Compartmentalization and unity of professional psychology. A road map for the future of the discipline

Journal title RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
Author/s Sergio Salvatore, Agata Ando', Ruggero Andrisano Ruggieri, Fiorella Bucci, Barbara Cordella, Maria Francesca Freda, Caterina Lombardo, Gianluca Lo Coco, Cinzia Novara, Annamaria Petito, Adriano Schimmenti, Elena Vegni, Claudia Venuleo, Andrea Zagaria, Alessandro Zennaro
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1
Language English Pages 27 P. 7-33 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14450
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The compartmentalization of psychological science and of the profession prevents the progress of the discipline. Compartmentalization is a collateral effect of the impressive scientific, methodological, and technical development of psychology, which has led to the emergence of specialized segments of knowledge and practice that unavoidably tend to progress separately from each other and weaken their reciprocal linkage. The work highlights the limits of compartmentalization and discusses motives that call for the unity of psychology. Three approaches to unification are outlined: I) the identification of the ultimate causal explanation; II) the progressive extension of the explicative capacity of specific theories; III) the building of a metatheoretical framework. Finally, the paper proposes the intervention as the criterion to compare the capacity of the three approaches to unity. According to this criterion, approaches can be validated by reason of their ability to enable professional psychology to address the current challenges that people and society have to face.

  1. Gaj, N. (2009). Verso un modello unificato in psicologia clinica. Un’analisi storico epistemologica sullo sviluppo della disciplina. Ricerche di Psicologia, 75-94.
  2. Arkin, R. M., Oleson, K. C., & Carroll, P. J. (eds.) (2013). Handbook of the uncertain self. London: Psychology Press.
  3. Baker M. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533, 452-454.
  4. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  5. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. London: Hogarth.
  6. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. III. Loss: Sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  8. Bowlby, R. (2004). Fifty years of attachment theory. London: Karnac.
  9. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
  10. Di Clemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: strategies for improving public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(4), 377-378.
  11. Di Nuovo S. (2020). Searching for Models for Psychological Science: A Possible Contribution of Simulation. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 54, 701-709.
  12. Duschinsky, R., & White, K. (eds.) (2019). Trauma and Loss: Key Texts from the John Bowlby Archive. London: Routledge.
  13. Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 5(4), e10068.
  14. Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 8(6).
  15. Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. In J. Strachy & A.
  16. Freud (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume VII (1901-1905): A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works (pp. 123-246). London: Hogarth Press.
  17. Freud, S. (1938) Some Elementary Lessons in Psycho-Analysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 23: 279-286.
  18. Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L., & Larzelere, R. (1993). Changes in modern psychology: a citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48(6), 658.
  19. Gilbert, P., & Bailey, K. G. (eds.) (2014). Genes on the couch: Explorations in evolutionary psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
  20. Green, C. D. (2015). Why psychology isn’t unified, and probably never will be. Review of General Psychology, 19(3): 207-214.
  21. Hagger, M. S. (2009). Theoretical integration in health psychology: unifying ideas and complementary explanations. British Journal of Health Psychology. 14(Pt 2): 189-94.
  22. Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. London: Century/Random House UK.
  23. Henriques G. (2017). Achieving a unified clinical science requires a metatheoretical solution: Comment on Melchert (2016). The American psychologist, 72(4): 393-394.
  24. Henriques, G. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.
  25. James, W. (1894). Epilogue. Psychology, briefer course, Vol. 14 (pp. 395-401). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  26. Kazdin, A. (2008). Unity: Psychology’s immunity booster. Monitor on Psychology. -- https://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/03/pc.
  27. Kimble, G. A. (1990). Mother Nature’s bag of tricks is small. Psychological Science, 1, 36-41.
  28. Koch, S. (1993). “Psychology” or the “psychological studies”. American Psychologist, 48, 902-904.
  29. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  30. Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167.
  31. Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (2011). Psychoanalysis and Motivation Systems: A New Look. New York: Routledge.
  32. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2013). Adevelopmental evolutionary framework for psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 184-189.
  33. Mandler, G. (2011). From association to organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 232-235.
  34. Marsh, T., & Boag, S. (2014). Unifying psychology: Shared ontology and the continuum of practical assumptions. Review of General Psychology, 18, 49-59.
  35. Melchert T. P. (2016). Leaving behind our preparadigmatic past: Professional psychology as a unified clinical science. The American psychologist, 71(6), 486-496.
  36. Miller, G. (1985). The constitutive problem of psychology. In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 40-45). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  37. Misra, G., Pirta, R. S., Misra, I., & Chandra, N. (2021). The game of science and puzzles of paradigm. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(1), 167-180.
  38. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
  39. Norcross, J. C., & Cooper, M. (2021). Personalizing Psychotherapy. Assessing and Accomodating Patient Preferences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  40. Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  41. Prilleltensky, I. (2012). Wellness as Fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 1-21.
  42. Rapaport, T. D. (1960). The Structure of Psychoanalytic Theory. New York, Int. Univ. Press.
  43. Riolo, F. (ed.) (2021). Teorie psicoanalitiche a confronto. Una indagine assiomatica [Comparing psychoanalytic theories. An axiomatic investigation]. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 68 (4), 787-1029.
  44. Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54(2), 117-128.
  45. Roeckelein, J. E. (1996a). Citation of laws and theories in textbooks across 112 years of psychology. Psychological Reports, 79, 979-998.
  46. Roeckelein, J. E. (1996b). Contributions to the history of psychology: CIV.
  47. Eminence in psychology as measured by name counts and eponyms. Psychological Reports, 78(1), 243-253.
  48. Roeckelein, J. E. (1997). Psychology among the sciences: Comparisons of numbers of theories and laws cited in textbooks. Psychological Reports, 80, 131-141.
  49. Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theorydriven science. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
  50. Salvatore, S. (2017). The formalization of cultural psychology. Reasons and functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9366-2
  51. Shepard, R. N. (2004). How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 1-23. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206455
  52. Siegel, D. J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Publications.
  53. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  54. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 59-67.
  55. Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychology as a science within Comte’s hypothesized hierarchy: Empirical investigations and conceptual implications. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 334-344.
  56. Spear, J. H. (2007). Prominent schools or other active specialties? A fresh look at some trends in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 363-380.
  57. Stam, H. J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1259-1262.
  58. Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and Experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London: Palgrave.
  59. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Unifying the field of psychology. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream? (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  60. Tatman, A. W., & Gilgen, A. R. (1999). Authorities and research emphasized in the Annual Review of Psychology, 1975-1998. Psychological reports, 85(1), 89-100.
  61. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2015). The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 3-87). Hoboken (NJ) USA: Wiley & Son.
  62. Toomela, A., &. J. Valsiner (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  63. Toomela, A. (2020). Psychology today: Still in denial, still outdated. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 563-571.
  64. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). Tracking trends in psychological science. In T. C. Dalton & R. B Evans (eds.), The life cycle of psychological ideas (pp. 105-130). Boston: Springer.
  65. Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating Psychology within the Globalizing World: A Requiem to the Post-Modernist Experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1-21.
  66. Valsiner, J., & Salvatore, S. (2012). How Idiographic Science could create its terminology? In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner & A. Gennaro (eds.). Making Sense of Infinite Uniqueness: The emerging system of Idiographic Science Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 4 (pp 3-20). Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
  67. Vygotskij, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published in 1934).
  68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1927/1997). The historical meaning of the crisis of psychology. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 233-344). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  69. Wagemans, J. (2018). Perceptual organization. In J. T. Wixed (ed.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (Vol. 2. Sensation, Perception, & Attention, pp. 803-872). Hoboken (NJ) USA: Wiley & Son.
  70. Zagaria, A., Ando’, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 521-562.
  71. Zagaria, A., Ando’, A., & Zennaro, A. (2021). Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(2), 225-249

