«Omnis res, eo quod est, singularis est». Pietro Aureoli sulla composizione metafisica dell’ente singolare

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Chiara Paladini
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/4
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 569-593 Dimensione file 90 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2018-004002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Peter Auriol was one of the most influential authors of the generation after Scotus. He developed an anti-realist ontology (he denied the extra-mental existence of common natures and consequently the necessity of a principle of individuation) and a new epistemology. In his view, the mental world is somehow richer than the extra-mental one, since our mind can abstract general notions (such as humanitas) that are not matched by general objects in reality. The article is aimed to show how, according to Auriol, the individual things existing outside are the grounds on which all our notions (even the general and abstract ones) are based. Accordingly, the first section analyzes the internal composition of the individual things: material suppositum and singular form, which are interrelated as potency and act. The second section deals with Auriol’s theory of knowledge. In particular, it focuses on the relation between our notions, both concrete and abstract, and the metaphysical parts of extra-mental individuals. The general, abstract notions originate from the formal parts (the singular substantial form) of extra-mental individuals, while the concrete notions from the whole individuals.

Parole chiave:Peter Auriol, Singular Being, Methaphysical Composition, Abstract Concepts, Concrete Concepts, Ontology

  1. - Amerini 2009: Fabrizio Amerini, Realism and Intentionality: Hervaeus Natalis, Peter Aureoli, and William Ockham in Discussion, in Stephen F. Brown/Thomas Dewender/Theo Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century, Brill, Leiden 2009, pp. 239-260.
  2. - Amerini 2014: Fabrizio Amerini, Peter Auriol on Categories, in «Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale» 25 (2014), pp. 493-535.
  3. - Bérubé 1964: Camille Bérubé O.F.M., La connaissance de l’individuel au Moyen Âge (= Université de Montréal, Institut d’Etudes médiévales), Presses de l’Université de Montreal/Presses universitaires de France, Paris 1964.
  4. - Biard 2001: Joël Biard, Intention et présence. La notion de presentialitas au XIVe siècle, in Dominik Perler (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (= Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 76), Brill, Leiden-Boston-Köln 2001, pp. 265-282.
  5. - Bolyard 2015: Charles Bolyard, Truth and Certainty in Peter Auriol, in «Vivarium» 53.1 (2015), pp. 45-64.
  6. - Boulnois 1991: Olivier Boulnois, Genèse de la théorie scotiste de l’individuation, in Annie Bitbol-Hespériès (et al.) (ed.), Le problème de l’individuation (= Problemes et controverses),Vrin, Paris 1991, pp. 51-77.
  7. - Boulnois 2014: Olivier Boulnois, Lire le Principe d’individuation de Duns Scot, Vrin, Paris 2014.
  8. - Clatterbaugh 1972: Kenneth C. Clatterbaugh, Individuation in the Ontology of Duns Scotus, in «Franciscan Studies» 32 (1972), pp. 65-73.
  9. - Conti 2001: Alessandro D. Conti, Alcune note su individuazione e struttura metafisica della sostanza prima in Duns Scoto, in «Antonianum» 76 (2001), pp. 111-144.
  10. - Cross 2014: Richard Cross, Medieval Theories of Haecceity, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), -- URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/medieval-haecceity/>.
  11. - Cross 2003: Richard Cross, Divisibility, Communicability, and Predicability in Duns Scotus’s Theories of the Common Nature, in «Medieval Philosophy and Theology» 11 (2003), pp. 43–63.
  12. - Davenport 2006: Anne Davenport, Esse Egressus and Esse Apparens in Peter Auriol’s Theory of Intentional Being, in «Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum» 35 (2006), pp. 60-84.
  13. - Dreiling 1913: Raymundus Dreiling, Der Konzeptualismus in der Universalienlehre des Franziskanererzbischofs Petrus Aureoli (Pierre d’Auriole) nebst biographisch-bibliographischer Einleitung (= Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 11,6), Aschendorff, Münster 1913.
