/citation/DFDC3F4E3A074B15PQ/1.
  257. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  258. Van Diepen, M., Donkers, B., & Franses, P. H. (2009). Does irritation induced by charitable direct mailings reduce donations? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(3), 180-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.03.007
  259. Van Dijke, M., Gobena, L. B., & Verboon, P. (2019). Make Me Want to Pay. A Three-Way Interaction Between Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Power on Voluntary Tax Compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632
  260. Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733-746. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733
  261. Van Rijn, J., Barham, B., & Sundaram-Stukel, R. (2017). An experimental approach to comparing similarity-and guilt-based charitable appeals. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 25-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.-socec.2017.02.004
  262. Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mayorga, M., & Peters, E. (2014). Compassion Fade: Affect and Charity Are Greatest for a Single Child in Need. PLoS ONE, 9(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100115
  263. Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  264. Vesterlund, L. (2006). Why do people give?. In W. E. Powell & R. S. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 568-590). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  265. Vogel, j. (1974). Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data. National Tax Journal, 27(4), 499-513.
  266. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156. DOI: 10.1126/science.1132491
  267. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely Activating the Concept of Money Changes Personal and Interpersonal Behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208-212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-
  268. 2008.00576.x.
  269. Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in Authorities and Power to Enforce Tax Compliance: An Empirical Analysis of the “Slippery Slope Framework.” Law & Policy, 32(4), 383-406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00327.x
  270. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/779008.
  271. Warr, P. G. (1983). The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters, 13(2), 207-211. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(83)90087-3
  272. Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299-309. DOI: 10.1177/0092070300282010
  273. Webley, P. (1991). Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge University Press.
  274. Webley, P., Cole, M., & Eidjar, O.-P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 141-155. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00026-5
  275. Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2007). Profiles of Supportive Alumni: Donors, Volunteers, and Those Who “Do It All.” International Journal of Educational Advancement, 7(1), 20-34. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ijea.2150044
  276. Wenzel, M. (2001). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: A field experiment. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 8. Canberra: Australian National University.
  277. Wenzel, M. (2003). Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy (pp. 41-70). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  278. Wenzel, M. (2004a). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213-228. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00168-X
  279. Wenzel, M. (2004b). The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 547-567. DOI: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000046433.57588.71
  280. Wenzel, M. (2005). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491-508. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.003
  281. Wenzel, M., & Taylor, N. (2004). An experimental evaluation of tax-reporting schedules: A case of evidence-based tax administration. Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 2785-2799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.001
  282. West, P. (2004). Conspicuous compassion: Why sometimes it really is cruel to be kind. London, UK: Civitas Institute of the Study of Civil Society.
  283. Wiepking, P. (2008). For the Love of Mankind: A Sociological Study on Charitable Giving. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/for-the-love-of-mankinda-sociological-study-on-charitable-giving.
  284. Wiepking, Pamala, & Heijnen, M. (2011). The giving standard: Conditional cooperation in the case of charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(1), 13-22. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.391
  285. Wiepking, Pamala, & Maas, I. (2009). Resources That Make You Generous: Effects of Social and Human Resources on Charitable Giving. Social Forces, 87(4), 1973-1995. DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0191
  286. Wierzbicki, J., & Zawadzka, A. M. (2016). The Effects of the Activation of Money and Credit Card vs. That of Activation of Spirituality - Which One Prompts Pro-Social Behaviours? Current Psychology, 35(3), 344-353. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-014-9299-1
  287. Wilhelm, M. O., & Bekkers, R. (2010). Helping Behavior, Dispositional Empathic Concern, and the Principle of Care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(1), 11-32. DOI: 10.1177/0190272510361435
  288. Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274-293. DOI: 10.1086/675927
  289. Wunderink, S. R. (2000). The economics of consumers’ gifts and legacies to charitable organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 5(3), 268-287. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.119
  290. Yitzhaki, S. (1974). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201-202.
  291. Zhou, X., Kim, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Money Helps When Money Feels: Money Anthropomorphism Increases Charitable Giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953-972. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucy012

  • Willingness to Financially Support the Healthcare System: Evidence from Two Experimental Studies during COVID-19 in Italy Cinzia Castiglioni, Giulia Sesini, Guendalina Graffigna, Edoardo Lozza, in International Journal of Public Administration /2024 pp.208
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2022.2111577

Cinzia Castiglioni, Edoardo Lozza, The Economic Psychology of Tax Compliance and Charitable Giving: A Comparative Analysis and Research Agenda in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA" 3/2021, pp 1-50, DOI: 10.3280/rip2021oa12237