I nuovi scenari della filiazione e della genitorialità

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Paola Ronfani
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 17 P. 76-92 Dimensione file 217 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2020-001005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In contemporary Western societies, family is characterized by the differentiation of family configurations and relationships, and by the centrality of parental responsibility. These transformations, together with the development of medically-assisted reproduction techniques, in particular those requiring gamete donations, have strongly weakened the traditional marriage-centric, heteronormative and binary conception of parenting and parenthood. Blended families and, above all, homoparental families, which unequivocally highlight the centrality of intentional parenting, are a touchstone for all the issues today arising around the legal regulation of parenthood. In this article we will try to give an account of these complex issues, and of the path that a growing number of countries is accomplishing to recognize the rights and duties of all those who, in different family forms, perform care and responsibility functions.

Parole chiave:New family forms- Parenting and Parenthood - Artificial Reproductive Technologies - Homoparental families - Legal Regulation of Adults-Children Relationships

  1. Alkorta Idiakez, Itziar, & Esther Farnós Amorós, 2017. Anonimato del donante y derecho a conocer: un difícil equilibrio. Oñati Socio-legal Series, 7: 148-178.
  2. Bauman, Zigmunt, [2003]2006. Liquid Love. On the Frailty of Human Bond. Traduzione italiana Amore liquido. Sulla fragilità dei legami affettivi. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.
  3. Berman, Sheldon, 1997. Children’s Social Consciousness and the Development of Social Responsibility. New York: State University of New York Press.
  4. Borillo, Daniel, 2009. La vérité biologique contre l’homoparentalité. Le statut du beau-parent ou le PaCS de la filiation. Droit et Société, 72: 361-70.
  5. Bosisio, Roberta, 2015. Le famiglie omogenitoriali nelle ricerche empiriche. In Roberta Bosisio & Paola Ronfani, Le famiglie omogenitoriali. Responsabilità, regole e diritti. Roma: Carocci editore.
  6. Brunet, Laurence, & Jehanne Sosson, 2013. L’engendrement à plusieurs en droit comparé: quand le droit peine à distinguer filiation, origine et parentalité. In Hugues Fulchiron & Jehanne Sosson (dir.), Parenté, filiation, origines. Le droit et l’engendrement à plusieurs. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
  7. Büchler, Andrea, 2016. The Right to Respect for Private and Family Life. In Andrea Büchler & Helen Keller (eds.), Family Form and Parenthood. Theory and Practice of Article 8 ECHR in Europe. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  8. Cadolle, Silvie, 2007. Allons-nous vers une pluriparentalité? L’exemple des configurations familiales recomposées. Recherches familiales, 4: 13-24.
  9. Cadoret, Anne, 2006. La filiation et l’aide médical à la procréation. Droit et Cultures, 51: 179-185.
  10. Cammu, Nola, 2017. How Should We Name the Parents? The Challenges of Plus-Two-Parents Families for Legal Kinship Terminology. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31: 326-343.
  11. Carbone, June, 2000. From Partners to Parents. The Second Revolution in Family Law. New York: Columbia University Press.
  12. Courdurières, Jérôme, & Cathy Herbrand, 2014. Genre, parenté et techniques de reproduction assistée: bilan et perspectives après 30 ans de recherche. Enfances, Familles, Générations, 21, -- http://journals.openediction.org/efg/493 (visitato il 23 gennaio 2019).
  13. d’Angelo, Angela, 2014. Re-thinking Family Law: A New Legal Paradigm for Stepfamilies. In Katharina Boele-Woelky, Nina Dethloff & Wener Gephart (eds.). Family Law and Culture in Europe. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  14. de Campos, Thana, & Caterina Milo, 2018. Mitochondrial Donations and the Right to Know and Trace One’s Genetic Origins: An Ethical and Legal Challenge. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 32: 170-183.
  15. de Singly, François, 1996. Le Soi, le Couple et la Famille. Paris: Nathan.
  16. —, 2018. Le singulier et le pluriel de la famille. In Michel Wieviorka (dir.), La famille dans tous ses états. Auxerre: Éditions Sciences Humaines.
  17. Delaisi de Parseval, Geneviève, & Chantal Collard, 2007. La gestation pour autrui. Un bricolage des représentations de la paternité et de la maternité euro-américaines. L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie, 183: 29-53.
  18. Dos Reis, Edihno, Gaëlle Ruffieux, Julie Terel & Geoffrey Willems, 2013. La maternité de substitution. In Hugues Fulchiron & Jehanne Sosson (dir.), Parenté, filiation, origines. Le droit et l’engendrement à plusieurs. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
  19. Fisher, Berenice, & Joan Tronto, 1990. Towards a Feminist Theory of Care. In Emily Abel & Margaret Nelson (eds.), Circles of Care. Work and Identity in Women’s Life. Albany: University of New York Press.
  20. Fulchiron, Hugues, & Jehanne Sosson (dir.), 2013. Parenté, filiation, origines. Le droit et l’engendrement à plusieurs. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
