Capitale sociale e vantaggio competitivo nel family business. Un’analisi esplorativa delle percezioni degli amministratori delegati

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Autori/Curatori Alfredo De Massis, Josip Kotlar, Mattias Nordqvist
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 24 P. 5-28 Dimensione file 182 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2013-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This qualitative study sheds light on the nexus between social capital resources and CEO perceptions of competitive advantages and disadvantages in family firms. Drawing on a rich body of empirical evidence, the analysis shows that CEO perceptions differ depending on the owner-family’s degree of emotional attachment to or detachment from the business, emphasizing how the interactions between the family and the business system play a key role in shaping the CEO’s perceptions of competitive advantages and disadvantages in a family firm. Keywords: f

Parole chiave:Imprese familiari, capitale sociale, percezioni, vantaggi e svantaggi competitivi, legami emotivi

Jel codes:M1

  1. Sharma P. 2008. Commentary: familiness: capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6): 971-977 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00266.x
  2. Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H. 1997. Strategic management of the family business: past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10 (1): 1-35 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00001.x
  3. Siggelkow N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 20-24 DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
  4. Sirmon D.G., Hitt M.A. 2003. Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4): 339-358 DOI: 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013
  5. Spradley J P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.
  6. Tagiuri R., Davis J. 1996. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9 (2): 199-208 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x
  7. Thomas J.B., McDaniel Jr. R.R. 1990. Interpreting strategic issues: effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Academy of management Journal, 33 (2): 286-306 DOI: 10.2307/256326
  8. Wang Y., Ahmed P.K., Farquhar S.S. 2007. Founders versus descendants: the profitability, growth and efficiency characteristics comparison in the UK small and medium sized family businesses. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 16 (2): 173-195 DOI: 10.1177/097135570701600203
  9. Weick K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks
  10. Wernerfelt B. 1995. The resource based view of the firm: ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (3): 171-174 DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250160303
  11. Westhead P., Cowling M., Howorth C. 2001. The development of family companies: management and ownership imperatives. Family Business Review, 14 (4): 369-385 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00369.x
  12. Wiersema M.F., Bantel K.A. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (1): 91-121 DOI: 10.2307/256474
  13. Yin R.K. 2003. Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
  14. Zahra S.A., Hayton J.C., Salvato C. 2004. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non family firms: a resource based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (4): 363-381 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x
  15. Zellweger T. 2007. Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20 (1): 1-15 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00080.x
  16. Zellweger T., Astrachan J.H. 2008. On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21 (4): 347-363 DOI: 10.1177/08944865080210040106
  17. Zellweger T.M., Kellermanns F.W., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H. 2012. Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: the importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23 (3): 851-868 DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
  18. Carlson D.S., Upton N., Seaman S. 2006. The impact of human resource practices and compensation design on performance: an analysis of family owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44 (4): 531-543 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00188.x
  19. Carney M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 249-265 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x
  20. Chattopadhyay P., Glick W.H., Miller C.C., Huber G.P. 1999. Determinants of executive beliefs: comparing functional conditioning and social influence. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (8): 763-790 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199908)20:8<763::AID-SMJ46>3.0.CO;2-D
  21. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Litz R. 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 467-472 DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7
  22. Chrisman J.J., Steier L.P., Chua J.H. 2008. Toward a theoretical basis for understanding the dynamics of strategic performance in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6): 935-947 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00264.x
  23. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Pearson A.W., Barnett T. 2013. Family involvement, family influence, and family centered non economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, forthcoming
  24. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Kellermanns F., Wu Z. 2011. Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (4): 472-488 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.11.002
  25. Coleman J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): 95-120 DOI: 10.1086/228943
  26. Cruz C.C., Gómez-Mejia L.R., Becerra M. 2010. Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 53 (1): 69-89 DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48036975
  27. Daft R.L., Weick K.E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 284-295, doi: 10.2307/258441 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1984.4277657
  28. Danes S.M., Stafford K., Haynes G., Amarapurkar S.S. 2009. Family capital of family firms. Family Business Review, 22 (3): 199-215 DOI: 10.1177/0894486509333424