  14. - Duba/Schabel 2017: William Duba/Chris Schabel, Remigio, Auriol, Scotus, and the Myth of the Two-Year Sentences Lecture at Paris, in «Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales» 84.1 (2017), 143-179.
  15. - Dumont 1995: Stephen D. Dumont, The Question on Individuation in Scotus’s “Quaestiones super Metaphysicam”, in Leonardo Sileo (ed.), Via Scoti. Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti, Atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale, vol. I (Medioevo I), Ed. Antonianum, Roma 1995, pp. 193-227.
  16. - Friedman 1997: Russell L.Friedman, Conceiving and Modifying Reality: Some Modist Roots of Peter Auriol’s Theory of Concept Formation, in Costantino Marmo (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIXIV Century), Brepols, Turnhout 1997, pp. 305-321.
  17. - Friedman 1999: Russell L. Friedman, Peter Auriol on Intentions and Essential Predication, in Sten Ebbesen/Russell L. Friedman (ed.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition, The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen 1999, pp. 415-430. - Friedman 2000: Russell Friedman, Peter Auriol on intellectual cognition of singulars, in «Vivarium» 38.1 (2000), 177-193.
  18. - Friedman 2015: Russell L. Friedman, Act, Species, and Appearance: Peter Auriol on Intellectual Cognition and Consciousness in Gyula Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, New York 2015, pp. 141-165.
  19. - Friedman 2016: Russell L. Friedman, Peter Auriol, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), -- URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/auriol/.
  20. - Galluzzo 2004: Gabriele Galluzzo, Aquinas on Common Nature and Universals, «Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales» 71/1 (2004), pp. 131-171.
  21. - Galluzzo 2011: Gabriele Galluzzo, Two Senses of ‘Common’. Avicenna’s Doctrine of Essence and Aquinas’s View on Individuation, in Amos Bertolacci (ed.), The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s “Metaphysics”, De Gruyter, Berlin 2011, pp. 309-377.
  22. - Gaus 2008: Caroline Gaus, Etiam realis scientia. Petrus Aureolis konzeptualistische Transzendentalienlehre vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kritik am Formalitätenrealismus, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2008.
  23. - Henricus a Gandavo 1613: Henricus a Gandavo, Quodlibet V, Henrici a Gandavo Aurea quodlibeta cum commentariis Vitalis Zuccolii I, Venetiis 1613.
  24. - Hoffmann 2015: Tobias Hoffman, Peter Auriol on Free Choice and Free Judgment, in «Vivarium» 53 (2015), 65-89.
  25. - Ioannes Duns Scotus 1973: Ioannes Duns Scotus, Ordinatio II, dist. 1-3, ed. Balic et alii (= Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera Omnia 7), Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, Civitas Vaticana 1973.
  26. - Ioannes Duns Scotus 1982: Ioannes Duns Scotus, Lectura II, dist. 1-6, ed. Modric et alii (= Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera Omnia 18), Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, Civitas Vaticana 1982.
  27. - King 1992: Peter King, Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and the Individual Differentia, in «Philosophical Topics» 20 (1992), pp. 50-76.
  28. - King 2000: Peter King, The Problem of Individuation in the Middle Ages, in «Theoria » 66 (2000), pp. 159-184.
  29. - Klinger 1964: Ingbert Klinger, Das Prinzip der Individuation bei Thomas von Aquin: Versuch einer Interpretation und Vergleich mit zwei umstrittenen Opuscula (= Münsterschwarzacher Studien 2), Vier-Türme-Verlag, Münsterschwarzach 1964.
  30. - Kraus 1927: Johan Baptist Kraus, Die Lehre des Johannes Duns Skotus O.F.M. von der natura communis. Ein Beitrag zum Universalienproblem in der Scholastik [Diss. Freiburg (Schweiz)], Bonifacius-Druckerei, Freiburg-Paderborn-Paris 1927.
  31. - Mackey 1979: Louis H. Mackey, Singular and Universal: a Franciscan Perspective, in «Franciscan Studies» 39 (1979), pp. 130-164.