  21. Giddens, Anthony, [1992]2008. The Transformationn of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Erotism in Modern Society. Traduzione italiana Le trasformazioni dell’intimità. Sessualità, amore ed erotismo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  22. Gilman, Leah, & Petra Nordqvist, 2018. Organizing Openness: How UK Policy Defines the Significance of Information and Information Sharing about Gamete Donation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 3: 316-333.
  23. Godelier, Maurice, 2004. Métamorphoses de la parenté. Paris: Fayard.
  24. Grilli, Simonetta, & Rosa Parisi, 2016. New Family Relationships: Between Bio-genetic and Kinship Rarefaction Scenarios. Antropologia, 1: 29-51.
  25. Gross, Martine, 2015. L’homoparentalité et la transparentalité au prisme des sciences sociales: révolution ou pluralisation des formes de parenté?. Enfances Familles Générations, 23. -- http://journals.openediction.org/efg/287 (visitato il 31 gennaio 2019).
  26. —, 2017. L’accès des couples de femmes à la procréation médicalement assistée: question de filiation. Droit et Cultures, 73: 111-123.
  27. Herbrand, Cathy, 2012. La filiation à l’épreuve de la présomption de “paternité” pour les couples du même sexe: questionnement et perspectives à partir du cas belge. Droit et Société, 3: 689-712.
  28. Héritier, Françoise, 1985. La cuisse de Jupiter. Réflexion sur les nouveaux modes de procréation. L’Homme, 94: 5-22.
  29. Inhorn, Marcia C., 2003. Global Infertility and the Globalization of New Reproduction Technologies: Illustration from Egypt. Social Science & Medicine, 56: 1831-1851.
  30. Jacobs, Melanie, 2007. Why Just Two? Disaggregating Traditional Parental Rights and Responsibility to Recognize Multiple Parents. Journal of Law & Family Studies, 9: 309-39.
  31. Jacub, Marcela, 2004. L’empire du ventre. Paris: Fayard.
  32. Leckey, Robert, 2014. Infiniment plus de choses dans la vie que dans la loi: la reconnaissance des mères lesbiennes. Droit et Société, 1: 115-132.
  33. Long, Joëlle, & Manuela Naldini, 2015. Turismo matrimoniale e procreativo: alcune riflessioni socio-giuridiche. GENIUS, 2: 163-171.
  34. Lyons, Donna, 2018. Domestic Implementation of the Donor-Conceived Child’s Right to Identity in Light of the Requirement of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 32: 1-26.
  35. McKinnon, Susan, 2015. Productive Paradoxes of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Context of the New Kinship Studies. Journal of Family Issues, 36: 461-479. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X14563799
  36. Morgan, David, 2011. Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Nicolas-Maguin, Marie-France, 2011. Premières réflexions sur le pluralisme familial. In Odile Roy (dir.), Réflexions sur le pluralisme familial. Nanterre: Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre, -- http://books.openedition.org/pupo/671 (visitato il 18 giugno 2018).
  38. Norqvist, Petra, 2014. Bringing Kinship into Being: Connectedness, Donor Conception and Lesbian Parenthood. Sociology, 48: 268-283. DOI: 10.1177/0038038513477936
  39. Ouedraogo, Richard, 2017. Saisir les enjeux de la maternité de substitution sous le prisme de la théorie générale du contrat: quelles perspectives en France et au Québec? Droit et Cultures, 73: 91-109.
  40. Rodotà, Stefano, 2015. Diritto d’amore. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.
  41. Ronfani, Paola, 2015. La responsabilità genitoriale. Il diritto, la cultura giuridica e i saperi esperti. In Roberta Bosisio & Paola Ronfani, Le famiglie omogenitoriali. Responsabilità, regole e diritti. Roma: Carocci editore.
  42. Sevenhuijsen, Selma, 1998. Citizenship and the Ethic of Care. Abingdon: Routledge.
  43. Shúilleabháin, Máire Ní, 2019. Surrogacy, System Shopping, and Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family, 33: 104-122.
  44. Singer, Anna, 2014. The Right of the Child to Parents. In Katharina Boele-Woelky, Nina Dethloff & Wener Gephart (eds.). Family Law and Culture in Europe. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  45. Smart, Carol, & Bren Neale, 1999. Family Fragments. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  46. Strathern, Marylin. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproduction Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  47. Théry, Irène, 1993. Le démariage. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  48. —, 2010. Des humaines comme les autres. Bioéthique, anonymat et genre du don. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
  49. —, (dir.), 2013a. Mariage de même sexe et filiation. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
  50. —, 2013b. L’anonymat des dons d’engendrement est-il vraiment “éthique”? La Revue des droits de l’homme, 3, http://journals.org.revdh/193 (visitato il 20 gennaio 2019).
  51. —, 2016. Mariage et filiation pour tous. Une métamorphose inachevée. Paris: Seuil.
  52. —, & Anne-Marie Leroyer, 2014. Filiation, origines, parentalité. Le droit face aux nouvelles valeurs de responsabilité générationnelle. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  53. Wieviorka, Michel, 2018. Introduction. In Michel Wieviorka (dir.), La famille dans tous ses états. Auxerre: Éditions Sciences Humaines.

Paola Ronfani, I nuovi scenari della filiazione e della genitorialità in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2020, pp 76-92, DOI: 10.3280/SD2020-001005