  • Generating a beneficial creative chaos to manage compartmentalization in psychology: A trans-disciplinary approach to intertwine plurality and unity A. Claudio Bosio, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2023 pp.63
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14879
  • Dynamics of defragmentation Tania Zittoun, Martina Cabra, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2022 pp.75
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14459
  • Beyond Compartmentalization: Generalizing Clinical Knowledge in Psychology Jaan Valsiner, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2023 pp.92
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14892
  • The ACES Guide for Researchers in Psychology: Fostering Researchers’ Informed Decision-Making about Theory Selection and Theoretical Integration Martijn van Zomeren, in Review of General Psychology /2024 pp.17
    DOI: 10.1177/10892680231182033
  • Norcia and the central italian earthquake: Challenges and lessons learned from the italian psychiatric reform movement Richard F. Mollica, Sonia Graziano, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2023 pp.103
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2023oa16368
  • Psychology and Market. Commentary on: "Psychology profession, clinical psychology, psychotherapy. Specificities and boundaries" Ruggero Andrisano Ruggieri, Maria Monaco, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2025 pp.101
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2024oa18070
  • Outline of a grand theory of psychological activity Gordon Sammut, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2022 pp.49
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14456
  • La psicologia della salute come professione: stato, prospettive e implicazioni per la disciplina e la formazione A. Claudio Bosio, Luca P. Vecchio, Edoardo Lozza, in PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE 1/2024 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/PDS2024-001001
  • The necessity and the challenges for a unified model of clinical psychology: A commentary on Salvatore et al., 2022 Stanley Berman, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2023 pp.97
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2023oa15427
  • On unifying psychology: A view from the trenches; and what's wrong with pluralism anyway? Jose’ Saporta, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2022 pp.60
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14458
  • On the quest for disciplinary unity and the virtues of open concepts Brady Wagoner, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2023 pp.103
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14745
  • Digital Well-Being as a New Kind of Adaptation to the New Millennium Needs: A State-of-the-Art Analysis Alessandro De Santis, Stefania Fantinelli, in Elementa. Intersections between Philosophy, Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives 2/2024
    DOI: 10.7358/elementa-2023-0102-safa
  • Two sources for a meta-theoretical framework in psychology Sven Hroar Klempe, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2022
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14455
  • Towards a Semiotic Cultural Clinical Psychology: Contributions for the Discussion Mónica Roncancio-Moreno, Rita Patricia Ocampo-Cepeda, Juan José Cleves-Valencia, in Human Arenas /2023
    DOI: 10.1007/s42087-023-00372-4
  • Three approaches to overcome compartmentalization: A brief epistemological analysis Nicolò Gaj, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2024 pp.103
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2024oa17127

Sergio Salvatore, Agata Ando', Ruggero Andrisano Ruggieri, Fiorella Bucci, Barbara Cordella, Maria Francesca Freda, Caterina Lombardo, Gianluca Lo Coco, Cinzia Novara, Annamaria Petito, Adriano Schimmenti, Elena Vegni, Claudia Venuleo, Andrea Zagaria, Alessandro Zennaro, Compartmentalization and unity of professional psychology. A road map for the future of the discipline in "RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA" 1/2022, pp 7-33, DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14450