The Integrative use of audio diaries in survey research for the detection of generative micro-events: a case study on the quality of life of university workers at Sapienza

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Author/s Alfredo Matrella
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2024/135
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 118-138 File size 277 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2024-135006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study explores the integration of survey research and audio diaries to investigate the quality of life among university staff, with particular attention to the effects – both positive and negative – of interference between different experiential domains (work, domestic/family, and leisure) on occupational distress. The research is situated within a growing interest in data collection methods that leverage digital technologies, such as the use of audio diaries recorded via instant messaging applications like WhatsApp or Telegram. These audio diaries allow participants to capture experiences and reflections in real-time, enhancing data authenticity and reducing intrusiveness compared to traditional diaries. This methodological approach enabled the identification of not only meaningful aspects of daily life but also micro-events that may trigger domain interference. Notably, the findings show that work tends to permeate daily routines, even when participants are engaged in activities associated with other life domains. Interestingly, leisure activities were found to have a dual effect: while they can reduce the pervasive influence of work, they may also contribute to a sense of overload in daily life.

  1. A.M. Alaszewski (2006), Using diaries for social research, London, Sage.
  2. N. Bolger, A. Davis, P. Rafaeli (2003), «Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived», Annual Review of Psychology, 54, pp. 579-616,
  3. U. Byrne (2005), «Work-life balance: Why are we talking about it at all?», Business Information Review, 22, 1, pp. 53-9, DOI: 10.1177/0266382105052268
  4. J. Capitano, M.S. DiRenzo, K.J. Aten, J.H. Greenhaus (2017), «Role identity salience and boundary permeability preferences: An examination of enactment and protection effects», Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, pp. 99-111,
  5. M. Cardano (2011), La ricerca qualitativa, Bologna, il Mulino, vol. 1.
  6. S.C. Clark (2000), «Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance», Human Relations, 53, 6, pp. 747-70, DOI: 10.1177/0018726700536001
  7. M.D. Cottingham, R.J. Erickson (2020), «Capturing emotion with audio diaries», Qualitative Research, 20, 5, pp. 549-64, DOI: 10.1177/1468794119885037
  8. J.W. Creswell, V.L. Plano Clark (2017), Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  9. K.J. Crooker, F.L. Smith, F. Tabak (2002), «Creating Work-Life Balance: A Model of Pluralism across Life Domains», Human Resource Development Review, 1, 4, pp. 387-419, DOI: 10.1177/1534484302238434
  10. A.P.M. Coxon (1999), «Parallel accounts? Discrepancies between self-report (diary) and recall (questionnaire) measures of the same sexual behavior», Aids Care, 11, pp. 221-34, DOI: 10.1080/09540129948108
  11. S.E. Crozier, C.M. Cassell (2016), «Methodological considerations in the use of audio diaries in work psychology: Adding to the qualitative toolkit», Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 2, pp. 396-419,
  12. O. Cucu-Oancea (2013), «Using diaries-a real challenge for the social scientist», ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 92, pp. 231-38,
  13. G. Di Franco (2016), I modelli di equazione strutturali: concetti, strumenti e applicazioni, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  14. J.R. Edwards, N.P. Rothbard (2000), «Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs», Academy of Management Review, 25, 1, pp. 178-99, DOI: 10.2307/259269
  15. J. Elster (2008), La volontà debole, Bologna, il Mulino.
  16. O. Giancola, E. Toscano (2017), Tra passione e sopravvivenza. Prospettive, condizioni e aspettative dei lavoratori della conoscenza negli atenei italiani, in F. Coin, A. Giorgi, A. Murgia (a c. di), Indisciplinate: Soggettività precarie nell’università italiana, Venezia, Edizioni Ca’Foscari.
  17. G. Gianturco (2018), L’intervista qualitativa. Dal discorso al testo scritto, Milano, Guerini Scientifica.
  18. B. E. Gibson, B. Mistry, B. Smith, K.K. Yoshida, D. Abbott, S. Lindsay, Y. Hamdani (2013), «The integrated use of audio diaries, photography, and interviews in research with disabled young men», International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 1, pp. 382-402.
  19. J. Hislop, S. Arber, R. Meadows, S. Venn (2005), «Narratives of the night: The use of audio diaries in researching sleep», Sociological Research Online, 10, 4, pp. 13-25,
  20. M. Jahoda, P.F. Lazarsfeld, H. Zeisel (1933), Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal, Leipzig, Hitzel; tr. it. I disoccupati di Marienthal, Roma, Edizioni Lavoro, 1986.
