Destructive aggression in the interhuman relation-ship: an evolutionary perspective

Journal title PSICOBIETTIVO
Author/s Giovanni Liotti, Lucia Pancheri, Claudio Iannucci, Enrico Costantini, Rosario Esposito, Giuseppe Pollani, Erika Belfiore
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/3
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 161-173 File size 120 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2018-003016
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

SUMMARY. The evolutionary theory of motivation contributes to the understanding of destructiveness in the interhuman relationship, based on the following arguments:
- there is a strong tendency that appeared in the course of evolution, as an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), to inhibit destructive aggression in clashes between conspecifics;
-some environmental conditions which can be defined sociologically and in humans can also be defined psychologically as they are linked to particular relationship contexts in which the personality development takes place, can weaken this tendency to the extent to cancel its effects;
- in the weakening of the inhibiting mechanism of violence (MoV), as even in its empowerment, motivations and higher mental functions intervene, which typically develop as evolutionary plumes;
- the weakening of MoV causes the actualization of two forms of destructiveness that can afflict the interhuman relationship, which is respectively connected to defense system for survival and the predatory system;
- the knowledge of the behavioral and emotional sequences, characteristic of the two systems, helps to clinically recognize the two forms of interhuman destructiveness in the study of psychopathology.

Keywords: Evolutionary Theory of Motivations (ETM); Aggression Inter-Speci-fic; Destructiveness; Inhibitory Mechanisms of Violence (MoV); Predation.

  1. Liotti G. (2014) “Disorganized attachment in the pathogenesis and the psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder”, in Danquah A., Berry K. (eds.), Attachment theory in adult mental health, Routledge, London, pp. 113-128
  2. Liotti G., Farina B. (2011) Sviluppi traumatici, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  3. Lorenz K. (1963) L’aggressività: Il cosiddetto male (trad. it.: Il Saggiatore, Milano, 2015)
  4. Morris D. (1967) La scimmia nuda (trad. it.: Bompiani, Milano, 1974)
  5. Schore A.N. (2009) “Attachment, trauma and the developing right brain: Origins of pathological dissociation”, in Dell P.F., O’Neil J.A. (eds.), Dissociation and the dissociative disorders, Routledge, New York, pp. 107-141
  6. Solomon J., George C. (2011) “Disorganization of maternal caregiving across two generations: The origins of caregiving helplessness”, in Solomon J., George C. (eds.), Disorganized attachment and caregiving, Guilford, New York, pp. 25-51
  7. Thomas M.E. (2013) Confessioni di una sociopatica (trad. it.: Marsilio, Padova, 2013)
  8. Vogt R. (2013) Perpetrator introjects, Asanger Verlag, Kröning
  9. Linehan M.M. (1993) Trattamento cognitivo-comportamentale del disturbo borderline: Il modello dialettico (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2001)
  10. Keegan J. (1993) La grande storia della guerra (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1994)
  11. Hare R.D. (2003) PCL-R, seconda edizione (trad. it.: Giunti O.S., Firenze, 2011)
  12. Hare R.D. (1994) “Predators: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us”, Psychology Today, Jan/Feb
  13. Fromm E. (1973) Anatomia della distruttività umana (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1975)
  14. Fonagy P., Target M. (2008) “Attaccamento, trauma e psicoanalisi: dove la psicoanalisi incontra le neuroscienze”, in Jurist E.L., Slade A., Bergner S. (a cura di), Da mente a mente (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2010)
  15. Dawkins R. (1976) Il gene egoista (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1992)
  16. Bowlby J. (1984) La violenza nella famiglia (trad. it. in Bowlby J., Una base sicura, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 1989, pp. 73-93)
  17. Blair R. (1995) “A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath”, Cognition, 57: 1-29. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-
  18. Belfiore E., Costantini E., Dettori M., Esposito R., Iannucci C., Pancheri L., Pollani G. (2014) I sistemi motivazionali arcaici compaiono nel dialogo terapeutico. I sistemi di predazione e difesa. Relazione presentata al XVII Congresso Nazionale SITTC, Genova, 28 settembre
  19. Barnà A.C. (2015) Etica e psicoanalisi. Relazione presentata al Centro di Psicoanalisi Romano, 16 maggio
  20. American Psychiatric Association (2013) DSM-5:Manuale Diagnostico e Statistico dei Disturbi Mentali, quinta edizione (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2014)
  21. Anderson C.A., Shibuya A., Ihori N., Swing E., Bushman B.J., Sakamoto A., Rothstein H.R., Saleem M. (2010) “Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review”, Psychological Bulletin, 136(2): 151-173.

Giovanni Liotti, Lucia Pancheri, Claudio Iannucci, Enrico Costantini, Rosario Esposito, Giuseppe Pollani, Erika Belfiore, L’aggressività distruttiva nella relazione interumana: una prospettiva evoluzionistica in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 3/2018, pp 161-173, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2018-003016