Squaring the circle? Reflections on Positive Bonding and Negative Relationship in two psychotherapy groups with young adults: A comparison of online and in-presence setting

Journal title GRUPPI
Author/s Ilaria Locati, Alessandra Gaffo, Margherita Forgione, Beatrice Ventura, Daniela Di Riso
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 125-145 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/gruoa2-2021oa15812
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The authors present an explorative research and a clinical reflection by comparing two time-limited homogeneous groups with young adults: one was face to face in private practice and the other was online mode within the Centro Ateneo dei Servizi Clinici Universitari Psicologici (SCUP) of the University of Padua. Starting from the data collected with the Group Questionnaire (Krogel et al., 2013), some reflections on the development of the therapeutic process face to face and online are presented by comparing the Positive Bonding and the Negative relationship. The clinical material presented attempts to explore the differences and understand the dynamics of the group in the two different sets.

Keywords: ; Time limited homogeneous group; Young adult; Therapeutic process; Face to face vs online

  1. Arnett J.J (2020). Emerging Adulthood. A Theory of Development from the Late Teens Through the Twenties May 2000. American Psychologist, 55, 5: 469-480. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
  2. Biolcati R., Agostini F. e Mancini G. (2017). Analytical Psychodrama with College Students Suffering from Mental Health Problems: Preliminary Outcomes. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 20, 3. DOI: 10.4081/ripppo.2017.272
  3. Budman S.H. e Gurman A.S. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Brief Therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Delmastro M. e Zamariola G. (2020). Depressive Symptoms in Response to COVID-19 and Lockdown: a Cross-sectional Study on the Italian Population. Sci. Rep., 10, 22457. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79850-6
  5. Di Blasi M. e Di Falco G. (2011). Adolescenza e confini psichici. In: Lo Verso G. e Di Blasi M., a cura di, Gruppoanalisi soggettuale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  6. Fasolo F., Ambrosiano I. e Cordioli A. (2005). Sviluppi della soggettualità nelle reti sociali. Psicoterapie di gruppo e carte di rete in psichiatria di comunità. Padova: CLEUP.
  7. Forte G., Favieri F., Tambelli R. e Casagrande M. (2020). The Enemy which Sealed the World: Effects of COVID-19 Diffusion on the Psychological State of the Italian Population. J. Clin. Med., 9(6), 1802. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061802
  8. Gatto Rotondo M.C., Cappetti C., Di Ris D., Da Boit M., Maggiolo C., Salis M., Salcuni S. e Ferruzza E. (2021). “Trovare una direzione”: vicissitudini identitarie di giovani adulti universitari. Studio preliminare sul processo di una psicoterapia psicoanalitica di gruppo a tempo determinato. Gruppi, XXI, 2: 106-129. DOI: 10.3280/gruoa2-2020oa12584
  9. Giannone F., Guarnaccia C., Gullo S., Di Blasi M., Giordano C., Lo Coco G. e Burlingame G. (2020). Italian Adaptation of the Group Questionnaire: Validity and Factorial Structure. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 23, 2: 133-144. DOI: 10.4081/ripppo.2020.443
  10. Krogel J., Burlingame G., Chapman C., Renshaw T., Gleave R., Beecher M. e MacNair-Semands R. (2013). The Group Questionnaire: A Clinical and Empirically Derived Measure of Group Relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 3: 344-354. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2012.729868
  11. Mazza C., Ricci E., Biondi S., Colasanti M., Ferracuti F., Napoli C. e Roma P. (2020). A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 9: 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093165
  12. Ministero delle politiche giovanili (2021). Relazione tecnica. Testo disponibile al sito: www.politichegiovanilieserviziocivile.gov.it.
  13. Oh H., Marinovich C., Ravi R., Besecker M., Zhou S., Jacob L., Koyanagi A. e Smith L. (2021). COVID-19 Dimensions are Related to Depression and Anxiety among US College Students: Findings from the Healthy Minds Survey 2020. J. of affective disorders, 292, 3: 270-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.121
  14. Rajkumar R.P. (2020). COVID-19 and Mental Health: A Review of the Existing Literature. Asian J. Psychiatr., 52, 102066. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066
  15. Simpson S.G. e Reid C.L. (2014). Alliance in Videoconferencing Psychotherapy. Aust. J. Rural Health, 22: 280-299. DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12149
  16. Weinberg H. (2021). Obstacles, Challenges and Benefits of Online Group Psychotherapy. American J. of Psychotherapy, 74(2): 83-88. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20200034

Ilaria Locati, Alessandra Gaffo, Margherita Forgione, Beatrice Ventura, Daniela Di Riso, Far quadrare il cerchio? Riflessioni su Positive Bonding e Negative Relationship in due gruppi di psicoterapia rivolti a giovani adulti: un confronto tra il setting online e in presenza in "GRUPPI" 2/2021, pp 125-145, DOI: 10.3280/gruoa2-2021oa15812