  29. De Massis A., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J. 2008. Factors preventing intra family succession. Family Business Review, 21 (2): 183-199 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
  30. Dearborn D.W.C., Simon H.A. 1958. Selective perception: a note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21 (2): 140-144 DOI: 10.2307/2785898
  31. Debicki B.J., Matherne C.F., Kellermanns F.W., Chrisman J.J. 2009. Family business research in the new millennium. Family Business Review, 22 (2): 151-166 DOI: 10.1177/0894486509333598
  32. Dyer W.G. 2006. Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19 (4): 253-273 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x
  33. Eisenhardt K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
  34. Eisenhardt K.M., Graebner M.E. 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management Journal, 50 (1): 25-32 DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
  35. Ensley M.D., Pearson A.W. 2005. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 267-284 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00082.x
  36. Finkelstein S., Hambrick D.C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3): 484-503 DOI: 10.2307/2393314
  37. Fukuyama F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press: New York.
  38. George G., Wiklund J., Zahra S.A. 2005. Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31 (2): 210-233 DOI: 10.1177/0149206304271760
  39. Gómez-Mejía L.R., Haynes K.T., Núñez-Nickel M., Jacobson K.J.L., Moyano-Fuentes J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1): 106-137.
  40. Habbershon T.G., Williams M., MacMillan I.C. 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 451-465 DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3
  41. Hage J., Dewar R. 1973. Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18 (3): 279-290 DOI: 10.2307/2391664
  42. Hambrick D.C. 1988. The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers. JAI Press: Hambrick
  43. Heck R.K.Z., Hoy F., Poutziouris P.Z., Steier L.P. 2008. Emerging paths of family entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 46 (3): 317-330, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00246.x
  44. Hoffman J., Hoelscher M., Sorenson R. 2006. Achieving sustained competitive advantage: a family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19 (2): 135-145 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00065.x
  45. Horton T. 1986. Managing in a family way. Management Review, 75 (2): 3.
  46. Irava W.J., Moores K. 2010. Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1 (3): 131-144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.002
  47. Ireland R., Hitt M., Vaidyanath D. 2002. Strategic alliances as a pathway to competitive success. Journal of Management, 28 (3): 413-446 DOI: 10.1177/014920630202800308
  48. Janis I.L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin: Boston
  49. Koka B.R., Prescott J.E. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (9): 795-816 DOI: 10.1002/smj.252
  50. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (2): 471-517 DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00115
  51. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266 10.5465/AMR.1998.533225 DOI: 10.2307/259373
  52. Pearson A.W., Carr J.C., Shaw J.C. 2008. Toward a theory of familiness: a social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6): 949-969 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00265.x
  53. Peters R., Koufteros X., Berman S. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and the chief executive officer: determinants of a positive strategic intention towards corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 6 (1): 38-54 DOI: 10.1504/IJMED.2009.021735
  54. Priem R.L. 1994. Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organization Science, 5 (3): 421-437 DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.421
  55. Rutten M. 2001. Family enterprises and business partnerships: rural entrepreneurs in India, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 10 (2): 165-189 DOI: 10.1177/097135570101000203
  56. Adler P.S. 2002. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 17-40 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314
  57. Aldrich H.E., Cliff J.E. 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (5): 573-596 DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
  58. Amason A.C., Sapienza H.J. 1997. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23 (4): 495 DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300401
  59. Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M. 2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58 (3): 1301-1327 DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
  60. Arregle J.L., Hitt M.A., Sirmon D.G., Very P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44 (1): 73-106 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
  61. Berrone P., Cruz C., Gomez-Mejia L.R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25 (3): 258-279 DOI: 10.1177/0894486511435355
  62. Beyer J.M., Chattopadhyay P., George E., Glick W.H., Ogilvie D., Pugliese D. 1997. The selective perception of managers revisited. Academy of management Journal, 40 (3): 716-737 DOI: 10.2307/257060
  63. Boyd J., Upton N., Wircenski M. 1999. Mentoring in family firms: a reflective analysis of senior executives’ perceptions. Family Business Review, 12 (4): 299-309 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00299.x
  64. Bubolz M. 2001. Family as source, user, and builder of social capital. Journal of Socio- Economics, 30 (6): 129-131 DOI: 10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00091
  65. Burt R.S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behavior, 22 (6): 345-423 DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1

Alfredo De Massis, Josip Kotlar, Mattias Nordqvist, Capitale sociale e vantaggio competitivo nel family business. Un’analisi esplorativa delle percezioni degli amministratori delegati in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 2/2013, pp 5-28, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2013-002001