Using a social robot for different types of feedback during university lectures

In this paper we present a long-term study in which a social robot was used as an embodied feedback channel during a series of university lectures spanning over one academic year. We used a Pepper robot from Softbank Robotics within an enactive didactics framework in order to reinforce the structural coupling between the teacher, the students and the content of the lecture. The robot provided different types of feedback during the lectures. In this paper we will focus on feedback that informed the students of their learning progress and that helped the teacher to understand how the students were able to follow each lecture. At the end of the lecture series we used questionnaires as qualitative measures for how the students perceived the feedback of the robot. Our results show a positive response of the students to the robot. We asked the students also how they thought the robot’s feedback affected their learning progress. The vast majority of the students reported that the robot indeed helped them to reflect about their level of understanding of the content of the lecture and facilitated the initiation of interventions to improve their learning.

In this paper we present a long-term study in which a social robot was used as an embodied feedback channel during a series of university lectures spanning over one academic year. We used a Pepper robot from Softbank Robotics within an enactive didactics framework in order to reinforce the structural coupling between the teacher, the students and the content of the lecture. The robot provided different types of feedback during the lectures. In this paper we will focus on feedback that informed the students of their learning progress and that helped the teacher to understand how the students were able to follow each lecture. At the end of the lecture series we used questionnaires as qualitative measures for how the students perceived the feedback of the robot. Our results show a positive response of the students to the robot. We asked the students also how they thought the robot’s feedback affected their learning progress. The vast majority of the students reported that the robot indeed helped them to reflect about their level of understanding of the content of the lecture and facilitated the initiation of interventions to improve their learning.

Parole chiave:; Enactive didactics; Feedback; Social Robots; Structural Coupling; Robot mediators

• Educational robotics studies in Italian scientific journals: A systematic review Giovanni Bonaiuti, Lucia Campitiello, Stefano Di Tore, Arianna Marras, in Frontiers in Education 1005669/2022
  DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1005669
• 2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN) Melissa Donnermann, Birgit Lugrin, pp.1279 (DOI:10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731431)
• Socially Aware and Responsible AI Applications Antonio Vitale, Bruno Carbonaro, Gennaro Cordasco, Umberto Dello Iacono, Anna Esposito, pp.217 (ISBN:978-981-95-4075-4)
• Using social robots as inclusive educational technology for mathematics learning through storytelling Antonio Vitale, Umberto Dello Iacono, in European Public & Social Innovation Review /2024 pp.1
  DOI: 10.31637/epsir-2024-672
• Proceedings of the 2024 16th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers Melissa Donnermann, Birgit Lugrin, pp.1 (DOI:10.1145/3702163.3702164)

Hagen Lehmann, Petr Svarny, Using a social robot for different types of feedback during university lectures in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 2/2021, pp 282-295, DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12485