Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Davide Bondì
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2024/4
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 20 P. 668-687 Dimensione file 250 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2024-004003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più
clicca qui
Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.
Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF
FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche
The article takes a position in the current debate on Antonio Labriola’s philosophy of praxis by identifying for the first time the historical document that prompted him to adopt the term. It is a review from 1897 in which Charles Andler laments the lack of attention to the gnoseological problem internal to Marx’s conception in the early essays on historical materialism. The use of the term in the discussion thus does not stem from an elaboration of the Theses on Feuerbach, which were deliberately neglected until 1897 and not even com- mented on later. Confronted with the reproach of not understanding the value of the Theses, Labriola reacted by showing that the philosophical concept of praxis should not be subject to the scholastic-gnoseological approach but reinserted in a different ar- gumentative context. In the light of these considerations, the central section explains the peculiar features attributed by Labriola to the philosophy of praxis (1 - social gene- sis of needs;; 2 - relational structure of subjectivity;; 3 – ‘nexus of historicity’, i.e. inte- raction of psychic energy and historical objectifications) and elucidates the structural link that binds these features to the morphological and subordinate-dialectical concep- tion of history. Faced with Giovanni Gentile’s revival of the gnoseological-metaphysi- cal motif of Marxism, Labriola expressed an absolute and ironic dissent. In the ideali- stic transfiguration of the concept of praxis he grasped the danger of an overall arrest of culture, a disarticulation of the existing relationship between philosophy and the sciences and, ultimately, a retreat of philosophical engagement from the political hi- story of the new century.
Parole chiave:philosophy of praxis, dialectic, historical materialism, Charles Andler, Georges Sorel, Giovanni Gentile.
Davide Bondì, La filosofia della <i>praxis</i> di Antonio Labriola in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2024, pp 668-687, DOI: 10.3280/SF2024-004003