Denizens o ritardatari? Il ritardo nelle naturalizzazioni come strumento di contestazione

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Stefania Yapo
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/128
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 122-137 Dimensione file 215 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2022-128007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Can delays in naturalization be a form of claim against a restrictive citizenship regime? The article addresses this question by exploring the life and citizenship trajectories of long-term Peruvian residents in Italy. Using the concept of denizen status, the analysis reconstructs how naturalization does not imply an acceptance of the inclusion model at its base and shows the multifaceted weight of the status of citizen for those who is ready to step on the threshold of citizenship. The paper contributes to the debate on how migration and the related forms of substantive citizenship expose the contradictions of regimes based on a regulatory logic and indicate possible ways of reform.

  1. M. Antonsich (2016),«The “everyday” of banal nationalism – Ordinary people’s views on Italy and Italian», Political Geography, 54, pp. 32-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.07.006
  2. S. Aptekar (2015), The road to citizenship: what naturalization means for immigrants and the United States, New Brunswick, Rutgers, DOI: 10.36019/9780813569550
  3. E. Badenhoop (2017), «Calling for the Super Citizen: Citizenship ceremonies in the UK and Germany as techniques of subject-formation», Migration Studies, 5, 3, pp. 409-27,
  4. L. Baldassar, R. Raffaetà (2018),« It’s complicated, isn’t it: Citizenship and ethnic identity in a mobile world», Ethnicities, 18, 5, pp. 735-60, DOI: 10.1177/1468796816684148
  5. R. Bauböck (1994), Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  6. R. Bauböck (2010), «Studying citizenship constellations», Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 5, pp. 847-59.
  7. H. Bauder (2012), «Jus domicile: In pursuit of a citizenship of equality and social justice», Journal of International Political Theory, 8, 1-2, pp. 184-96,
  8. M.E. Benton (2010), A theory of denizenship, Doctoral dissertation, University College Lon-don, -- https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/624490/1/624490.pdf.
  9. U.D. Berg, C. Tamagno (2006), «El Quinto Suyo from above and from below: state agency and transnational political practices among Peruvian migrants in the US and Europe», Latino Studies, 4, 3, pp. 258-81,
  10. I. Bloemraad (2000), «Citizenship and immigration a current review», Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l’integration et de la migration internationale, 1, 1, pp. 9-37,
  11. I. Bloemraad (2002), «The North American Naturalization Gap: An Institutional Approach to Citizenship Acquisition in the United States and Canada», International Migration Review, 36, 1, pp. 193-228,
  12. I. Bloemraad (2004), «Who Claims Dual Citizenship? The Limits of Postnationalism, the Pos- sibilities of Transnationalism, and the Persistence of Traditional Citizenship», International Migration Review, 38, 2, pp. 389-426,
  13. I. Bloemraad (2018), «Theorising the power of citizenship as claims-making», Journal of Eth- nic and Migration Studies, 44, 1, pp. 4-26,
  14. I. Bloemraad, A. Sheares (2017), «Understanding membership in a world of global migration:(How) does citizenship matter?», International Migration Review, 51, 4, pp. 823-67,
  15. M. Caselli (2009), Vite transnazionali? Peruviani e peruviane a Milano, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  16. J. Carling (2015), Myth of return, in The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and nationalism, 1-2, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell,
  17. E. Codini, M. D’Odorico (2007), Una nuova cittadinanza. Per una riforma della legge del 1992, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  18. D. Cook-Martin (2013), The scramble for citizens: Dual nationality and state competition for immigrants, Stanford, Stanford University Press,
  19. L. Desforges, R. Jones, M. Woods (2005), «New geographies of citizenship», Citizenship Stu- dies, 9, 5, pp. 439-51, DOI: 10.1080/13621020500301213
  20. J. Dronkers, M.P. Vink (2012), «Explaining access to citizenship in Europe: How citizenship policies affect naturalization rate», European Union Politics, 13, 3, pp. 390-412, DOI: 10.1177/1465116512440510
  21. M.B. Erdal, T.H. Sagmo (2017), «Descent, birthplace and residence: Aligning principles of citizenship with realities of migrant transnationalism», Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 71, 4, pp. 208-19, DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2017.1369456
  22. Eurostat (2021), Immigration by age group, sex, and country of birth, -- https://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/databrowser/view/MIGR_IMM3CTBcustom_1224271/default/table?lang=en (last check on August 18, 2021).
  23. C. Finotelli, M. La Barbera, G. Echeverría (2018), «Beyond instrumental citizenship: the Spa- nish and Italian citizenship regimes in times of crisi», Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 14, pp. 2320-39, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1345838
  24. E. Gargiulo (2017), «The limits of local citizenship: administrative borders within the Italian municipalities», Citizenship Studies, 21, 3, pp. 327-43, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1277982
