Commoning processes as devices for regeneration projects in marginal contexts

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Silvia Lanteri, Giulia Montanaro, Martina Spinelli, Ianira Vassallo
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2024/108-109
Language Italian Pages 12 P. 211-222 File size 863 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2024-108020
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article refers to the recent debate on experiences of commoning that are typically related to metropolitan contexts in response to processes of financialisation and privatisation of the space, with the aim to observe how recently they have moved into marginal contexts, where the dynamics of appropriation and use of the territory occur in different ways and for different reasons. The attention focuses on the project An (Architecture) School of commons (asoc), to investigate if and how commoning processes are able to respond to the contemporary challenges of professions linked to spatial design, and to build new visions for these territories.

Keywords: commoning processes; marginal areas; new territorial images.

  1. The Care Collectif, 2021, the care manifesto: The Politics of Interdependence. London: Verso Books.
  2. Andriani C., 2010, a cura di, Il patrimonio e l’abitare. Roma: Donzelli.
  3. Awan M.S., Malik N., Sarwar H., Waqas M., 2011, «Impact of education on poverty reduction». International Journal of Academic Research, 3, 1: 659-664. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/31826 (accesso: 2024.09.17).
  4. Appadurai A., 1996, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  5. Arena G., 2006, Cittadini attivi. Un altro modo di pensare all’Italia. Milano: Laterza.
  6. Balducci A., 2011, «Trading Zone un concetto utile per alcuni dilemmi della pianificazione». crios, 2: 38-45. DOI: 10.7373/70200
  7. Bresnihan P., Byrne M., 2014, «Escape into the City: Everyday Practices of Commoning and the Production of Urban Space in Dublin». Antipode, 4, 1:3 6-54.
  8. Boltanski L., Cappiello A., 2021, Arricchimento. Una critica della merce. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  9. Brenner N., Marcuse P., Mayer M., 2012, Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. London: Routledge.
  10. Carrosio G., 2019, I margini al centro. L’Italia delle aree interne tra fragilità e innovazione. Roma: Donzelli.
  11. Carrosio G., Osti G., 2017, «Le aree marginali». In: Pais I., Barbera F. (a cura di), Fondamenti di sociologia economica. Milano: Egea, 303-316. Catalanotti C., 2020, Contemporary architect groups and collectives. Discus-
  12. sing changes in architecture and urban design professional practice. Phd thesis, Doctorate in Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano. Chiappero F., 2017, Du Collectif Etc aux «Collectifs d’Architectes»: Une Pratique Matricielle du Projet pour une Implication Citoyenne. Phd thesis,
  13. Doctorate in Architecture, École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Marseille.
  14. Cohen A.P., 1985, The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Ellis Horwood.
  15. Cucinella M., 2018, a cura di, Arcipelago Italia. Progetti per il futuro dei territori interni del Paese. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  16. Darrieus M., 2014, «Collectifs d’architectes». AMC Archi, 232: 64-73. https:// pmbdoc.eivp-paris.fr/opac/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=17679 (accesso: 2024.09.17).
  17. De Angelis M., 2017, «Grounding social revolution: elements for a systems theory of commoning». In: Ruivenkamp G., Hilton A. (eds.), Perspectives on Commoning. Autonomist Principles and Practices. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 213-256.
  18. Della Scala V., Dini R., Lanteri S., 2022, Tra centro e margine. Un progetto per Salemi e il suo territorio. Milano: Electa.
  19. De Rossi A., 2018, a cura di, Riabitare l’Italia. Le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Roma: Donzelli.
