Social innovation and metagovernance of welfare policies

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Giovanni Bertin, Marion Ellison
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 17 P. 40-56 Dimensione file 221 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2019-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The birth of welfare states in Europe was accompanied by the adoption of governance models typical of public planning. The crisis of welfare state and the development of welfare mix have evidenced the difficult to govern the complexity of new welfare systems. The co-presence of multiple actors with different organizational cultures and identities has drawn attention to the criticalities affecting the hierarchical approach and has given rise to the development of differ-ent forms of co-regulation involving the co-presence of approaches considered as alternatives to each other such as hierarchy, competition, and co-operation. In Europe have been developed some new governance hybrid approaches. The Scottish Community Strategic Planning is an interesting example of this social innovation of local governance practices.

Parole chiave:Metagovernance; hybrid governance; co-production; community planning; network governance; social innovation.

  1. Aliu A., Parlak B., Aliu D. (2015). Hybrid structures: innovative governance, judicial and sociological approaches. Quality & Quantity, 49(4): 1747-1760.
  2. Alston P. (2018). Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. UN -- https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/poverty/pages/srextremepovertyindex.aspx
  3. Bertin G. (2009). La governance ibrida. Studi di sociologia, 47(3): 249-280. DOI: 10.1400/17586
  4. Bertin G., Carradore M. (2016). Differentiation of welfare regimes: the case of Italy. International Journal of Social Welfare, 25(2): 149-160.
  5. Bertin G., Pantalone M. (2018). Comparing Hybrid welfare systems: The differentiation of health and social care policies at the regional level in Italy. Italian Sociological Review, 8(1): 1-23.
  6. Christie C. (2011). Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services. Scottish Government. – Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2011/06/27154527/18 (15/10/2018).
  7. Ellison M., Fenger M. (2013). Social Investment, Protection and Inequality within the New Economy and Politics of Welfare in Europe. Social Policy and Society, 12(4): 611-624. DOI: 10.1017/S147474641300027
  8. Escobar O., Gibb K., Eltanani M.K, Weakley S. (2018). Community Planning Officials Survey: Understanding the everyday work of local participatory governance in Scotland. What Works Scotland. -- Testo accessibile al sito: http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/publications/community-planning-officials-survey-everyday-work-of-local-participatory-governance/ (02/03/2019).
  9. Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  10. Evers A. (2004). Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organisations –Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services, Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference of the International Society for Third-Sector Research Ryerson University and York University Toronto, Canada
  11. Fernie K., McCarthy J. (2001). Partnership and Community Involvement: Institutional Morphing in Dundee. Local Economy, 16(4): 299-311. DOI: 10.1080/0269094011007987
  12. Foucault M. (1991). Governmentality. In: Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P., editors, The Foucault effect. Studies of governmentality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  13. Foucault M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Franz M., Güles O., Prey G. (2008). Place-making and ‘Green’ Reuses of Brownfields in the Ruhr. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3): 316-328.
  15. Gieryn T. (2000). A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 463-496.
  16. Gramsci A. (1975). Quaderni del carcere. Torino: Einaudi.
  17. Grenados Sanchez J., Escrigas C. (2014). The challenges of knowledge in a knowledge democracy. In: Escrigas C. et al, editors, Higher Education in the World. Knowledge, engagement and Higher Education: Contributing to social change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Haber H. (2015). Regulation as social policy: home evictions and repossessions in the UK and Sweden. Public Administration, 93(3): 806-821.
  19. Haber H. (2017). Rise of the regulatory welfare state? Social regulation in utilities in Israel. Social Policy & Administration, 51(3): 442-463.
  20. Hall B., Tandon R., Tremblay C., Singh W. (2015). Challenges in the Co-construction of Knowledge: A Global Study for Strengthening Structures for Community University Research Partnership. Testo disponibile al sito: http://unescochair-cbrsr.org/unesco/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Hall.pdf (20/05/2017). 
  21. Hemerijck A. (2013). Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Henderson J., Revell P., Escobar O. (2018). Transforming communities? Exploring the roles of community anchor organisations in public service reform, local democracy, community resilience and social change. What Works Scotland. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/WWSExploringTheRolesOfCommunityAnchorOrganisationsInPublicServiceReform.pdf (02/03/2019).
  23. Liguori M. (2016). Noi perspective ale filosofiei politice a lui Croce, Gentile şi Gramsci. Polis, IV, 2(12): 13-28.
  24. Little A. (2002). The Politics of Community: Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  25. Nederhand J., Bekkers V., Voorberg W. (2016). Self-Organization and the Role of Government: How and why does self-organization evolve in the shadow of hierarchy? Public Management Review, 18(7): 1063-1084. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.106641
  26. Osborne D., Gaebler T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  27. Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  28. Powell M. (2015). A re-specification of the welfare state: conceptual issues in the three worlds of welfare capitalism. Social Policy and Society, 14(2): 247-268. DOI: 10.1017/S147474641400052
  29. Rees J., Mullins D., Bovaird T. (2012). Third Sector Research Centre. Research Report (88). Partnership working. TSRC Publications. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-88.pdf (02/03/2019).
  30. Scottish Government (2011a). Renewing Scotland’s Social Democracy, Priorities for reform in response to the Christie Commission. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  31. Scottish Government (2011b). Renewing Scotland’s Public Services - Priorities for reform in response to the Christie Commission. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  32. Scottish Government (2016). Scottish Open Government National Action Plan: 2016-2017. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  33. Scottish Government (2018). Monitoring the outcomes of planning A Research Study. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  34. Seibel W. (2015). Welfare Mixes and Hybridity: Analytical and Managerial Implications. Voluntas, 26(5) :1759-1768.
  35. Sorensen E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1): 98-114. DOI: 10.1177/027507400528258
  36. Sorensen E., Torfing J. (2009). Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2): 234-258.
  37. Steurer R. (2013). Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Science, 46(4): 387-410.
  38. Torfing J., Guy Peters B., Pierre J., Sorensen E. (2012). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  39. Voorberg W.H., Bekkers V.J.J.M., Tummers L.G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333-1357. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.93050

  • Social investment e innovazione sociale: il welfare europeo di fronte a una svolta? Maurizio Busacca, in SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE 129/2023 pp.33
    DOI: 10.3280/SR2022-129002

Giovanni Bertin, Marion Ellison, Social innovation and metagovernance of welfare policies in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2019, pp 40-56, DOI: 10.3280/SES2019-002005