  21. M.H. Jarrahi, C. Goray, S. Zirker, Y. Zhang (2021), Using digital diaries as a research method for capturing practices, in G. Symon, K. Prichard, C. Hine (eds.), Research methods for digital work and organization: Investigating distributed, multi-modal, and mobile work, Oxford University Press,
  22. P.L. Kendall, K.M. Wolf (1949), The Analysis of Deviant Cases in Communication Research, in P.F. Lazarsfeld, F. Stanton (eds.), Communication Research 1948-49, New York, Harper and Bros.
  23. G. Kinman, F. Jones (2008), «Effort-Reward Imbalance and Overcommitment: Predicting Strain in Academic Employees in the United Kingdom”, International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 4, pp. 381-95,
  24. L. Lackman Zeman, S. Roy, P.P. Surnis, J.A. Wasserman, K. Duchak, R. Homayouni, E. Mulhem (2023), «Paradoxical experiences of healthcare workers during Covid-19: a qualitative analysis of anonymous, web-based, audio narratives», International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 18, 1, 2184034.
  25. P.F. Lazarsfeld, H. Menzel (1961), On the Relation between Individual and Collective Properties, in A. Etzioni (ed.), A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations, New York, Rinehart & Winston.
  26. V. Lo Presti (2020), L’uso del positive thinking nella ricerca valutativa, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  27. D. Lupton (2015), Sociologia digitale, Milano, Pearson.
  28. F. Marcatto, G. Sclip, L. Di Blas, D. Ferrante (2016), La misura dello stress e la valutazione soggettiva: un’indagine sul personale docente dell’Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Eut Edizioni Università di Trieste.
  29. A. Matrella (2024), «Quality of Life of Academic Actors. Career Trajectories and Working Conditions», Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 16, 2, pp. 19-46, DOI: 10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2024-2-2
  30. A. Matrella, M. Cavagnuolo (2023), From Marienthal to Digital Methods: Audio Diaries By Using Whatsapp in Social Research, in Resurgent Authoritarianism: Sociology of New Entanglements of Religions, Politics, and Economics, Melbourne, International Sociological Association in cooperazione con The Conference Exchange.
  31. S. Mauceri (2008), «Ri-scoprire l’analisi dei casi devianti: una strategia metodologica di supporto dei processi teorico-interpretativi nella ricerca sociale di tipo standard», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 29, 87, pp. 109-57, DOI: 10.3280/SR2008-087003
  32. S. Mauceri (2012), «Per una survey integrata e multilivello. Le lezioni dimenticate della Columbia School», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 33, 99, pp. 22-65, DOI: 10.3280/SR2012-099003
  33. S. Mauceri (2013), Arcipelago call center. Indagine sulla vita lavorativa degli operatori telefonici, Aprilia, Nova Logos.
  34. S. Mauceri (2016), «Integrating quality into quantity: survey research in the era of mixed methods», Qual Quant, 50, pp. 1213-31,
  35. S. Mauceri (2017), «L’avvento dell’era dei Mixed Methods. Nuovo paradigma o deadline di un dibattito?», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 38, 113, pp. 40-61, DOI: 10.3280/SR2017-113002
  36. S. Mauceri (2018), «Mixed survey research. La funzione delle tecniche qualitative nella ricerca standard», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 39, 116, pp. 90-102, DOI: 10.3280/SR2018116008
  37. S. Mauceri (2019), Qualità nella quantità. La survey research nell’era dei Mixed Methods, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  38. F. Mochi, N. Madjar (2018), Interruptions and multitasking: Advantages and disadvantages for creativity at work, in Individual creativity in the workplace, Cambridge, Academic Press, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00005-X
  39. V. Moretti (2022), Dear (Digital) Diary: Evaluating the Audio Diary Technique as a Research Method, in Handbook of Research on Advanced Research Methodologies for a Digital Society, Hershey, Igi Global,
  40. V. Moretti, R. Pronzato (2024), «The emotional ambiguities of healthcare professionals’ platform experiences», Social Science & Medicine, 357, 117185.
