Neighbour Relations In The Socially And Ethnically Diverse Centre Of A Northern Italian Town: The Role Of Housing Conditions

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Roberta Marzorati
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/105
Language English Pages 15 P. 50-64 File size 205 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2014-105004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

L’articolo indaga le relazioni fra vicini nel centro della città di Desio, nell’area metropolitana milanese. Due situazioni abitative sono considerate per valutare in che misura la prossimità spaziale può promuovere l’interazione sociale fra gruppi socialmente e culturalmente diversi. Lo studio mostra che le diseguaglianze socio-economiche, relative all’esperienza migratoria e visibili nelle condizioni abitative e nei modi di vivere il vicinato, sono cruciali per comprendere le relazioni sociali locali.

Keywords: Neighbourhood, Diversity, Encounter, Spatial Proximity, Housing, Migration

  1. Górny A., Toruńczyk-Ruiz S. (2014). Neighbourhood Attachment in Ethnically Diverse Areas: The Role of Interethnic Ties. Urban Studies, 51: 1000-1018. DOI: 10.1177/004209801349441
  2. Henning C., Lieberg M. (1996). Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 13: 3-26.
  3. Laurence J. (2013). Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37: 328-1349. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.78872
  4. Laurence J. (2011). The Effect of Ethnic Diversity and Community Disadvantage on Social Cohesion: A Multi-Level Analysis of Social Capital and Interethnic Relations in UK Communities. European Sociological Review, 27: 1-20. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcp057
  5. Lelévrier C. (2013). Social Mix Neighbourhood Policies and Social Interaction: The Experience of Newcomers in Three New Renewal Developments in France. Cities, 35: 409-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.00
  6. Letki N. (2008). Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods. Political Studies, 56: 99-126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00692
  7. Marzorati R. (2010). Non c’entrano niente con la via. Rappresentazioni della differenza e immaginari urbani nella trasformazione commerciale di due quartieri a Milano. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3: 1-26. DOI: 10.1423/3295
  8. Noble G. (2009). Everyday cosmopolitanism and the labour of intercultural community. In Wise A., Velayutham S. (eds). Everyday multiculturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Pastore F., Ponzo I. (2012). Concordia Discors. Convivenza e conflitto nei quartieri di immigrazione. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Phillips T. (2006). Parallel Lives? Challenging Discourses of British Muslim Self segregation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24: 25–40. DOI: 10.1068/d60
  11. Putnam, R.D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30: 137-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176
  12. Robson G., Butler T. (2001). Coming to Terms with London: Middle-Class Communities in a Global City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25: 70-86. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.0029
  13. Savage M., Bagnall G., Longhurst B. (2005). Globalization & Belonging. Sage: London.
  14. Semi G. (2007). Lo spazio del multiculturalismo quotidiano. In Colombo E., Semi G. (eds). Multiculturalismo quotidiano. Le pratiche della differenza. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Watson S. (2006). City Publics: The (Dis)enchantments of Urban Encounters. London: Routledge.
  15. Valentine G. (2008). Living with difference: reflections on geography of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32: 323-337. DOI: 10.1177/030913330808937
  16. Valentine G., Sadgrove J. (2013). Biographical Narratives of Encounter: The Significance of Mobility and Emplacement in Shaping Attitudes towards Difference. Urban Studies, 25: 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/004209801350414
  17. Vertovec S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and racial studies, 30: 1024–1054. DOI: 10.1080/0141987070159946
  18. Wessendorf S. (2013). Commonplace Diversity and the “ethos of Mixing”: Perceptions of Difference in a London Neighbourhood. Identities, 20: 407-22. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2013.82237
  19. Wessel T. (2009). Does Diversity in Urban Space Enhance Intergroup Contact and Tolerance? Geografiska Annaler, 91: 5-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00303
  20. Ambrosini M. Bonizzoni P. (2012). I nuovi vicini. Famiglie migranti e integrazione sul territorio. Milano: Fondazione Ismu.
  21. Amin A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34: 959-80. DOI: 10.1068/a3537
  22. Amin A. (2012). Land of strangers. Cambridge: Polity.
  23. Andreotti A., Le Galès P., Moreno Fuentes F.J. (2013). Controlling the Urban Fabric: the complex game of distance and proximity in European upper-middle-class residential strategy. International Urban and Regional Research, 37: 576-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177
  24. Bannister, J., Kearns A. (2013). The Function and Foundations of Urban Tolerance: Encountering and Engaging with Difference in the City. Urban Studies, 50: 2700-17. DOI: 10.1177/004209801347770
  25. Blokland, T. (2003) Urban Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Blokland T., Savage M. (2008). Networked Urbanism. Aldershot: Ashgate. Bonizzoni P., Marzorati R. (2015). Immigrant local incorporation pathways in small-scale cities: the case of Pakistani immigrants in a province of Northern Italy (forthcoming) Sociologica, 1.
  27. Camina M.M., Wood M.J. (2009). Parallel lives: towards a greater understanding of what mixed communities can offer. Urban Studies, 46: 459-480. DOI: 10.1177/004209800809936
  28. Cantle T. (2004). The End of Parallel Lives? The Report of the Community Cohesion Panel. London: Home Office.
  29. Cattell V., Dines N., Gesler W., Curtis S. (2008). Mingling, Observing, and Lingering: Everyday Public Spaces and Their Implications for Well-Being and Social Relations. Health & Place, 14: 544-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.00
  30. Forrest R., Kearns A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38: 2125-43. DOI: 10.1080/0042098012008708
  31. Wimmer A. (2004). Does ethnicity matter? Everyday group formation in three Swiss immigrant neighbourhoods. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27: 1-36. DOI: 10.1080/014198703200014792
  32. Wise A. (2005). Hope and Belonging in a Multicultural Suburb. Journal of Intercultural
  33. Studies, 26: 171-86. DOI: 10.1080/0725686050007438
  34. Wise A., Velayutham S. (2009). (eds.) Everyday Multiculturalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • La segregazione urbana: una riflessione tra Francia e Italia Roberta Marzorati, in SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 116/2018 pp.131
    DOI: 10.3280/SUR2018-116009

Roberta Marzorati, Neighbour Relations In The Socially And Ethnically Diverse Centre Of A Northern Italian Town: The Role Of Housing Conditions in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 105/2014, pp 50-64, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2014-105004