  32. - Maier 1946: Anneliese Maier, Das Problem der quantitas materiae in der Scholastik, in «Gregorianum» 27 (1946), pp. 89-109, rist. in Anneliese Maier, Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert cap. I.2, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, Roma 1966, pp. 26-52.
  33. - Mensching 1996: Günther Mensching, Zur Neuentdeckung des Individuationsprinzips im 13. Jahrhundert und seinen Antinomien bei Thomas von Aquin und Johannes Duns Scotus, in Jan A. Aertsen/Andreas Speer (ed.), Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter (= Miscellanea mediaevalia 24), De Gruyter, Berlin-New York 1996, pp. 287-302.
  34. - Michalski 1924: Konstanty Michalski, Les sources du criticisme et scepticisme dans la philosophie du XIVe siècle. Extrait de La Pologne au Congrès international de Bruxelles, Imprimerie de l’Université, Cracovie 1924; rist. In La philosophie au XIVe siècle. Six études, herausgegeben und eingeleitet von Kurt Flasch (= Opuscula philosophica. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte 1), Minerva, Frankfurt am Main 1969, pp. 35-65.
  35. - Nicola di Autrecourt 1994: Nicola di Autrecourt, Correspondence I.2, Ed. De Rijk 1994.
  36. - Nielsen 2003: Lauge Olaf Nielsen, Peter Auriol, in Jorge J. E. Gracia/Timothy Noone (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Blackwell, 2003), pp. 494-503.
  37. - Noon 2003: Timothy Noon, Universals and Individuation, in Thomas Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003, pp. 100-128.
  38. - Owens 1988: Joseph Owens, Thomas Aquinas: Dimensive Quantity as Individuating Principle, in «Mediaeval Studies» 50 (1988), pp. 279-310.
  39. - Owens 1994: Joseph Owens, Thomas Aquinas (b. ca. 1225; d. 1274), in Jorge J. E.
  40. Gracía (ed.), Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150-1650, State University of New York Press, Albany (NY) 1994, pp. 173-194.
  41. - O’ Meara 1965: William O’ Meara, Actual Existence and the Individual according to Duns Scotus, in «The Monist» 49 (1965), pp. 659-669.
  42. - Perler 1994: What Am I Thinking About? John Duns Scotus and Peter Aureol on Intentional Objects, in «Vivarium» 32 (1994), pp. 72-87.
  43. - Perler/Rudolph 2000: Dominik Perler/Ulrich Rudolph, Occasionalismus. Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäischen Denken, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2000.
  44. - Perler 2002: Dominik Perler, Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter (= Philosophische Abhandlungen 82), Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 2002.
  45. - Petagine 2017: Antonio Petagine, La doctrine du lieu chez Pierre d’Auriole, in Tiziana Suarez-Nani/Olivier Ribordy/Antonio Petagine (eds.), Lieu, espace, mouvement: Physique, Métaphysique et Cosmologie (xiie-xvie siècles): Actes du colloque international Université de Fribourg (Suisse), 12-14 mars 2015 (= Textes et Etudes du Moyen Âge 86), Brepols, Turnhout 2017, pp. 109-123.
  46. - Petrus Aureoli 1952-1956: Petrus Aureoli, Scriptum super primum Sententiarum, voll. I-II, Eligius Buytaert (ed.), Franciscan Institute Press, St Bonaventure (NY) 1952-1956.
  47. - Petrus Aureoli 1605: Petri Aureoli Commentariorum in secundum, tertium, quartum libros Sententiarum pars secunda (Reportationes in II, III, IV Sent.), Ex Typographia Aloysij Zannetti, Romae 1605.
  48. - Petrus Aureoli 2004: Petrus Aureoli, E-Scriptum (Text Version 1 of April 1, 2004), Christopher Schabel (ed.), -- URL = http://www.peterauriol.net/editions/electronicscriptum/contents/.
  49. - Pickavé 2007: Martin Pickavé, The Controversy Over The Principle Of Individuation, in Christopher Schabel (ed.), Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century, vol. 7, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2007, pp. 17-80.
