Pianificazione e conflitti

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Daniela De Leo
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/106
Language Italian Pages 9 P. 103-111 File size 96 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2013-106008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Crosta P. L. (2006). Interazioni: pratiche, politiche e produzione di pubblico. Un percorso attraverso la letteratura, con attenzione al conflitto. CRU-Critica della Razionalità Urbanistica, 19: 27-52.
  2. De Leo D. (2010). Pianificazione nel conflitto. In: Urbanistica Informazioni. Roma: INU
  3. De Leo D. (2011). Public sphere and illegal settlements: A case from the Naples metro-region. In: Cremaschi M., Eckardt F., eds., Changing Places, Urbanity, Citizenship, and Ideology in the New European Neighbourhoods. Amsterdam: Teknè, 199-220.
  4. De Leo D. (2012a). Ricercando l’urbanistica nei territori criminali. In Bazzi A., La piazza è mia. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
  5. De Leo D. (2012b). “Jerusalem Resilient Studio: Designing the first planned Palestinian neighborhood in Jerusalem since 1967”: A critical proposal between urban development, informal housing and land occupation in a contested area. In: City Portraits: Jerusalem. Two Parallel Cities. Venezia: IUAV, 15-16 maggio.
  6. De Leo D. e Fini V. (2012). Attualità dello sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  7. Donolo C. (2012). L’arte di governare. Roma: Donzelli
  8. Fainstein S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25: 121-130. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05279275
  9. Forester J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Making participation work when interests conflict: Moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 4.
  10. Gallino L. (1993). Conflitto. In: Dizionario di Sociologia. Torino: Utet, 151-156
  11. Gallino L. (2012). La lotta di classe dopo la lotta di classe. Bari-Roma: Laterza
  12. Hirschman A. O. (1997). Autosovversione. Bologna: il Mulino
  13. Hoch C. e Cibulskis A. (1987). Planning threatened: A preliminary report of planners and political conflict. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 6: 99. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X8700600205
  14. Magatti M. (2012). La grande contrazione. Milano: Feltrinelli
  15. Mazza L. (2001). Di che cosa parliamo quando parliamo di Urbanistica “Appunti per le lezioni”. In: Tosi M. C., Di che cosa parliamo quando parliamo di Urbanistica. Roma: Meltemi, 167- 185
  16. Mazza L. (2004). Progettare gli squilibri. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Melucci A. (2000). Diventare persone. Conflitti e nuova cittadinanza nella società planetaria. Milano: EGA-Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
  18. Mouffe C. (1999). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Social Research, 66, 3:745- 58.
  19. Pizzorno A. (1993). Le radici della politica assoluta. Milano: Feltrinelli
  20. Pløger J. (2004). Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3(1): 71-92. DOI: 10.1177/1473095204042318
  21. Sager T. (2009). Responsibilities of theorists: The case of communicative planning. Progress in Planning, 72:1-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2009.03.002
  22. Secchi B. (1991). Conflitti urbani. Casabella, 42-43.
  23. Simmel G. (1955). Conflict. Glencoe: The Free Press.
  24. Trey G. A. (1992). Communicative ethics in the face of alterity: Habermas, Levinas and the problem of post-conventional universalism. Praxis International, 11(4): 412-27.
  25. Watson V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(4): 395-407. DOI: 10.1080/1464935032000146318
  26. Watson V. (2006). Deep difference: Diversity, planning and ethics. Planning Theory, 5(1): 31-50. DOI: 10.1177/1473095206061020
  27. Bascetta M. (2012). C’era una volta la governance. Il Manifesto, 27 ottobre: 10
  28. Bish R. L. e Ostrom V. (1973). Understanding Urban Government. Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
  29. Bollens Scott A. (2002). Urban planning and Intergroup conflict. Confronting a fractured public interest. APA, 68(1): 22-42.
  30. Bollens Scott A. (2011). City and Soul in Divided Societies. London: Routledge
  31. Campbell H. (2012). “Planning ethics” and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory, 11, 4: 379-399. DOI: 10.1177/1473095212442159
  32. Castells M. (2012). Reti di indignazione e speranza. Milano: Università Bocconi
  33. Ciaffi D. e Mela A. (2011). Urbanistica partecipata. Roma: Carocci

Daniela De Leo, Pianificazione e conflitti in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 106/2013, pp 103-111, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2013-106008