  41. J. Mudrak, K. Zabrodska, P. Kveton, M. Jelinek, M. Blatny, I. Solcova, K. Machovcova (2018),
  42. «Occupational Well-Being among University Faculty: A Job Demands-Resources Model»,
  43. Research in Higher Education, 59, 3, pp. 325-48,
  44. K. O’Reilly, S. Ramanaik, W.T. Story, N.A. Gnanaselvam, K.K. Baker, L.T. Cunningham,
  45. A. Mukherjee, A. Pujar (2022), «Audio diaries: a novel method for water, sanitation, and hygiene-related maternal stress research», International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, pp. 2-3,
  46. S. Porter (2000), Qualitative research, in D.F.S. Cormack (ed.), The Research Process in Nursing, Oxford, Blackwell Science, 4th ed.
  47. L. Pujol-Cols, M. Lazzaro-Salazar (2018), «Psychosocial Risks and Job Satisfaction in Argentinian Scholars: Exploring the Moderating Role of Work Engagement», Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34, 3, pp. 145-56,
  48. G. Punziano (2012), Mixed methods as mirror of social research, in C. Cipolla, A. De Lillo, E. Ruspini (a c. di), Il sociologo, le sirene e le pratiche di integrazione, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  49. G. Punziano, E. Amaturo (2018), «La survey nelle strategie di indagine mixed methods”, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 29, 116, pp. 75-89, DOI: 10.3280/SR2018-116007
  50. G.M. Reevy, G. Deason (2014), «Predictors of Depression, Stress, and Anxiety among Non-Te-nure Track Faculty», Frontiers in Psychology, 5, art. 701, D. Reuschke (2019), «The subjective well-being of homeworkers across life domains», Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51, 6, pp. 1326-49, DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19842583
  51. J.A. Sell (2023), «Contextual factors associated with the morale of academic and support staff in universities», Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 27, 2, pp. 41-50, DOI: 10.1080/13603108.2023.2167016
  52. R. Semeraro (2011), «L’analisi qualitativa dei dati di ricerca in educazione», Italian Journal of Educational Research, 7, pp. 97-106.
  53. L.R. Sharma, S. Bidari, D. Bidari, S. Neupane, R. Sapkota (2023), «Exploring the mixed methods research design: types, purposes, strengths, challenges, and criticisms», Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5, 1, pp. 3-12,
  54. M.J. Sirgy, R.N. Widgery, D.J. Lee, G.B. Yu (2010), «Developing a measure of community well-being based on perceptions of impact in various life domains», Social Indicators Research, 96, pp. 295-311,
  55. J. Stolz (2016), «Opening the black box. How the study of social mechanisms can benefit from the use of explanatory mixed methods», Analyse & Kritik, 38, 1, pp. 257-86, DOI: 10.1177/15586898241253892
  56. K. Van Es, M. Wieringa, M.T. Schäfer (2018), Tool criticism: From digital methods to digital methodology, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Studies, New York, sociation for Computing Machinery.
  57. C. Warhurst, A. Knox (2022), «Manifesto for a new Quality of Working Life», Human Relations, 75, 2, pp. 304-321, DOI: 10.1177/0018726720979348
  58. I. Williamson, D. Leeming, S. Lyttle, S. Johnson (2015), «Evaluating the audio-diary method in qualitative research», Qualitative Research Journal, 15, 1, pp. 1-28, DOI: 10.1108/QRJ04-2014-0014
  59. T. Winefield, C. Boyd, J. Saebel, S. Pignata (2008), «Update on National University Stress Study», Australian Universities’ Review, 50, 1, pp. 20-9,
  60. V. Wöhrer (2014), «Introduction: early career researchers and changing working conditions in academia», Higher Education Policy, 27, 4, pp. 431-4,
  61. S. Wray, G. Kinman (2022), «The psychosocial hazards of academic work: an analysis of trends», Studies in Higher Education, 47, 4, pp. 771-82, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1793934
  62. C. Wu (2009), «Enhancing quality of life by shifting importance perception among life domains», J. Happiness Stud., 10, pp. 37-47,
  63. S. Wright (1920), «The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6, pp. 320-32.
  64. S. Wright (1921), «Correlation and causation», Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, pp. 557-85.

Alfredo Matrella, L’uso integrativo degli audio-diari nella survey research per la rilevazione dei micro-eventi generativi. Il caso di studio sulla qualità della vita dei lavoratori universitari della Sapienza in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 135/2024, pp 118-138, DOI: 10.3280/SR2024-135006