  50. - Pini 2012: Giorgio Pini, The Individuation of Angels from Bonaventure to Duns Scotus, in Tobias Hoffmann (ed.), A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2012, pp. 79-115. - Porphyrius 1966: Porphyrii Isagoge. Translatio Boethii (= Aristoteles Latinus I, 6-7), Laurentius Minio-Paluello (ed.), Desclée de Brouwer, Bruges-Paris1966.
  51. - Prezioso 1950: Faustino A. Prezioso, La teoria dell’essere apparente nella gnoseologia di Pietro Aureoli, in «Studi Francescani» 46 (1950), pp. 15-43.
  52. - Prezioso 1963: Faustino A. Prezioso, La species medievale e i prodromi del fenomenismo moderno (= Serie filosofica. Saggi e monografie 42), CEDAM, Padova 1963.
  53. - Prezioso 1978: Faustino A. Prezioso, Ricerche sulla gnoseologia medievale, in «Antonianum » 53/3-4 (1978), pp. 641-646.
  54. - Reina 2002: Maria Elena Reina, Hoc hic et nunc. Buridano, Marsilio di Inghen e la conoscenza del singolare, Olschki, Firenze 2002.
  55. - Roland-Gosselin 1948: Marie D. Roland-Gosselin, Le De ente et essentia de S. Thomas d’Aquin, Vrin, Paris 1948.
  56. Rudavsky 1977/1980: Tamar Rudavsky, The Doctrine of Individuation in Duns Scotus, in «Franziskanische Studien» 59 (1977), pp. 320-377; 62 (1980), pp. 62-83.
  57. - Suarez-Nani 2009: Tiziana Suarez-Nani, Singularité et individualité selon Pierre Auriol, in Stephen F. Brown, Thomas Dewender, and Theo Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2009, pp. 339-357.
  58. - Tachau 1988: Katherine H. Tachau, Vision and Certitude in the age of Ockham. Optics, Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250-1345 (= Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelaters 22), Brill, Leiden-New York-København-Köln 1988.
  59. - Tachau 1999: Katherine H. Tachau, Some Aspects of the Notion of Intentional Existence at Paris, 1250-1320, in Sten Ebbesen/Russell L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition, The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen 1999, pp. 331-353.
  60. - Vanni Rovighi 1960: Sofia Vanni Rovighi, L’intenzionalità della conoscenza secondo P. Aureolo, in L’homme et so destin d’après les penseur du Moyen Âge. Actes du premier Congrès International de Philosophie médiévale. Louvain, Bruxelles, 28 août–4 septembre 1958,Èditions du Louvain, Louvain 1960, pp. 673-680.
  61. - Vanni Rovighi 1978: Sofia Vanni Rovighi, Una fonte remota della teoria husserliana dell’intenzionalità, in Studi di filosofia medievale II. Secoli XIII e XIV, Pubblicazioni della Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Milano 1978, pp. 283-298.
  62. - Walter Chatton 1989: Chatton, Reportatio et Lectura super Sententias: Collatio ad Librum Primum et Prologus. Ed. Joseph C. Wey, CSB (= Studies and Texts 90), Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto 1989.
  63. - Wippel 2000: John F. Wippel, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being, CUA Press, Washington 2000.
  64. - Wolter 1994: Allan B. Wolter John Duns Scotus, in Jorge J.E. Gracia (ed.), Individuation in Scholasticism. The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150-1650, SUNY Press, Albany (NY) 1994, pp. 271-298.
  65. - Wöller 2015: Florian Wöller, Theologie und Wissenschaft bei Petrus Aureoli. Ein scholastischer Entwurf aus dem frühen 14. Jahrhundert, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2015 (parte 1, pp. 33-94).

Chiara Paladini, «Omnis res, eo quod est, singularis est». Pietro Aureoli sulla composizione metafisica dell’ente singolare in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2018, pp 569-593, DOI: 10.3280/SF2018-004002