Thumbs and neurons: analysing digital platforms in learning through thematic analysis

Journal title RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Author/s Maria Fabiani, Patrizio Pastore
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/92
Language English Pages 27 P. 96-122 File size 266 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2025-092006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Digital platforms are transforming pedagogical possibilities and learning processes, challenging traditional relationships with knowledge. One of the points most often overlooked in optimistic and pessimistic discourses about the pedagogical potential of digital platforms is that their use is itself a learning process. Beyond the variety of devices through which they can be accessed and the ways in which they can be used, digital platforms share the common characteristic of renewing the mediation of our relationship with the world. This analysis asks whether these technologies enable greater independence from social determinants and how they are reshaping our understanding of learning towards greater autonomy outside conventional education systems. Through a thematic analysis and a theoretical reflection, the authors explore these complexities and highlight the dual role of 'thumbs and neurons' in developing an operational framework for platform literacy and its evaluation.

Keywords: digital platform; digital literacy; transmedia literacy; social determinants; thematic analysis; artificial intelligence.

  1. Andrade Johnson, M. D. S. (2019). Digital equity: 1:1 technology and associated pedagogy. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 1-15). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_142-
  2. Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagne, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific outputs in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68, 329-342.
  3. Arcus, C., & Andersen, N. (2021, July 5). What should media literacy be now? Mediacy with Carol Arcus and Neil Andersen [Podcast]. Available at https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/what-should-media-literacy-education-be-now/id1459917252?i=1000527908197
  4. Bennett, S. (2012). Digital natives. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cyber behavior (pp. 212–219). IGI Global.
  5. Bennett, S., & Corrin, L. (2019). From digital natives to student experiences with technology. In D. B. A. M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Advanced methodologies and technologies in modern education delivery (pp. 356–366). IGI Global.
  6. Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363-376.
  7. Braidotti, R. (2002). Nuovi soggetti nomadi: Transizioni e identità postnazionaliste. Luca Sossella Editore.
  8. Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357–369.
  9. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196-233). Routledge & Kegan Paul
  10. Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/3884
  11. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). Mediating vulnerability: Cosmopolitanism and the public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 35(1), 105–112. DOI: 10.1177/016344371246456
  12. Chouliaraki, L., & Stolic, T. (2017). Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee ‘crisis’: A visual typology of European news. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1162–1177. DOI: 10.1177/016344371772616
  13. Corrin, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2010). Digital natives: Everyday life versus academic study. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 643-650). Lancaster University.
  14. Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (2018/C 189/01). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
  15. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.
  16. Scolari, C. A. (2019). From media literacy to transmedia literacy. DigitCult - Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures, 4(1), 37–46. DOI: 10.4399/9788825523008
  17. Crawford, T., Duong, S., Fueston, R., Lawani, A., Owoade, S., Uzoka, A., Parizi, R., & Yazdinejad, A. (2023). AI in Software Engineering: A Survey on Project Management Applications. ArXiv, abs/2307.15224.
  18. Creighton, T. B. (2018). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Digital Learners: An International Empirical Integrative Review of the Literature. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), 132-140.
  19. De Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124-135.
  20. Duque, P., & Cervantes-Cervantes, L.-S. (2019). Responsabilidad Social Universitaria: Una revisión sistemática y análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 451–464.
  21. European Commission. (2023, May 16). Online platforms | Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-platforms
  22. Fabiani, M. & Pastore, P. (2023) Designing Microlearning Programmes for Centennials Tastes. Community Notebook People, Education, and Welfare in society 5.0, 2, 153-199
  23. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
  24. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2788/5296
  25. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). University of Massachusetts Press.
  26. Garcia, M. B., Juanatas, I. C., & Juanatas, R. A. (2022). TikTok as a Knowledge Source for Programming Learners: A NewForm of Nanolearning? 2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET), 219–223. DOI: 10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9779004
  27. Glauberman, J. (2019). Citation management tools, undergraduate research practices, and the myth of the digital native.LibTech.
  28. Goodman, D., & Deis, L. (2007). Update on Scopus and Web of Science. The Charleston Advisor, 7(3), 15–18.
  29. Granjon, F. (2011). Fracture numérique. Communications, 2011/1(88), 67-74.
  30. Granjon, F. (2022). Classes populaires et usages de l’informatique connectée: Des inégalités sociales-numériques.Presses des Mines.
  31. Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
  32. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qffwr