  20. Dewey J., 1938, Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan Company. Donolo C., 2010, «I beni comuni presi sul serio». Labsus, 31 maggio. www. labsus.org/2010/05/i-beni-comuni-presi-sul-serio (accesso: 2024.11.22).
  21. Donolo C., 2012, «I beni comuni presi sul serio», In: Arena G., Iaione C. (a cura di), L’Italia dei Beni Comuni. Roma: Carocci, 13-54.
  22. Esposito De Vita G., Marchigiani E., Perrone C., 2020, «Sul solco e al di là della SNAI, in una prospettiva post-pandemica. Nuovi programmi di coesione come politiche ecologiche territoriali». Urbanistica Informazioni, 289, s.i. 3: 1-59. www.urbanisticainformazioni.it/IMG/pdf/ui289si_ses-sione_speciale_3.pdf (accesso: 2024.11.22).
  23. Favargiotti S., Ferretti M., Dalla Torre C., Elzenbaumer B., 2021, «I commons rurali: un’alternativa concreta di gestione del territorio. Alla ricerca delle pratiche collettive di cura dei Beni comuni in aree rurali». Labsus, 30 novembre. www.labsus.org/2021/11/i-commons-rurali-unalternati-va-concreta-di-gestione-del-territorio (accesso: 2024.11.22).
  24. Federici S., 2016 «Feminism and the Politics of the Commons». In: Hlavajova M., Sheikh S. (eds.), Former West: Art and the Contemporary After 1989. Utrecht: BAK, 379-390.
  25. Fournier V., 2013, «Commoning: on the social organisation of the commons». M@n@gement, 16, 4: 433-453.
  26. Franklin A., Marsden T., 2015, «(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making». Local Environ, 20: 940-956. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.879852
  27. Germani G., 1980, Marginality. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
  28. Guadalupi C., 2019, Undisciplined expertise. Reflections on an emerging profession within Tactical Urbanism. Phd thesis, Doctorate in Urban and Regional Development, Politecnico di Torino.
  29. Hardt M., Negri A., 2004, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Books.
  30. Harriss H., Hyde R., Marcaccio R., 2020, eds., Architects After Architecture: Alternative Pathways for Practice. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003007753
  31. Harvey D., 2004, «The New Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession». Socialist Register, 40: 63-87. https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5811/2707 (accesso: 2024.11.22).
  32. Harvey D., 2012, Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso Book.
  33. Hickel J., 2019, «The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet». Sustainable Development, 2, 5: 873-884.
  34. Hooks B., 1998, Elogio del margine. Milano: Feltrinelli. Koolhaas R., 2020, Countryside, A Report. Cologne: Taschen.
  35. Lanteri S., Montanaro G., Spinelli M., Vassallo I., 2024, «Tiers-lieux. Il ruolo del progetto nel ripensare pratiche di comunità e spazi collettivi: il caso de La Place des Possibles e del contributo del Collectif Etc». Contesti. Città, territori, progetti, 1: 84-103.
  36. Magnaghi A., 2010, Il progetto locale. Torino: Bollate Boringhieri. Magnaghi A., 2020, Il principio territoriale. Milano: Bollati Boringhieri. Pagetti F., Ietri D., Molinari P., 2019, «Accessibility and Peripheries: An
  37. Empirical Investigation in the Lombardy Region». Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 14, 2: 37-48.
  38. Petrescu, D., Chiles, P., ‘The Agency’, 2009, «Agency: Alternative practices and alternative worlds». Architectural Research Quarterly, 1, 2: 109-111. DOI: 10.1017/S1359135509990194
  39. Schneider T., Till J., 2008a, «Editorial: Alternate Currents.». Field, 2, 1: 1-5. Schneider T., Till J., 2008b, «Introduction: Alternate Currents». Architectural Research Quarterly, 12, 2: 109-111.
  40. Sennett R., 2012, Insieme. Rituali, piaceri, politiche della collaborazione, Milano: Feltrinelli.
  41. Stavrides S., 2016, Common Space: The City as Commons, London: Zed books.

Silvia Lanteri, Giulia Montanaro, Martina Spinelli, Ianira Vassallo, I processi di commoning come dispositivi del progetto di rigenerazione in contesti marginali in "TERRITORIO" 108-109/2024, pp 211-222, DOI: 10.3280/TR2024-108020