  25. C. Gathmann, O. Monscheuer (2020), Naturalization and citizenship: Who benefits?, Iza World of Labor, Avril
  26. E.N. Glenn (2011), «Constructing citizenship: Exclusion, subordination, and resistance», Ame- rican Sociological Review, 76, 1, pp. 1-24, DOI: 10.1177/0003122411398443
  27. T. Golash-Boza (2016), «Feeling like a Citizen, living as a Denizen: Deportees sense of belon- ging», American Behavioural Science, 60, 13, pp. 1575-89.
  28. S.W. Goodman (2015), «Conceptualizing and measuring citizenship and integration policy: Past lessons and new approaches», Comparative Political Studies, 48, 14, pp. 1905-41, DOI: 10.1177/0010414015592648
  29. J. Hainmueller, D. Hangartner, G. Pietrantuono (2017), «Catalyst or crown: Does naturalization promote the long-term social integration of immigrants?», American Political Science Re- view, 111, 2, pp. 256-76, DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000745
  30. T. Hammar (1990), Democracy and the nation state, Aldershot, Avebury.
  31. Y. Harpaz (2013), «Rooted Cosmopolitans: Israelis with a European Passport–History, Proper- ty, Identity», International Migration Review, 47, 1, pp. 166-206,
  32. C. Hawthorne (2021), L’Italia Meticcia? The Black Mediterranean and the Racial Carto- graphies of Citizenship, in The Black Mediterranean. Bodies, Borders and Citizenship, Cham, Springer-Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 169-98, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51391-7_9
  33. T. Huddleston, M. Vink (2015), «Full Membership or Equal Rights? The Link between Natu- ralisation and Integration Policies for Immigrants in 29 European States», Comparative Migration Studies, 3, 1, pp. 1-19,
  34. E.F. Isin (2017), Performative citizenship, in The Oxford handbook of citizenship, Oxford, Ox- ford University Press, pp. 499-523,
  35. E.F. Isin, G.M. Nielsen (2015), Introduction, in Acts of citizenship, London, Bloomsbury Aca- demic, DOI: 10.5040/9781350218048.0006
  36. H. Leitner, P. Ehrkamp (2006), «Transnationalism and migrants’ imaginings of citizenship»,
  37. Environment and Planning A, 38, 9, pp. 1615-32,
  38. T.H. Marshall (1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.A. McNevin (2020),«Time and the Figure of the Citizen», International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 33, 4, pp. 545-59,
  39. Ministero del Lavoro e delle politiche sociali (2020), La comunità peruviana in Italia. Rap- porto annuale sulla presenza dei migranti, -- https://www.lavoro.gov.it/documenti-e-norme/ studi-e-statistiche/Documents/Rapporti%20annuali%20sulle%20comunit%C3%A0%20 migranti%20in%20Italia%20-%20anno%202020/Per%C3%B9-rapporto-2020.pdf.
  40. P. Monforte, L. Bassel, K. Khan (2019), «Deserving citizenship? Exploring migrants’ expe- riences of the “citizenship tests” process in the United Kingdom», The British Journal of Sociology, 70, 1, pp. 24-43, DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12351
  41. D. Munro (2008), «Integration through participation: non-citizen resident voting rights in an era of globalization», Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l’inte- gration et de la migration internationale, 9, 1, pp. 63-80, e-book, -- http://www.neodemos.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/E-book-IUS-SOLI4.pdf.
  42. L. Orgad (2017), Naturalization, in The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, London, Bloomsbury Academic,
  43. K. Paerregaard (2008), Peruvians dispersed: a global ethnography of migration, Lanham, Le-xington Books.
  44. L. Pedroza (2013), «Policy framing and denizen enfranchisement in Portugal: why some mi- grant voters are more equal than others», Citizenship Studies, 17, 6-7, pp. 852-72, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2013.834140
  45. J. Rosbrook-Thompson (2015), «I’m local and foreign: Belonging, the city and the case for denizenship», Urban Studies, 52, 9, pp. 1615-30.
  46. M. Skey, M. Antonsich (eds.) (2017), Everyday nationhood: Theorising culture, identity and belonging after banal nationalism, New York, Springer.
  47. G. Tintori (2011), «The transnational political practices of “Latin American Italians”», International Migration, 49, 3, pp. 168-88,
  48. G. Tintori (2018), «Ius soli the Italian way. The long and winding road to reform the citizenship law»,ContemporaryItalianPolitics,10,4,pp.434-50, DOI: 10.1080/23248823.2018.1544360
  49. F. Van Houdt, S. Suvarierol, SW. Chinkel (2011), «Neoliberal communitarian citizenship: Cur- rent trends towards “earned citizenship” in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlan- ds», International Sociology, 26, 3, pp. 408-32.
  50. M. Vink (2015), Elusive citizenship, Maastricht University,
  51. M. Vink (2017), Comparing citizenship regimes, in The Oxford handbook of citizenship, Ox- ford, Oxford University Press, pp. 221-46,
  52. G. Zincone, M. Basili (2010), Country Report on Citizenship Law: Italy, Eudo Citizenship Obser- vatory, -- https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/19619/Italy2010.pdf?sequence=1.
  53. Z. Yanasmayan (2015), «Citizenship on paper or at heart? A closer look into the dual citizenship debate in Europe», Citizenship Studies, 19, 6-7, pp. 785-801, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2015.1053793

Stefania Yapo, Denizens o ritardatari? Il ritardo nelle naturalizzazioni come strumento di contestazione in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 128/2022, pp 122-137, DOI: 10.3280/SR2022-128007