  33. Jolls, T., & Johnsen, M. (2018). Media literacy: A foundational skill for democracy in the 21st century. Hastings Law Journal, 69(5), 1379. Available at https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol69/iss5/4
  34. Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5).
  35. Kacinová, V., & Sádaba Chalezquer, C. (2022). Conceptualización de la competencia mediática como una “competencia aumentada”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 80(4). DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2022-151
  36. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008a). First-year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1).
  37. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008b). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008, 484–492.
  38. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343.
  39. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846–854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  40. Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
  41. Li, S., & Fan, L. (2022). Media multitasking, depression, and anxiety of college students: Serial mediating effects of attention control and negative information attentional bias. Frontiers in psychiatry, 13, 989201.
  42. Liu, W. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121023.
  43. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103–1122. DOI: 10.1177/146144481668593
  44. Madore, K. P., & Wagner, A. D. (2019). Multicosts of Multitasking. Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science, 2019, cer-04-19.
  45. Marangi, M., Pasta, S., & Rivoltella, P. C. (2023). Quando povertà educativa digitale e povertà educativa non coincidono: Descrizione socio-demografica e culturale, competenze digitali, interrogativi educativi. Q-TIMES Webmagazine, XV, 181–199.
  46. Markauskaite, L., Marrone, R., Poquet, O., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Howard, S., Tondeur, J., De Laat, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Gaševic, D., & Siemens, G. (2022). Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100056.
  47. Martínez-Bravo, M.-C., Sádaba-Chalezquer, C., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2020). Fifty years of digital literacy studies: A meta-research for interdisciplinary and conceptual convergence. El Profesional de la Información, 29(4).
  48. McDougall, J., & Rega, I. (2022). Beyond Solutionism: Differently Motivating Media Literacy. Media Communication, X (4), 267-276.
  49. McLuhan, M. (2008). Gli strumenti del comunicare. Il Saggiatore.
  50. Mihailidis, P., Ramasubramanian, S., Tully, M., Foster, B., Riewestahl, E., Johnson, P., & Angove, S. (2021). Do media literacies approach equity and justice? Journal of Media Literacy Education, 13(2), 1–14. DOI: 10.23860/JMLE-2021-13-2-
  51. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). DOI: 10.1177/160940691773384
  52. Octobre, S. (2014). Deux pouces et des neurones: Les cultures juvéniles de l'ère médiatique à l'ère numérique. La Documentation française.
  53. Paino, M., & Renzulli, L. A. (2013). Digital dimension of cultural capital: The (in)visible advantages for students who exhibit computer skills. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 124-138. DOI: 10.1177/003804071245655
  54. Potter, J. & McDougall, J. (2017) Digital Media, Culture and Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer
  55. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  56. Puech, M. (2016). The ethics of ordinary technology. Routledge.
  57. Scolari, C. A. (2016). Transmedia literacy: Informal learning strategies and media skills in the new ecology of communication. Telos, 103, 13–23.
  58. Scolari, C., Masanet, M., Guerrero-Pico, M., & Establés, M. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: Teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El Profesional de la Información, 27(4), 801–812.
  59. Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital technology and the contemporary university: Degrees of digitization. Routledge.
  60. Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14.
  61. Stallkamp, M., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2021). Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms. Global Strategy Journal, 11(1), 58–80.
  62. Stern, C., Lizarondo, L., Carrier, J., Stowers, K., Maeso, N., Bangura, J. S., & Apostolo, J. (2020). Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18, 2108–2118. DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169
  63. Swierstra, T., & Waelbers, K. (2012). Designing a good life: A matrix for the technological mediation of morality. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 157–172.
  64. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-4
  65. Toronto, C., Remington, R. (eds) (2020). A Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting an Integrative Review. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1_
  66. Vitvitskaya, O., Suyo-Vega, J. A., Meneses-La-Riva, M. E., & Fernández-Bedoya, V. H. (2022). Behaviours and Characteristics of Digital Natives Throughout the Teaching-Learning Process: A Systematic Review of Scientific Literature from 2016 to 2021. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(3), 38-49.
  67. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens – With new examples of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/49027
  68. Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G. E., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1202-1211.
  69. Wiltshire, G., & Ronkainen, N. (2021). A realist approach to thematic analysis: Making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential, and dispositional themes. Journal of Critical Realism, 20, 159–180. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2021.189490
  70. Yablonsky, S. A. (2020). AI-driven digital platform innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(10).

Maria Fabiani, Patrizio Pastore, Thumbs and neurons: analysing digital platforms in learning through thematic analysis in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 92/2025, pp 96-122, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2025-092006