Digital Robotic Therapies

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA
Autori/Curatori Lino Rossi, Cecilia Pellizzari, Enrico Orsenigo
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 14 P. 115-128 Dimensione file 726 KB
DOI 10.3280/RSF2024-003007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’insegnamento di Digital Robotic Therapies fa parte del Cor- so di Laurea Triennale in Digital Education del Dipartimento Chirurgico, Medico, Odontoiatrico e di Scienze Morfologiche con interesse Trapiantolo- gico, Oncologico e di Medicina Rigenerativa (CHIMOMO). Si tratta di un insegnamento che, inserito nel Corso di Laurea in Digital Education, si pone a tutti gli effetti come un ponte tra la formazione delle conoscenze teoriche atte a sviluppare le competenze pratiche necessarie per operare adeguatamente ed efficacemente nei contesti educativi e formativi digitali e le pratiche di aiuto coinvolte oggi nelle trasformazioni onlife. Le caratteristiche distintive della formazione in Digital Robotic Therapies derivano dall’esigenza di sviluppare una conoscenza che possa collegare, sia a livello umano che professionale, le veloci evoluzioni delle tecnologie digita- li con l’ambito dell’educazione e della psicopedagogia.

Parole chiave:tecnologie digitali, intelligenze umane, psicopatologia del- lo sviluppo, robotica educativa.

  1. Gardner H. Multiple Intelligences after Twenty Years. Chicago, IL: The American Educational Research Association 2003: 5-6.
  2. Gardner H. Formae Mentis. Saggio sulla pluralità dell’intelligenza. Mi- lano: Feltrinelli; 1987.
  3. Battro A, Denham PJ. Verso un’intelligenza digitale. Milano: Ledizio- ni; 2007.
  4. Floridi L, Nobre AC. Anthropomorphising machines and computeris- ing minds: the crosswiring of languages between Artificial Intelligence and Brain & Cognitive Sciences. Centre for Digital Ethics (CEDE) Re- search Paper No. Forthcoming 2024, [Online]. -- https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4738331 [10.10.2024]
  5. Goh H, Aris B. Using Robotics In Education: Lessons Learned And Learning Experiences. Proceedings of the 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention 2007: 1156-1162.
  6. Tanaka G, Cicourel A, Movellan J. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007; 104(46): 17954-17958.
  7. Alemi M, Ghanbarzadeh A, Meghdari A, Moghadam LJ. Clinical Application of a Humanoid Robot in Pediatric Cancer Interventions. International Journal of Social Robotics 2015; 8: 743–759.
  8. Park IW, Han J. Teachers Views On The Use Of Robots And Cloud Ser- vices In Education For Sustainable Development. Cluster Computing 2016; 19: 987–999.
  9. Brown L, Kerwin R, Howard AM. Applying Behavioral Strategies for Student Engagement Using a Robotic Educational Agent. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cy- bernetics 2013; 4360–4365. DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2013.744
  10. Ioannou A, Andreoui E, Christofi M. Pre-schoolers’ interest and car- ing behaviour around a humanoid robot. Techtrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning 2015; 59(2): 23–26.
  11. National Association for the Education of Young Children. Technolo- gy and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Joint position statement issued by the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media, Saint Vincent College, 2012. [Online]. Disponibile su: -- https://www.naeyc.org/ con- tent/technology-and-young-children [ultima consultazione 10.10.2024]
  12. Woods S, Dautenhahn K, Schulz J. The design space of robots: Inves- tigating children’s views. IEEE Xplore 2004; 47–52. https:// DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374728
  13. Georgieva-Tsaneva G. Exploring the potential of social robots for speech and language therapy: a review and analysis of interactive scenarios. Machines 2023; 11(7): 693.
  14. Feil-Seifer D, Mataric MJ. Defining socially assistive robotics. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2005; 465–468. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
  15. Ramachandran A, Huang CM, Scassellati B. Give me a break!: per- sonalized timing strategies to promote learning in robot-child tutoring. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Humna-Robot Interaction 2017; 146–155. DOI: 10.1145/2909824.3020209
  16. Chen H, Park HW, Breazeal C. Teaching and learning with children: impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Comput. Educ. 2020.
  17. Obaid M. Endowing a robotic tutor with empathic qualities: design and pilot evaluation», Int. J. Human. Rob 2018; 15(6): 1-32. DOI: 10.1142/S0219843618600251
  18. Hegel F, Muhl C, Wrede B, Hielscher-Fastabend M, Sagerer G. Un- derstanding Social Robots. Second International Conferences on Ad- vances in Computer-Human Interactions 2009; 169–174. DOI: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.51
  19. Baxter P, Ashurst E, Read R, Kennedy J, Belpaeme T. Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(5): e0178126.
  20. Logan DE. Social Robots for hospitalized children. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (1): e20181511.
  21. Rossi S. Using the Social Robot NAO for emotional support to children at a pediatric emergency department: randomized clinical trial. J Med. Internet Res (2022); 24(1): e29656. DOI: 10.2196/29656
  22. Dawe J, Sutherland C, Barco A, Broadbent E. Can Social Robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ Paediatr. Open 2019; 3: e000371.
  23. Moerman CJ, Van der Heide L, Heerink M. Social Robots to support children’s well-being under medical-treatment: a systematic state-of- the-art review. J. Child Health Care 2019;, 23(4): 596–612. DOI: 10.1177/1367493518803031
  24. Bertin GM. Nietzsche: inattuale, idea pedagogica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia; 1977.

Lino Rossi, Cecilia Pellizzari, Enrico Orsenigo, Digital Robotic Therapies in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 3/2024, pp 115-128, DOI: 10.3280/RSF2024-003007